On 05/02/15 18:49, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I think this is right(er), although still pointless IMO. I do not > believe (most) people expect to eat meat at every meal. I think it > would be easier to agree with our caterer to provide meat for > approximately half of the days. I don't think it'd be seen as too > little, and I think you would approve of the idea of setting a > hard-maximum on served meat! :)
As I said before, the problem is not the form, but the caterers just putting N vegetarian and M meat-including dishes, instead of offering a bit more choice. Instead of trying to have no-meat days, the caterer could just have some extra vegetarian on offer, and let people choose, while having a reserve for the people who only eat vegetarian. Also, usually making extra amounts of vegetarian food is not such a big problem, because that food can usually be recycled into something else (vegetarian or not) in the next meal. All of this, though, is unrelated to the form, and something that it will have to be dealt with the caterer. -- Martín Ferrari (Tincho) _______________________________________________ Debconf-team mailing list Debconf-team@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-team
