On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:19:46 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010, Safir Secerovic wrote:
>
> Those seems needing some TLC to look proper at many places -- many urls
> stick out, do we really need it in the format assuming people printing
> them or making them nice for online v
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Are sources available anywhere?
> sure: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/dc10/proceedings
I guess I am lacking permissions to commit:
$> git svn dcommit
Committing to svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/dc10/proceedings ...
Use of uninitialize
On 08/13/2010 07:25 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> Chris Knadle wrote:
>
>> If you look at the signatures of my key [0x6A9FDD74], I think
>> you'll see something interesting which will also likely answer your
>> question.
>
> Hm, the signature in question is valid exactly 5 years after the
> signin
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > them or making them nice for online viewing (no empty pages, smaller
> > margins), etc.
> IMO we should make two versions available, a pdf and a html version.
I haven't done latex -> html for long time so not sure what would be a
proper solution, but
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:01 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> tth
[is dead]
> so what should be used?
tex4ht is big, bewildering and slow, but generates nice output.
>
> also, if we go with PDF without .ps/.dvi/... then why not to use
> pdflatex, then there would be no problem/necessity to
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > http://media.debconf.org/dc10/proceedings.pdf
> Could someone please jump in and improve this? Thanks.
BTW -- I don't remember what were conditions of submissions of our
abstracts to penta -- i.e.
who owns the copyright to our proceedings (respective
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:07:34 (CEST), Russ Allbery wrote:
> Holger Levsen writes:
>> On Sonntag, 15. August 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>>> Those seems needing some TLC to look proper at many places
>
>> Gee... I don't know what TLC means...
>
> "Tender loving care." In this sort of co
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> > http://media.debconf.org/dc10/proceedings.pdf
>> Could someone please jump in and improve this? Thanks.
>
> BTW -- I don't remember what were conditions of submissions of our
> abstracts
Thank you Matt!
So, within proceedings I guess it should suffice to have
Copyright (C) 2010 of respective authors. Distributed under the terms of
MIT/X11 license
right?
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> from: http://debconf10.debconf.org/cfp.xhtml
> Fine Print Publication Rights
> D
On Monday, August 16, 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 08/13/2010 07:25 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> > Chris Knadle wrote:
> >> If you look at the signatures of my key [0x6A9FDD74], I think
> >> you'll see something interesting which will also likely answer
> >> your question.
> >
> > Hm, the
> I'd appreciate other people's opinions on PhotoIDs, as I don't have
> any strong feelings about them one way or the other.
Photo IDs can be displayed with gpg (--edit-key $KEYID, showphoto).
Generally they are hard to verify without a photographic memory
if the person on the photo is not a wel
Chris Knadle writes:
Hi, Chris! I'm staying out of the policy discussion, but have some
technical comments on photo IDs.
> I don't agree with the latter reason, as I think this should be a
> personal choice and I don't think PhotoIDs are "wrong", and I'm
> annoyed that such a choice is being ma
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:37:37PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Another aspect that is troublesome are PhotoIDs in keys; several
people had them. In order to go view the PhotoIDs I opened Kleopatra
in KDE4 (4.4.5 in Sid), and when viewing a key it says this:
"At the moment, Kleopatra
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > -- many urls
> > stick out, do we really need it in the format assuming people printing
> > them or making them nice for online viewing (no empty pages, smaller
> > margins), etc.
> IMO we should make two versions available, a pdf and a html version.
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:43:01AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > them or making them nice for online viewing (no empty pages, smaller
> > > margins), etc.
> > IMO we should make two versions available, a pdf and a html version.
> I haven't do
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:00:34 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> how was abstracts.tex generated? I just wonder if there is an easy way
> to complement it with those urls pointing to penta?
>
Originally it was generated via
python ./process-abstracts.py dc10-talk-abstracts.csv | \
perl
On Monday 16 August 2010 14:37:37 Chris Knadle wrote:
...
> I'm also having trouble when attempting to use an exported secret
> subkey for signing use on a laptop. I would like to think that using
> '--export-secret-subkey' for the signing subkey and importing it on
> the laptop would be the corr
On Monday 16 August 2010 15:45:22 Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> > I'd appreciate other people's opinions on PhotoIDs, as I don't have
> > any strong feelings about them one way or the other.
>
> Photo IDs can be displayed with gpg (--edit-key $KEYID, showphoto).
I didn't think that would work withou
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:11:52 Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes:
>
> Hi, Chris! I'm staying out of the policy discussion, but have some
> technical comments on photo IDs.
>
> > I don't agree with the latter reason, as I think this should be a
> > personal choice and I don't think P
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:13:17 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...
> Most often the main tools to build that trust is a) some photo ID which
> I try to have trust in the validity of, and b) the physical presence of
> the person claiming to own the digital identy, the name, the email
> address(es) and t
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I am migrating from yoh-guest to yoh, so could you please add 'yoh'
> account to be able to contribute?
Done
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:37 -0400, Chris Knadle
wrote:
> I'd rather not change mailing lists [at least not for the overall
> discussion] -- while it sounds like it makes sense, I find that in
> practice changing mailing lists ruins the context. In this case we're
> discussing what is/was "co
> Originally it was generated via
> python ./process-abstracts.py dc10-talk-abstracts.csv | \
> perl ./tex-escape.pl
great! thanks for the information -- do you also know where
dc10-talk-abstracts.csv came from? unfortunately that .csv seems to be
laking ids to easily link it against penta's
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, David Bremner wrote:
> > great! thanks for the information -- do you also know where
> > dc10-talk-abstracts.csv came from? unfortunately that .csv seems to be
> > laking ids to easily link it against penta's pages
> I guess you might need to talk to Richard Darst (MrBeige on I
could you please look at
http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/proceedings.pdf
and state either it is an improvement (then I push) or got only worse
(then I guess should not ) ;-)
all titles of the talks should lead to corresponding penta pages (thanks
MrBeige), all emails for authors to your mail client.
Ugh. Mailed Jamie directly and didn't see that he CC:ed the list, and lost
the original email due to Mutt misconfig.
On Monday 16 August 2010 19:47:30 Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:37 -0400, Chris Knadle
wrote:
> > I'd rather not change mailing lists [at least not for the
> I'm not sure... are you talking about trust signatures?
No, normal signatures,
explained under --default-cert-level in gpg manpage.
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-dis
27 matches
Mail list logo
