martin f krafft dijo [Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 05:05:44PM +0200]: > > No, I am sorry. Especially as a parent interested in the topic > > this doesn't make sense to me. I want to follow the process, even > > when I won't participate now. But I want to be able to step in > > later (when debconf comes back to europe) and I want to read the > > archives then. > > In that case, discussions on the list will be limited to an abstract > level, and to the input of those parents who don't care about how > much the Web gets to know about their kids. Those parents who > exercise care in not predefining their kids' online personae will > not participate in the same way they would if they'd know that > anything they say will be read only by a closed circle of people. > > How about making archives non-public but only accessible to > subscribers?
I also cannot see the need to have this list created as private-secret-nonarchived. Some preferences specific to each of the kids will be discussed, sure, but I really doubt strong individual-characteric features of each kid will be part of this. Stating you have a given number of kids, of a given age (or age rank), or that you want allergies to be taken into consideration should not require setting up another -private list. Even worse, as you are requesting it not to be archived. Maybe those needs would be better served by not having the list be in official lists? _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
