Dear teams, and I guess specifically you leaders…
We are now approaching the time when the budget for DC15 needs to be
prepared and approved. Therefore, it would be really useful if you
could spend a bit of time thinking about what you'll need, so that
we can take that into account.
We're fully a
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>> While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
>>> vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
>>> skip meat
On Thu 2015-02-05 13:47:14 -0500, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I fail to see why you think that the current proposed wording of "no
> dietary restrictions" implies that every meal will have meat.
I think this because i've seen it happen very often.
Many conference meals i've been at include explicit
On 05/02/15 18:49, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I think this is right(er), although still pointless IMO. I do not
> believe (most) people expect to eat meat at every meal. I think it
> would be easier to agree with our caterer to provide meat for
> approximately half of the days. I don't think it'd be see
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> >> > I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
> >
> > Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
>
> I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, e
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-02-05 19:49
+0100]:
> > Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
>
> I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want
> to talk about summit specifically? OTOH, what if we use something else
> in a few years?
Then debconf-infra will be
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
> Hi everybody
> El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió:
>
> I would change the perspective: "tell cooks the things they can add to
> the menu".
> What about this proposal?
>
> Diet:
> - Not applicable
>
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>> > I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
>
> Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want
to talk about summit specifically? OTOH, what if we use something else
Daniel Kahn Gillmor dijo [Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:25:37AM -0500]:
> >> While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
> >> vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
> >> skip meat one day, I really don't agree with your proposal.
>
> Can you think of a
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes:
> On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>> On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>> While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
>>> vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
>>> skip meat
Hi everybody
El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió:
>
> So i'm amending my earlier proposal to this:
>
> Dietary restrictions:
> - Not applicable
> - No dietary restrictions <>
> - Lacto-Ovo Vegetarian (dairy and eggs OK)
> - Vegan (strict vegetarian)
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> > I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
> > lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
> > list infrastructure anyway.
> Ye
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>> While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
>> vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
>> skip meat one day, I really don't agree with
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
> lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
> list infrastructure anyway.
Yes.
> I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
Fine by me.
I would pre
Don Armstrong writes:
> On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> > 1) name of the psuedopackage
>> >
>> > Presumably, that's "summit.debconf.org" in this case.
>>
>> Correct.
>>
>> > 2) a short description of what the pseudopackage
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> Lacto-ovo-vegetarian is by definition a dietary restriction, no matter
> how you frame it.
I agree.
"No restriction" means that catering can use any reasonably common
ingredients. Personally, I do not think that this means there _needs_
to
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings
wrote:
>> [X] Subscribe to announcement list <>
Please make this mandatory. Add
"We are committed to your privacy and will not spam you. Yet, we want
to make sure that we can reach you in case anything really important
happens."
or similar.
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:59:03PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Could frame this differently? The normal framing (above) often ends up
> with an assumption that everyone must eat meat, with only a limited
> set-aside for vegetarians. This results in overconsumption of meat: it
> force
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> On 04/02/15 22:59, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> Could frame this differently? The normal framing (above) often ends up
>> with an assumption that everyone must eat meat, with only a limited
>> set-aside for vegetarians. This results in overconsu
19 matches
Mail list logo
