I am solving for a 2D cantiliever beam with a rectangular grid and
referring to step-8. The problem is because boundary id is set to 0 by
default, though I am appliying tensile force, could not obsrve any
elongation towards right end. This is seen in code vector_pbm1.cc
So tried to change boun
Dear Timo and Daniel,
I have tried to submit the job, but it stopped again at the same place:
[ 57%] Linking CXX shared library ../lib/libdeal_II.so
Attached is the error file.
Any ideas?
Anna
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
h
How hard would it be to first extend Step-57 to be non-steady, and then add
stabilization terms? My main concern is whether Newton iteration + FGMRES
approach remains the same.
I don't know how much work it will be to add a time dependence, but if you
treat the nonlinearity implicitly, and t
Ah okay, now I understand. Since the package boost (from candi) has failed
here, deal.II should have used its own bundled version I think.
If the tests are fine, then it should work.
You could switch off the package boost in the candi.cfg if you need another
run.
regards
Uwe
On Wednesday, 4
On 10/04/2017 02:37 PM, Artur Safin wrote:
Out of curiosity, there is support for saving and loading refinement
using /save_refine_flags/() and /load_refine_flags/() in the
triangulation class. Am I correct to assume that these functions are not
designed to work with a p::d::triangulation?
Daniel, Wolfgang,
Thank you for the answers!
Out of curiosity, there is support for saving and loading refinement using
*save_refine_flags*() and *load_refine_flags*() in the triangulation class.
Am I correct to assume that these functions are not designed to work with a
p::d::triangulation?
Hi Vinayak,
Indeed, something like
SOURCE_DIR + "/relative/path/to/auxiliary_files.dat"
is what you need.
Regards,
Denis.
On Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 8:37:23 PM UTC+2, Daniel Arndt wrote:
>
> Vinayak,
>
> you should be able to use the SOURCE_DIR preprocessor variable for this
> purpose.
Yes. Thanks. All tests pass.
regards.
On Wednesday, October 4, 2017 at 7:50:54 PM UTC+2, Timo Heister wrote:
>
> > My question: Does it matter if I use centos7.platform instead
> > of the linux_cluster.platform?
>
> If it works for you, then all is well of course. You should check the
> deal.I
The way I checked if they were installed was by using the "whereis"
command. That command returned the following paths.
$whereis zlib
$zlib: /usr/include/zlib.h /usr/share/man/man3/zlib.3.gz
$whereis bzip2
$bzip2: /usr/bin/bzip2 /usr/share/man/man1/bzip2.1.gz
Also, boost is available as a modul
usually it does not matter, when you specify a platform file.
But here a boost error occurs (name clash for v1.63).
I think something will be wrong in your configuration.
Do you have zlib and bzip2 installed via your system (with devel packages)
or via candi?
On Wednesday, 4 October 2017 19:50:
> I can try to submit to the queue, rather then just using the head node. Do
> you think this might help?
Yes, that is typically a good way to behave on a shared resource.
Maybe long/big running processes are killed on the login node on this
machine.
--
Timo Heister
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~
> My question: Does it matter if I use centos7.platform instead
> of the linux_cluster.platform?
If it works for you, then all is well of course. You should check the
deal.II installation by doing something like:
cd tmp/build/deal*/
make test
--
Timo Heister
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~heister
Oded,
I tried to solve a slightly modified version of step-22 and obtained strange
results. The only difference in my case with respect to step-22 is the
definition of the boundary conditions. In my case, no Dirichlet boundary
conditions are applied on the velocity. Instead of that, a pressur
On 10/04/2017 01:03 AM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote:
I rechecked after letting the program run for several time. Apparently the
DoF-number rises after some time, with a current value of 2223802 DoFs. Can
that make sense? If it makes sense, it also explains the memory consumption.
Hello all,
I have installed the candi suite on my university cluster:
https://www.tu-braunschweig.de/it/dienste/21/phoenix . However, the
platform that I had to force was the centos7.platform. Since for the
linux_cluster.platform I received the error that is mentioned at the end of
this messa
Hi Wolfgang
It seems that the NS equation solver in this gallery code is based on
projection method. The continuous Galerkin Finite Elements with high-order
stabilization is used for the level set solver though.
How hard would it be to first extend Step-57 to be non-steady, and then add
stabi
Dear Daniel,
If I type "free -h" I get the following info:
totalusedfree shared buff/cache
available
Mem: 251G 44G 23G 11G182G
164G
Swap: 11G535M 11G
I can try to submit to the queu
Hello all,
I want to set up a unit test where I read input parameters from *.prm file
and some input data from a *.data file. I have a single .cc file. Until now
without the *.data input file my unit test would run successfully via the
"Setting up testsuite in user projects -> Simple Configurat
Dear all,
I am trying to install deal.ii on a cluster.
in my University, that I can run bigger jobs with parallel computations.
I am installing library locally in my home directory.
Before configuring deal.ii, I have installed petsc, p4est-2.0 and
netcdf-cxx-4.2.
Other necessary libraries were
I rechecked after letting the program run for several time. Apparently the
DoF-number rises after some time, with a current value of 2223802 DoFs. Can
that make sense? If it makes sense, it also explains the memory consumption.
Am Dienstag, 3. Oktober 2017 17:24:42 UTC+2 schrieb Maxi Miller:
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
