> I'm not sure... are you talking about trust signatures?
No, normal signatures,
explained under --default-cert-level in gpg manpage.
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-dis
Ugh. Mailed Jamie directly and didn't see that he CC:ed the list, and lost
the original email due to Mutt misconfig.
On Monday 16 August 2010 19:47:30 Jameson Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:37 -0400, Chris Knadle
wrote:
> > I'd rather not change mailing lists [at least not for the
could you please look at
http://www.onerussian.com/tmp/proceedings.pdf
and state either it is an improvement (then I push) or got only worse
(then I guess should not ) ;-)
all titles of the talks should lead to corresponding penta pages (thanks
MrBeige), all emails for authors to your mail client.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, David Bremner wrote:
> > great! thanks for the information -- do you also know where
> > dc10-talk-abstracts.csv came from? unfortunately that .csv seems to be
> > laking ids to easily link it against penta's pages
> I guess you might need to talk to Richard Darst (MrBeige on I
> Originally it was generated via
> python ./process-abstracts.py dc10-talk-abstracts.csv | \
> perl ./tex-escape.pl
great! thanks for the information -- do you also know where
dc10-talk-abstracts.csv came from? unfortunately that .csv seems to be
laking ids to easily link it against penta's
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 14:37:37 -0400, Chris Knadle
wrote:
> I'd rather not change mailing lists [at least not for the overall
> discussion] -- while it sounds like it makes sense, I find that in
> practice changing mailing lists ruins the context. In this case we're
> discussing what is/was "co
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I am migrating from yoh-guest to yoh, so could you please add 'yoh'
> account to be able to contribute?
Done
___
Debconf-discuss mailing list
Debconf-discuss@lists.debconf.org
http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:13:17 Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
...
> Most often the main tools to build that trust is a) some photo ID which
> I try to have trust in the validity of, and b) the physical presence of
> the person claiming to own the digital identy, the name, the email
> address(es) and t
On Monday 16 August 2010 16:11:52 Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes:
>
> Hi, Chris! I'm staying out of the policy discussion, but have some
> technical comments on photo IDs.
>
> > I don't agree with the latter reason, as I think this should be a
> > personal choice and I don't think P
On Monday 16 August 2010 15:45:22 Judit Foglszinger wrote:
> > I'd appreciate other people's opinions on PhotoIDs, as I don't have
> > any strong feelings about them one way or the other.
>
> Photo IDs can be displayed with gpg (--edit-key $KEYID, showphoto).
I didn't think that would work withou
On Monday 16 August 2010 14:37:37 Chris Knadle wrote:
...
> I'm also having trouble when attempting to use an exported secret
> subkey for signing use on a laptop. I would like to think that using
> '--export-secret-subkey' for the signing subkey and importing it on
> the laptop would be the corr
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 17:00:34 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> how was abstracts.tex generated? I just wonder if there is an easy way
> to complement it with those urls pointing to penta?
>
Originally it was generated via
python ./process-abstracts.py dc10-talk-abstracts.csv | \
perl
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:43:01AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > them or making them nice for online viewing (no empty pages, smaller
> > > margins), etc.
> > IMO we should make two versions available, a pdf and a html version.
> I haven't do
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > -- many urls
> > stick out, do we really need it in the format assuming people printing
> > them or making them nice for online viewing (no empty pages, smaller
> > margins), etc.
> IMO we should make two versions available, a pdf and a html version.
Hi Chris,
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:37:37PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
Another aspect that is troublesome are PhotoIDs in keys; several
people had them. In order to go view the PhotoIDs I opened Kleopatra
in KDE4 (4.4.5 in Sid), and when viewing a key it says this:
"At the moment, Kleopatra
Chris Knadle writes:
Hi, Chris! I'm staying out of the policy discussion, but have some
technical comments on photo IDs.
> I don't agree with the latter reason, as I think this should be a
> personal choice and I don't think PhotoIDs are "wrong", and I'm
> annoyed that such a choice is being ma
> I'd appreciate other people's opinions on PhotoIDs, as I don't have
> any strong feelings about them one way or the other.
Photo IDs can be displayed with gpg (--edit-key $KEYID, showphoto).
Generally they are hard to verify without a photographic memory
if the person on the photo is not a wel
On Monday, August 16, 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On 08/13/2010 07:25 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> > Chris Knadle wrote:
> >> If you look at the signatures of my key [0x6A9FDD74], I think
> >> you'll see something interesting which will also likely answer
> >> your question.
> >
> > Hm, the
Thank you Matt!
So, within proceedings I guess it should suffice to have
Copyright (C) 2010 of respective authors. Distributed under the terms of
MIT/X11 license
right?
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> from: http://debconf10.debconf.org/cfp.xhtml
> Fine Print Publication Rights
> D
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> > http://media.debconf.org/dc10/proceedings.pdf
>> Could someone please jump in and improve this? Thanks.
>
> BTW -- I don't remember what were conditions of submissions of our
> abstracts
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:07:34 (CEST), Russ Allbery wrote:
> Holger Levsen writes:
>> On Sonntag, 15. August 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>>> Those seems needing some TLC to look proper at many places
>
>> Gee... I don't know what TLC means...
>
> "Tender loving care." In this sort of co
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > http://media.debconf.org/dc10/proceedings.pdf
> Could someone please jump in and improve this? Thanks.
BTW -- I don't remember what were conditions of submissions of our
abstracts to penta -- i.e.
who owns the copyright to our proceedings (respective
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:01 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> tth
[is dead]
> so what should be used?
tex4ht is big, bewildering and slow, but generates nice output.
>
> also, if we go with PDF without .ps/.dvi/... then why not to use
> pdflatex, then there would be no problem/necessity to
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > them or making them nice for online viewing (no empty pages, smaller
> > margins), etc.
> IMO we should make two versions available, a pdf and a html version.
I haven't done latex -> html for long time so not sure what would be a
proper solution, but
On 08/13/2010 07:25 PM, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> Chris Knadle wrote:
>
>> If you look at the signatures of my key [0x6A9FDD74], I think
>> you'll see something interesting which will also likely answer your
>> question.
>
> Hm, the signature in question is valid exactly 5 years after the
> signin
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > Are sources available anywhere?
> sure: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/dc10/proceedings
I guess I am lacking permissions to commit:
$> git svn dcommit
Committing to svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debconf-data/dc10/proceedings ...
Use of uninitialize
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:19:46 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010, Safir Secerovic wrote:
>
> Those seems needing some TLC to look proper at many places -- many urls
> stick out, do we really need it in the format assuming people printing
> them or making them nice for online v
27 matches
Mail list logo
