On Monday 16 August 2010 16:11:52 Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Chris Knadle <chris-deb...@coredump.us> writes: > > Hi, Chris! I'm staying out of the policy discussion, but have some > technical comments on photo IDs. > > > I don't agree with the latter reason, as I think this should be a > > personal choice and I don't think PhotoIDs are "wrong", and I'm > > annoyed that such a choice is being made for me by the author of the > > tool rather than simply giving a warning. > > Agreed, though the great thing about free software is that you don't > have to be limited by the original author's vision. ;-)
I could theoretically fix the code to change it the way I like for /me/, but if I want to do this for others that gets a bit more complicated. I suppose I could discuss this with the Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers for starters, which is who is listed as maintaining the kleopatra package. > > However as I couldn't find a way of displaying the PhotoIDs to verify > > them, I also couldn't sign them. :-/ > > FWIW, GPG proper has an obscure command-line option (and corresponding > configuration file setting, which I've enabled for the time being) > --list-options=show-photos. Judit beat you to it. ;-) -- Chris _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
