On Donnerstag, 29. August 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> what about -team?
better than -private, IMO. thanks.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.d
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 28. August 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > [...] As I already offered:
> > create two lists. One for the _general_ discussion of children on debconf
> > without a specific relation to a kid themselve and a second list/alias for
> >
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 28. August 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> [...] As I already offered:
> create two lists. One for the _general_ discussion of children on debconf
> without a specific relation to a kid themselve and a second list/alias for
> the team to discuss/coordinate the things that aren't for
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Patty Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:08:09AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> > I also cannot see the need to have this list created as
> > private-secret-nonarchived. Some preferences specific to each of the
> > kids will be discussed, sure, but I really doubt str
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:08:09AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I also cannot see the need to have this list created as
> private-secret-nonarchived. Some preferences specific to each of the
> kids will be discussed, sure, but I really doubt strong
> individual-characteric features of each kid will
I am closing the request. At the moment, there is no need for this
list, I think, and we can revisit this medium-term. Meanwhile, we
know who to speak to.
--
.''`. martin f. krafft
: :' : DebConf orga team
`. `'`
`- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org
i don't wan
martin f krafft dijo [Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:05:44PM +0200]:
> > No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic
> > this doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even
> > when I won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in
> > later (when debconf comes bac
also sprach Alexander Wirt [2013.08.27.0804 +0200]:
> No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic
> this doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even
> when I won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in
> later (when debconf comes back to europe) and
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Alexander Wirt [2013.08.26.2322 +0200]:
> > I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private
> > without archiving.
> >
> > Please give me some details which this makes sense. I thought
> > debconf is an open project.
>
> Go
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote:
> Package: lists.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o
>
> - unarchived
> - with subscriptions requiring acknowledgement by a moderator.
I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private without
archi
also sprach Alexander Wirt [2013.08.26.2322 +0200]:
> I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private
> without archiving.
>
> Please give me some details which this makes sense. I thought
> debconf is an open project.
Good question. I think the reason is two-fold:
1. Some paren
Package: lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o
- unarchived
- with subscriptions requiring acknowledgement by a moderator.
Please add the following moderators for now (probably going to be
changed…):
- ric...@debian.org
- madd...@debian.org
- jo...@d
12 matches
Mail list logo