On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:37 -0400, Chris Knadle <chris-deb...@coredump.us> wrote: > I'd rather not change mailing lists [at least not for the overall > discussion] -- while it sounds like it makes sense, I find that in > practice changing mailing lists ruins the context. In this case we're > discussing what is/was "correct" for a keysigning /for DebConf10/, or > "keysinging for Debian", and going to that mailing list will > automatically change the context to be "keysinging in general". I > will sign up for the gnupg-users list anyway, though, so I'm still > glad you pointed it out.
I'm not sure I understand this point. Is there something about Debian or DebConf10 that requires an alteration of how keysigning is done? While I think that context is important in keysigning (different requirements and behavior depending on level of familiarity with signee, for instance), I don't think one should approach keysigning differently just because it's in the context of Debian of DebConf10. jamie.
pgpEY5Xg5Nryq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
