On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> I tried the same, and it seems that only DDs are blocked from
> registering sponsored. Other debian statuses can still select
> sponsored.
>
> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> to fix stuff.
So can you a
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> > I tried the same, and it seems that only DDs are blocked from
> > registering sponsored. Other debian statuses can still select
> > sponsored.
> >
> > Perhaps this should be fi
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> to fix stuff.
we need to send this out _now_. 2 weeks reconfirmation period is already quite
short.
we can still check the db to see fields which got changed after the deadli
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
>> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
>> to fix stuff.
>
> we need to send this out _now_. 2 weeks reconfirmation period is already quite
> short.
>
> we can s
P.S.
While we can perhaps be somewhat more liberal about deadlines etc. if
we're not paying for accommodation ourselves, it's unfair on our
accommodation sponsor to simply jump from that to "anything goes".
Indeed, they could quite justifiably expect us to be as strict as
normal.
We should also c
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> That would make that set of scripts need to look at logging schema,
> which would be quite a modification as it is. I can try to make a
> separate query to find these people and deal with them by some other
> method.
Right, I didn't mean th
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> (a) fix it now, revert all people who took advantage of it
whats wrong with this approach? IMO its the right one.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mai
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Moray Allan wrote:
> While we can perhaps be somewhat more liberal about deadlines etc. if
> we're not paying for accommodation ourselves, it's unfair on our
> accommodation sponsor to simply jump from that to "anything goes".
> Indeed, they could quite justifiably expec
Hi Moray!
* Moray Allan [2011-06-15 11:01]:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> >> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> >> to fix stuff.
> >
> > we need to send this out _now_. 2 weeks r
I misspelled the address, didn't I?
Original Message
Subject:Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:12:58 -0300 (ART)
From: mailer-dae...@mail.madap.com.ar (Mail Delivery System)
To: der...@debian.org
This is the mail system at host mail
Hi Dererk,
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Dererk wrote:
> I misspelled the address, didn't I?
yes, its debconf11-localt...@l.dc._org_
and you'll want to ask v...@debconf.org for those letters.
Out of curiosity, why didnt you ask for a letter earlier?
cheers,
Holger
_
On 15/06/11 11:27, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Dererk,
>
> On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Dererk wrote:
>> I misspelled the address, didn't I?
> yes, its debconf11-localt...@l.dc._org_
>
> and you'll want to ask v...@debconf.org for those letters.
>
>
> Out of curiosity, why didnt you ask for a letter e
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:01:40 +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> >> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> >> to fix stuff.
> >
> > we need to send this out _now_.
Richard Darst dijo [Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:10:01PM -0400]:
> > "The deadline for sponsored attendees' registration was May 19, so
> > your changes were not accepted. Contact registrat...@debconf.org if
> > changes are needed."
> >
> > So there is some check in place.
>
> I tried the same, and it
Richard Darst dijo [Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:30:41AM -0400]:
> (...)
> That would make that set of scripts need to look at logging schema,
> which would be quite a modification as it is. I can try to make a
> separate query to find these people and deal with them by some other
> method.
>
> I gues
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Umh, I'd go for (a), as it reflects -as it has been said here- what we
> originally announced.
Another point for this that no one mentioned yet: formally, choosing
the option in Penta is merely *applying* for sponsorship. And it
shouldn't be
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:17:10PM -0600, René Mayorga wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:27:09PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Hi Dererk,
> >
> > On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Dererk wrote:
> > > I misspelled the address, didn't I?
> >
> > yes, its debconf11-localt...@l.dc._org_
> >
> > and yo
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:27:09PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Dererk,
>
> On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Dererk wrote:
> > I misspelled the address, didn't I?
>
> yes, its debconf11-localt...@l.dc._org_
>
> and you'll want to ask v...@debconf.org for those letters.
>
Oh, Wiki saids tra...@d
Hi,
There is another bug related to the multi-select "status" and
"categor" fields.
If someone is a DD, and "Basic (no accom provided)", they can not
register "Regular Room", as wanted.
However, if they are a[ny] other status, then you can select basic +
regular room, which is an error.
- richa
Richard Darst dijo [Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 07:06:19PM -0400]:
> Hi,
>
> There is another bug related to the multi-select "status" and
> "categor" fields.
>
> If someone is a DD, and "Basic (no accom provided)", they can not
> register "Regular Room", as wanted.
>
> However, if they are a[ny] other
20 matches
Mail list logo
