Namaste,
I am just going through all recorded sessions of Debconf14 & spotted 1
blind person at few sessions including 'Meet_the_Technical_Committee'
session. I have attended many technical conferences in person/ virtually &
this is the 1st time I see a visually impaired person at technical
confer
Namaste,
On 04.09.2014 09:10, sco1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Namaste,
> Unfortunately I don't no his name. If some1 knows him, I am really
> interested to know how he manages to summarize various Debian mailing
> lists on day to day basis. Which open source interpretation tool he
> uses. I am also in
also sprach Daniel Pocock [2014-08-22 10:23 -0700]:
> If anybody wants to try any of the Debian-based solutions for remote
> participation and if you have trouble with them, please feel free to
> contact me.
Of course we are interested, and this came up even. Have you
considered the implications
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's also possible that, as a matter of course, we should ensure that the
> antiharassment team responds timely in writing to all complaints, even if
> there is an out-of-band follow-up.
Following up in the same media used for a complaint i
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> To be specific about what words I'm talking about, I have seen people use
> both "" and "" in a professional HR presentation context with
> basically no reaction (although the latter is much less common). Several
> speakers used those
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> I would like to ask to remove the "Do not photograph me" checkbox in
> Debconf registration form as we do not really have a technology to
> implement that.
> [...]
While we could colour-code badges and lanyards, this is not
fool-proof. Dif
Hello,
On 4 September 2014 13:14, Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>there are many "workflows", you can see two of them (braille terminal /
>speech "terminal") in
>
http://meetings-archive.debian.net/pub/debian-meetings/2009/debconf9/high/1014_Accessibility_and_Debian.ogv
>[This video is from DebConf 9 i
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] Code of Conduct violations
handling process"):
> In the particular incident prompting this thread, [...]
I started writing a response to this. But I found that my response,
no matter how carefully phrased, read like an attack on the people who
dealt
martin f krafft writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] Code of Conduct violations
handling process"):
> also sprach Patty Langasek [2014-09-03 16:57 -0700]:
> > The way this particular Code of Conduct Violation Complaint was
> > handled was entirely my fault.
>
> I don't think there is any point in thin
alberto fuentes writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] DebConf conference policy on
profanity"):
> [0] Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the lists
> via packet radio, where swearing is illegal.
I doubt anyone is streaming Debconf video over packet radio.
My experience was that I and
On Sep 03, 2014, at 07:14 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>One of the things I wanted to address post-DebConf14 is to make sure the
>event pages in summit.debconf.org include direct links to the video
>recordings.
Does anybody know when the Saturday 2014-08-30 talks will be posted? I was
traveling, bu
"sco1...@gmail.com" writes:
> Unfortunately I don't no his name.
That would be Sam Hartman.
http://raphaelhertzog.com/2011/06/24/people-behin-debian-sam-hartman-kerberos-package-maintainer/
Bdale
pgpwC7rR1NFnY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
De
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Also, should we expect the videos to show up under
> http://annex.debconf.org/debconf-share/debconf14/ at some point?
*cough* oups *cough*
They are in the annex (I just synced another batch which I had added
on disk over time).
That being
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
> the good news is the string and summit db key is here:
> http://veyepar.nextdayvideo.com/main/C/debian/S/debconf14.json
>
> "slug": "HPs_OpenStack_Helion_Debian_all_the_way_down",
> "conf_url":
> "https://summit.debconf.org/debconf14/meeting/13
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 4. September 2014, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> As I said on IRC a few times, I still think it would make sense to
> prefix this ID to all talk names.
definitly!
> PS: Also as per IRC, we would probably need to symlink
> already-published videos to their new names; else random li
Hi Aigars,
Thanks for your work and considerations!
On Donnerstag, 4. September 2014, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> I would like to ask to remove the "Do not photograph me" checkbox in
> Debconf registration form as we do not really have a technology to
> implement that.
I agree.
> As an alternativ
Richard Hartmann wrote:
> > Also, should we expect the videos to show up under
> > http://annex.debconf.org/debconf-share/debconf14/ at some point?
>
> *cough* oups *cough*
>
> They are in the annex (I just synced another batch which I had added
> on disk over time).
>
> That being said, they're
alberto fuentes writes:
> [...]
> [0] Do not use foul language; besides, some people receive the lists
> via packet radio, where swearing is illegal.
> [...]
> Please refrain from using those words in here. Use poo and m'kay instead[1]
> [0] https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
>
Can you magic up a way to convert URL content into links to the actual WWW
target?
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 05:27:46PM +0200, Richard Hartmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Carl Karsten wrote:
> > the good news is the string and summit db key is here:
> > http://veyepar.nextdayvideo.com/main/C/debian/S/debconf14.json
> > "slug": "HPs_OpenStack_Helion_Debian_all_the_wa
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> One of the things I wanted to address post-DebConf14 is to make sure the
> event pages in summit.debconf.org include direct links to the video
> recordings. Can you tell me if there's a reliable naming scheme for these
> files? E.g., it app
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> This provision has been ignored on our mailing lists for as long as I've
> been a member of the project. There was some recent discussion of the
> packet radio reference that concluded that this justification was rather
> dubious. I wonder if
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 20:11 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
> about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
> isn't the right place to talk about it, and I've been trying to make a
> point of doing my p
also sprach Ian Jackson [2014-09-04 05:15
-0700]:
> I am not angry or upset with the performance of Debconf organisers
> or the antiharassment team. Rather, I feel that they were not
> provided with the tools and support required to do their job.
Right, and we are also new to this. We should no
Hi Alberto,
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:45:51PM +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > One of the things I wanted to address post-DebConf14 is to make sure the
> > event pages in summit.debconf.org include direct links to the video
> > recordings.
Aigars Mahinovs writes ("[Debconf-discuss] "Do not photograph" checkbox in
registration"):
> [stuff]
I have nothing substantive to add to what you and others have written,
but I did want to thank you for thinking about this issue carefully,
raising it here, and helping to work to find a reasonabl
Ben Hutchings writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] DebConf conference policy on
profanity"):
> Biella also tweeted one of her slides in advance of her talk, and I
> pointed out the rule to her then. I believe she subsequently discussed
> the (considerable) number of quoted expletives in the slides with
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:11:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
> about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
> isn't the right place to talk about it, and I've been trying to make a
> point of doi
also sprach Ben Hutchings [2014-09-04 10:58 -0700]:
> It has also not been unusual for a few expletives to appear in
> slides or spoken words in talks at previous DebConfs. So far as
> I know, that hasn't been something people complained about in the
> past.
>
> Given that people are now bringin
sco1...@gmail.com wrote:
> Unfortunately I don't no his name.
Attending a DebConf for the first time, I had this problem repeatedly.
It would be nice if questioners would introduce themselves after taking
the microphone for the first time. At larger conferences (e.g., NANOG)
this is virtually a r
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 11:49:30PM -0700, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> I would like to ask to remove the "Do not photograph me" checkbox in
> Debconf registration form as we do not really have a technology to
> implement that.
>
> While I understand and sympathize with privacy concerns that people
> h
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 08:11:11PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> I should preface this by saying that I personally don't feel that strongly
>> about this one way or the other. But it came up in another forum that
>> isn't the right place to t
also sprach Josh Triplett [2014-09-04 12:00 -0700]:
> For that matter, perhaps the conference organizers could send
> a single mail to the set of people who checked that box during
> registration, requesting input on this topic?
We could, but for what purpose? Let's just assume that 50% write
bac
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>
> +1.
>
> I'd like to add that restraining oneself from using profanity (either
> as a speaker or as an audience member) in a public venue is common
> courtesy. Similarly as we choose our words when speaking to strangers.
> I might be tempte
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:12:22PM -0700, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Josh Triplett [2014-09-04 12:00 -0700]:
> > For that matter, perhaps the conference organizers could send
> > a single mail to the set of people who checked that box during
> > registration, requesting input on this top
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:16:15PM +0200, alberto fuentes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > I'd like to add that restraining oneself from using profanity (either
> > as a speaker or as an audience member) in a public venue is common
> > courtesy. S
On 4 Sep 2014 12:21, "Josh Triplett"
> That's not what I was suggesting. I'm suggesting specifically that we
> seek input on the proposal in Aigars' mail, regarding whether photo-free
> areas and similar steps would prove sufficient for those seeking to
> avoid photography, or if not, then what ad
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:12 PM, martin f krafft wrote:
> The only thing I would like to see changed is that the photo data
> don't go to Google or Flickr or whoever else, but stay on our own
> infrastructure with a clear message that they must not appear on
> Facebook or other such thievery servic
On 13689 March 1977, Joey Hess wrote:
>> That being said, they're there as web URLs, not files; I simply forgot
>> about the web front-end.
>> Maybe it's possible to have git-annex magic some links to the mirrors
>> (CC'ed joeyh); else, I will need to poke Ganneff (also CC'ed) about
>> space usage
On Sep 4, 2014 3:42 PM, "Richard Hartmann"
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:12 PM, martin f krafft
wrote:
> > The only thing I would like to see changed is that the photo data
> > don't go to Google or Flickr or whoever else, but stay on our own
> > infrastructure with a clear message that they
also sprach Aigars Mahinovs [2014-09-04 12:33 -0700]:
> I think that is a very good idea, I was asking feedback from such
> people in the original email too, but a direct mailing with
> anonymised response would be quite nice. I will, however, take
> someone to actually do it and some time.
I can
Hi,
Thanks Russ for raising this issue, I think it's worthy of discussion.
My feeling is that completely forbidding profanity (or whatever the right word
for it is, profanity also seems wrong) doesn't benefit DebConf.
Personally, I do want people to "be excellent to each other", to treat each
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. September 2014, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> -Adult or expletive language;
> -Language which is not appropriate for an all-ages audience.
> +Insults or ad-hominem attacks;
> + We also ask you to avoid language which is not appropriate for an
> all-ages audience as mu
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014 22:13:07 +, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> My feeling is that completely forbidding profanity (or whatever the
> right word for it is, profanity also seems wrong) doesn't benefit
> DebConf.
> Personally, I do want people to "be excellent to each other", to
> treat each other
On 4 September 2014 13:38, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Aigars Mahinovs [2014-09-04 12:33 -0700]:
>> On a side note: I am note aware of any legal or privacy problems
>> occuring from uploading public CC/GPL-licensed photos to either
>> Google Plus or Flickr (paid version in both cases)
>
45 matches
Mail list logo
