Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-29 Thread Holger Levsen
On Donnerstag, 29. August 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote: > what about -team? better than -private, IMO. thanks. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.d

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-29 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Thu, 29 Aug 2013, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Mittwoch, 28. August 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > [...] As I already offered: > > create two lists. One for the _general_ discussion of children on debconf > > without a specific relation to a kid themselve and a second list/alias for > >

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-29 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Mittwoch, 28. August 2013, Alexander Wirt wrote: > [...] As I already offered: > create two lists. One for the _general_ discussion of children on debconf > without a specific relation to a kid themselve and a second list/alias for > the team to discuss/coordinate the things that aren't for

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-28 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Patty Langasek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:08:09AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > > I also cannot see the need to have this list created as > > private-secret-nonarchived. Some preferences specific to each of the > > kids will be discussed, sure, but I really doubt str

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-27 Thread Patty Langasek
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:08:09AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I also cannot see the need to have this list created as > private-secret-nonarchived. Some preferences specific to each of the > kids will be discussed, sure, but I really doubt strong > individual-characteric features of each kid will

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-27 Thread martin f krafft
I am closing the request. At the moment, there is no need for this list, I think, and we can revisit this medium-term. Meanwhile, we know who to speak to. -- .''`. martin f. krafft : :' : DebConf orga team `. `'` `- DebConf14: Portland, OR, USA: http://debconf14.debconf.org i don't wan

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-27 Thread Gunnar Wolf
martin f krafft dijo [Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:05:44PM +0200]: > > No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic > > this doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even > > when I won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in > > later (when debconf comes bac

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-27 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Alexander Wirt [2013.08.27.0804 +0200]: > No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic > this doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even > when I won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in > later (when debconf comes back to europe) and

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-27 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Alexander Wirt [2013.08.26.2322 +0200]: > > I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private > > without archiving. > > > > Please give me some details which this makes sense. I thought > > debconf is an open project. > > Go

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-26 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013, martin f krafft wrote: > Package: lists.debian.org > Severity: wishlist > > Please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o > > - unarchived > - with subscriptions requiring acknowledgement by a moderator. I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private without archi

Re: [Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-26 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Alexander Wirt [2013.08.26.2322 +0200]: > I don't see any valid argument why this list should be private > without archiving. > > Please give me some details which this makes sense. I thought > debconf is an open project. Good question. I think the reason is two-fold: 1. Some paren

[Debconf-team] Bug#720996: please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o

2013-08-26 Thread martin f krafft
Package: lists.debian.org Severity: wishlist Please create debconf-kids@lists.d.o - unarchived - with subscriptions requiring acknowledgement by a moderator. Please add the following moderators for now (probably going to be changed…): - ric...@debian.org - madd...@debian.org - jo...@d