Andreas Schuldei dijo [Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:49:29AM +0100]:
> i would suggest to outsource that work to the participants.
>
> we should try to get pre-perforated paper in the proper format
> (if it costs a bit, ok, it is worth the saved work), and
> personalize and colorcode the single tickets.
Hi,
On Friday 10 March 2006 11:49, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
> i would suggest to outsource that work to the participants.
I think this, "outsourcing to the participants" is very much the wrong
attitude.
It's not (or it shouldn't be), us and them.
regards,
Holger
pgpzQCDuOBEwR.pgp
De
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 11:56:35PM -0500, Rudy Godoy wrote:
> El d?a 28/02/2006 a 14:19 Gunnar Wolf escribi?...
>
>
> > Yes, I also liked a lot how that system worked - Now, the down side is
> > the logistical cost: First, we must make sure to include the proper
> > tickets (with the proper dates
El d�a 28/02/2006 a 14:19 Gunnar Wolf escribi�...
> Yes, I also liked a lot how that system worked - Now, the down side is
> the logistical cost: First, we must make sure to include the proper
> tickets (with the proper dates) in the bags of each person. Second,
> whoever checks them must be aske
Hi!
* Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060302 13:09]:
> > That's for sure. Seeing Ganneff pretending to be 1.68m high would be
> > worth to loose one meal :)
> Wait - Do I have to get height/weight/photo information in the
> nametags? :-O
No, I was just joking.
Asking for pictures is useless si
Hi
> Wait - Do I have to get height/weight/photo information in the
> nametags? :-O
>
> Seriously though... We could request for a photo and add it, but I
> don't think that'd make much sense... Specially given that nametags
> are quite small and I prefer the name to be readable than to be
> redun
Alexander Schmehl dijo [Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:56:38AM +0100]:
> > > (Maybe Ganneff who is always hungry... but didn't someone told us, the
> > > portions there are even big enough for him?)
> > Well, YOU'll go get me some food if he rips off my badge and gets extra
> > serving pretending he was m
Hi!
* Meike Reichle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060302 09:31]:
> > (Maybe Ganneff who is always hungry... but didn't someone told us, the
> > portions there are even big enough for him?)
> Well, YOU'll go get me some food if he rips off my badge and gets extra
> serving pretending he was me ;)
That's f
Hi all
[Alexander Schmehl]
> Uhm... nearly everyone will have those tickets, so whome would you like
> to invite?
Alright, I yield to the majority. Visual authentication it is :)
> (Maybe Ganneff who is always hungry... but didn't someone told us, the
> portions there are even big enough for him
Hi!
* Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060228 12:37]:
> What do you think? Do you oppose the simple trust model?
I would prefer the simple trust model without food tickets; mainly
because food tickets always end up not near to me, when I need them - I
always forget them (and I think I'm not the
Hi!
* Meike Reichle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060228 14:39]:
> My idea was the following: If we have n food tickets we'll have
> to pay for n meals. However, it does not matter *who* uses a food ticket.
> So if I skiped a meal and thus have an extra ticket, I can give it to
> someone else, so (s)he us
Martin Wuertele dijo [Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:37:33PM +0100]:
> > Yes, but we must discourage this - The restaurant works with some
> > margin for adjustement, of course... But if we invite 10% extra people
> > (think DebianDay), we will end up with too little food to serve -
> > And that's bad as
Hi Gunnar!
* Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-28 14:30]:
> Yes, but we must discourage this - The restaurant works with some
> margin for adjustement, of course... But if we invite 10% extra people
> (think DebianDay), we will end up with too little food to serve -
> And that's bad as wel
This sound good and simple to me (the visual authentication).
Regards,
Safir
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:37, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> This weekend we talked some points over with the people at Oaxtepec -
> we will report them over several short mails :)
>
> Regarding the restaurant: They told me
Hi,
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 12:37, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> This weekend we talked some points over with the people at Oaxtepec -
> we will report them over several short mails :)
Thanks!
[...]
> What do you think? Do you oppose the simple trust model?
I like it. And looking at the possible dam
Hi
> Meike Reichle dijo [Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:27:25PM +0100]:
>> 3) Pure visual authentication: Debianers are a social crowd. I would
>> assume there would be at least some (well-meant) abuse. Providing
>> tickets
>> would still allow people to swap meals or invite others but hopefully
>> the
>
Meike Reichle dijo [Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 02:27:25PM +0100]:
> 3) Pure visual authentication: Debianers are a social crowd. I would
> assume there would be at least some (well-meant) abuse. Providing tickets
> would still allow people to swap meals or invite others but hopefully the
> overall number
Nadezhda asked me to post some more information in this regard we were
talking with them, even if I tought it was somewhat obvious - Thanks
:)
First of all, if we were to decide for the barcode reader, we _still_
have to provide a person that goes to each of the tables, scans the
barcodes and OK's
Hi Gunnar et al
I would prefer the meal ticket alternative, for the following reasons:
1) The barcode scanners are cool in theory but in practice they seem to be
a hassle and also pretty cost intensive. Also, to make sure things work
out even if the scanner system f***s up we'd most likely have t
This weekend we talked some points over with the people at Oaxtepec -
we will report them over several short mails :)
Regarding the restaurant: They told me the preferred way with large
groups is not to use barcode scanners, not even to use tickets, but to
use visual authentication - the waiters
20 matches
Mail list logo
