Goswin von Brederlow dijo [Sun, May 28, 2006 at 02:50:26AM +0200]:
> >> Is there a list of official documents (with photos) that we can consider
> >> acceptable for a KSP?. If there's not we definitely need one.
> >> However this is rather tricky because the list itself should be
> >> authenticat
Steve Langasek dijo [Sat, May 27, 2006 at 02:12:48PM -0700]:
> On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:28:35PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> > Is there a list of official documents (with photos) that we can consider
> > acceptable for a KSP?. If there's not we definitely need one.
> > However this is rathe
Dear Manoj, dear fellow DDs,
I guess I could have known that this experiment of mine would turn
into a huge thread, unfortunately extending across two mailing
lists. Thus, it is surely in order for me to apologise for being the
cause that your inboxes filled up.
I have said most of what I wanted
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 05:28:35PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> Is there a list of official documents (with photos) that we can consider
> acceptable for a KSP?. If there's not we definitely need one.
> However this is rather tricky because the list itself should be authenticated
> somehow, w
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:58:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > I'm more in favour of the trouble-maker part. I had a printed copy
> > from Anibal because I was on the road in Mexico prior to DebConf and
> > couldn't make a printout in time. If you would have asked, I would
> > have confirme
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 04:54:19PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
[snip]
> Also worth noting that Spanish driving license IDs are on that group. They
> are just (pink) cardboard with your name written in with a typewriter and
> your picture *stapled* to it. I believe that has changed
On 27 May 2006, Moritz Muehlenhoff stated:
> I'm more in favour of the trouble-maker part. I had a printed copy
> from Anibal because I was on the road in Mexico prior to DebConf and
> couldn't make a printout in time. If you would have asked, I would
> have confirmed you that I had checked the f
On 5/27/06, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Within the Schengen area (European Union plus Norway, Vatican,
> and... any others?), you travel between countries without even waving
> your passport at anybody.
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 04:04:33PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> > That being said I (personally) already decided not to sign people that
> > showed
> > me something that was *not* a passport and noted that in my KSP paper page
> > through it. Unfortunately, I'm not confindent in my ability t
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 03:09:04PM +0200, Filippo Giunchedi wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I noted down those keys I would *not* sign and didn't tell the people
> > at the KSP that I would not sign them. I guess his experiment "
Steve Langasek wrote:
> At Manoj's request, I've compiled a list of those KSP participants who, per
> my notes, I saw using photocopies that included the pre-filled checksum;
> this list is attached, for each of you to use (or not, as you wish) as input
> into your own keysigning decisions. You'll
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 05:30:23PM +0200, Luca Capello wrote:
> > FYI, Martin's explanation is at [1], which passed on Planet Debian.
> >
> > Thx, bye,
> > Gismo / Luca
> >
> > [1] http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2006.05.24-tr-id-at-keysigning
>
> FWIW, I not
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:37:48PM +0200, Amaya wrote:
> Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> > 3.- Rating for the speaker
>
> Bear in mind some talks had more than one speaker, and there should be a
> way to deal with the lightning talks too.
It's just a matter of having the questionnarie hav
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 12:33:54PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Within the Schengen area (European Union plus Norway, Vatican,
> and... any others?), you travel between countries without even waving
> your passport at anybody.
That's not fully true. You have to show your passport to the *first* cou
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 15:45 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
> > identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
> > acceptable behaviour.
>
> I don't thin
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 04:16:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The KSP was cracked, People signed a key without ever looking
> at proper, official ID. You can try and save face by calling it
> whatever you want, but that does not change the reality.
Manoj, how
On Fri, 26 May 2006, David Moreno Garza wrote:
> That's illegal actually. It is quite often to get your passport sealed
I have no idea about illegal (it might well be against some international
treaty, however), but it is very dangerous for you not to have your passport
stamped. There are very fe
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the core issue here is if we deem presenting purchased
> identification at an event designed to extend the web of trust
> acceptable behaviour.
I don't think anyone has said that it's satisfactory.
_
On 5/27/06, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Only if you are reasonably well acquinted with the English language andusual english names and nicknames.This is true. One of the people at Debconf 5 I was thinking of, whose name I absolutely have no idea of anymore, was either a n
19 matches
Mail list logo
