Following today's meeting:
Please proceed with the initial order of t-shirts, and please also start
a separate invoicing process for a second batch of staff t-shirts.
Numbers for the initial order:
> Attendee
>
> Size Order
> XS10
> S 30
> M 65
> L 80 (includ
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Richard Darst wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 09:51:21AM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>> Thank you Richard, I'll do the reservations today.
>
> Can you elaborate?
Sorry, seems like I won't be reserving anything today. DIVA said they
sent an email to the debconf-team
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 09:51:21AM +0200, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Thank you Richard, I'll do the reservations today.
Can you elaborate?
Are you reserving by room? by person? Will you tell us what rooms
you reserve (what types in what hotels, and where they are, if
possible), so that we can assign
Thank you Richard, I'll do the reservations today.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> The "final numbers" can be found in the same place they have been
> updating for the last month or so - they are just saner now:
>
> http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/only-reconfirmed/rooms-b
The "final numbers" can be found in the same place they have been
updating for the last month or so - they are just saner now:
http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/only-reconfirmed/rooms-by-date-2.txt
- This is the same thing as was on the whiteboard, just automatically
updated.
- The upperm
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Umh, I'd go for (a), as it reflects -as it has been said here- what we
> originally announced.
Another point for this that no one mentioned yet: formally, choosing
the option in Penta is merely *applying* for sponsorship. And it
shouldn't be
Richard Darst dijo [Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:30:41AM -0400]:
> (...)
> That would make that set of scripts need to look at logging schema,
> which would be quite a modification as it is. I can try to make a
> separate query to find these people and deal with them by some other
> method.
>
> I gues
Richard Darst dijo [Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:10:01PM -0400]:
> > "The deadline for sponsored attendees' registration was May 19, so
> > your changes were not accepted. Contact registrat...@debconf.org if
> > changes are needed."
> >
> > So there is some check in place.
>
> I tried the same, and it
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:01:40 +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> >> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> >> to fix stuff.
> >
> > we need to send this out _now_.
Hi Moray!
* Moray Allan [2011-06-15 11:01]:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> >> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> >> to fix stuff.
> >
> > we need to send this out _now_. 2 weeks r
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Moray Allan wrote:
> While we can perhaps be somewhat more liberal about deadlines etc. if
> we're not paying for accommodation ourselves, it's unfair on our
> accommodation sponsor to simply jump from that to "anything goes".
> Indeed, they could quite justifiably expec
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> (a) fix it now, revert all people who took advantage of it
whats wrong with this approach? IMO its the right one.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mai
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> That would make that set of scripts need to look at logging schema,
> which would be quite a modification as it is. I can try to make a
> separate query to find these people and deal with them by some other
> method.
Right, I didn't mean th
P.S.
While we can perhaps be somewhat more liberal about deadlines etc. if
we're not paying for accommodation ourselves, it's unfair on our
accommodation sponsor to simply jump from that to "anything goes".
Indeed, they could quite justifiably expect us to be as strict as
normal.
We should also c
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
>> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
>> to fix stuff.
>
> we need to send this out _now_. 2 weeks reconfirmation period is already quite
> short.
>
> we can s
On Mittwoch, 15. Juni 2011, Richard Darst wrote:
> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> to fix stuff.
we need to send this out _now_. 2 weeks reconfirmation period is already quite
short.
we can still check the db to see fields which got changed after the deadli
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 09:14:23AM +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> > I tried the same, and it seems that only DDs are blocked from
> > registering sponsored. Other debian statuses can still select
> > sponsored.
> >
> > Perhaps this should be fi
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:10 AM, Richard Darst wrote:
> I tried the same, and it seems that only DDs are blocked from
> registering sponsored. Other debian statuses can still select
> sponsored.
>
> Perhaps this should be fixed before sending the emails asking people
> to fix stuff.
So can you a
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:58:19PM +0100, Moray Allan wrote:
> I tried choosing sponsorship now with a test account and got an error
>
> "The deadline for sponsored attendees' registration was May 19, so
> your changes were not accepted. Contact registrat...@debconf.org if
> changes are needed."
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Moray Allan >
http://munin.debconf.org/debconf.org/skinner.debconf.org-penta_accomodation.html
This page had counts between 270 and 282, decreasing at the end of the
period visible.
http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/registration-data.txt says
"Accommodation:
317
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Now when you registered can you still register for sponsored
> accommodation? It should've been disabled but I'm asking because
> number keeps increasing and I don't see pro/corporate category get
> more attendees ... so I hope it was disabled
I asked this question last night but no one answered.
Now when you registered can you still register for sponsored
accommodation? It should've been disabled but I'm asking because
number keeps increasing and I don't see pro/corporate category get
more attendees ... so I hope it was disabled
Adna
Hi,
DebConf12 team, take note. When the global team is prodding on lots
of little details about when we need to know things by, it's usually
for a reason. I burned a lot of goodwill trying to prod on this kind
of stuff, with the answer being "oh it will be fine".
If we had known about these l
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Moray Allan wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>> Now, government, hotels and everybody is
>> highly flexible but they want *exact* numbers, and we're all but being
>> exact right now.
>
> but later you say
>
>> Also I
>> suggest we have
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Now, government, hotels and everybody is
> highly flexible but they want *exact* numbers, and we're all but being
> exact right now.
but later you say
> Also I
> suggest we have reconfirmation email sent on 24-th (June) as one month
> before
During this whole time of registrations I've been keep a close eye on
numbers, mostly on
http://rkd.zgib.net/http/debconf/registration-data.txt and last night
we had a meeting where we concluded that reconfirmation date should be
3rd of July.
After careful consideration and talking to other partie
26 matches
Mail list logo
