Hi,
just appending some info which was given on IRC: (for those not following
IRC.)
On Mittwoch, 24. Oktober 2012, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> > 3a. So assuming we'd sign the lecamp contract (or any others introducing
> > 150K in costs) how would you propose to deal with the, eg, 100K debt?
> > Share
David Bremner writes:
> micah anderson writes:
>
>> I want to emphasis a bit what Moray wrote above. If travel sponsorship
>> is eliminated because other things are too expensive, that results in a
>> Debconf where only people who can afford to go can go. It raises the
>> economic minimum bar to
micah anderson writes:
> I want to emphasis a bit what Moray wrote above. If travel sponsorship
> is eliminated because other things are too expensive, that results in a
> Debconf where only people who can afford to go can go. It raises the
> economic minimum bar to a level where we cut people of
Moray Allan writes:
> On 2012-10-25 01:39, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Right. Emergency mode rarely makes us take the best
>> decisions. However, in order to get the number closer in line with
>> the
>> forseen numbers, we can assume no travel sponsorship will be
>> paid. That will mean we have to bud
On 2012-10-25 01:39, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
Right. Emergency mode rarely makes us take the best
decisions. However, in order to get the number closer in line with
the
forseen numbers, we can assume no travel sponsorship will be
paid. That will mean we have to budget for IIRC CHF30K less - And
~15%
On 25/10/12 02:33, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Daniel Pocock dijo [Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:20:14PM +0200]:
>
>>> 1. budget is now (?) assuming 220K, with 100k coming from sponsors and 100k
>>> coming from attendees and 20k missing.
>>> (...)
>>>
>> This is what I've been trying to emphasize al
Gaudenz Steinlin dijo [Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 05:00:04PM +0200]:
> > 2. travel sponsorship: I think given the finacial situation, we can stop
> > thinking about it. Really.
>
> As I also said during the meeting I disagree. I think we should at least
> make sure that the results from the discussion
Daniel Pocock dijo [Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 06:20:14PM +0200]:
> > 1. budget is now (?) assuming 220K, with 100k coming from sponsors and 100k
> > coming from attendees and 20k missing.
> > (...)
>
> This is what I've been trying to emphasize all along - even with other
> venues, there is no such t
On 2012-10-24 20:17, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Sorry, I was probably unclear. I did not mean to say that we should
ignore how DC 13 gets money but the income side of the PDF files that
were commited to SVN. Or more precise just ignore the very
controversial
idea of "attendence fees" that is in th
Hi
Moray Allan writes:
> On 2012-10-24 16:00, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>> For now I suggest to just ignore the income side of the budget.
>
> LOL.
Sorry, I was probably unclear. I did not mean to say that we should
ignore how DC 13 gets money but the income side of the PDF files that
were commi
On 24/10/12 14:39, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading through the meeting log and these are my comments.
>
> 1. budget is now (?) assuming 220K, with 100k coming from sponsors and 100k
> coming from attendees and 20k missing.
>
> reply: frankly speaking, thats not my DebConf, 100k from
On 2012-10-24 16:00, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
For now I suggest to just ignore the income side of the budget.
LOL.
--
Moray
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
On 2012-10-24 16:00, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
4. I disagree with Gunnar on "We are either holding DC13 in
Switzerland or
cancelling it altogether, I think" ;-)
I hope nobody seriously considers cancelling at this point. I don't
think talking about cancelling any further helps at the moment.
T
Hi
I'll try to answer from my POV. I think any serious discussions should
not be done as replies to this thread but as individual mailinglist
threads with one topic per thread. So I'll try to just cler any possible
missunderstanding.
Holger Levsen writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading through the meet
Hi,
I'm reading through the meeting log and these are my comments.
1. budget is now (?) assuming 220K, with 100k coming from sponsors and 100k
coming from attendees and 20k missing.
reply: frankly speaking, thats not my DebConf, 100k from attendees means 250
from each attendee, if 400 come an
15 matches
Mail list logo
