On 02/20/2017 07:22 PM, Lars Corbijn van Willenswaard wrote:
Thanks for the reply. I tested the change and it did not work, as
get_generalized_face_support_points() is also empty. The cause seems that
FESystem doesn't initialize the generalized_face_support_points. To test that
I added some code
Thanks for the reply. I tested the change and it did not work, as
get_generalized_face_support_points() is also empty. The cause seems that
FESystem doesn't initialize the generalized_face_support_points. To test
that I added some code to initialize it when
initialize_unit_face_support_points() 'fa
Problem solved! Thank you all : )
On Monday, February 20, 2017 at 7:58:49 PM UTC-3, Uwe Köcher wrote:
>
> Dear Chao,
>
> you may check also our download page https://www.dealii.org/download.html
>
> There we have an additional list for installers and binary packages.
>
> I suggest that you are on
After a bit of digging, I think the following happens. The basis for the
problem is a system of RaviarThomas + DGQ. The RaviarThomas element has no
support points, but has dofs_per_face. Therefore the same applies to the
FESystem, which therefore triggers the above mentioned error.
Interesting
Dear Chao,
you may check also our download page https://www.dealii.org/download.html
There we have an additional list for installers and binary packages.
I suggest that you are on a linux machine,
then you should take a look into our automated build script (with system
package installation note
Dear Martin,
Thank you, that makes sense.
If I could trouble you with one more question -- I'm having a hard time
using AlignedVector, and I can't find any examples of its use online.
I'd like to build the AlignedVector with a series of push backs, but I get
compiler errors if I try this:
dea
Dear Stephen,
The problem is data alignment: You create an std::vector
that internally arranges its data under the assumption that the start
address of FEEvaluation is divisible by 32 (the length of the
vectorization). If you put an FEEvaluation object on the stack, the
compiler will automati
Hello,
I recently realized that I should be using "-march=native" flag for optimal
performance of matrix-free codes. The application that I've been using
works fine with just SSE2, but with AVX enabled I'm getting a segfault.
Step-48 works fine, so I don't think it is an installation issue.
The
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017, at 07:27 CST, Chao wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> I did as you said, namely calling cmake with a path to the 'source' folder
> while the current directory is 'build'. However, it still didn't work.
> Here's the error message:
>
> -- This is CMake 3.7.1
> [...]
You need to in
Unfortunately, I wasn't able to figure it out. I have posted an Issue on
github.
Kent
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
Leon,
yes, each block in a BlockSparseMatrix is in fact a
SparseMatrix. You can use something like
BlockMatrixArray to compose sparse matrices into a different
block structure without copying the matrices.
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:50 AM, wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I'm working on some monolithic a
Dear all,
I'm working on some monolithic and partitioned schemes of FSI problem. In a
monolithic scheme, the matrix usually consists both fluid and structure
parts. However in a partitioned scheme, we can use two matrices which
represent the fluid and structure separably. I would like to extrac
Hi Matthias,
I did as you said, namely calling cmake with a path to the 'source' folder
while the current directory is 'build'. However, it still didn't work.
Here's the error message:
-- This is CMake 3.7.1
--
-- Include
/Users/John/Documents/dealii-8.4.1/cmake/setup_external_macros.cmake
Thanks. It works perfectly.
Regards, Sebas
El lunes, 20 de febrero de 2017, 12:52:36 (UTC+1), Luca Heltai escribió:
>
> You should add a
>
> USER root
>
>
>
> USER dealii
>
> In the docker file before and after the install commands.
>
> Luca
>
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 12:47, Sebastian.Gonzalez
You should add a
USER root
USER dealii
In the docker file before and after the install commands.
Luca
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 12:47, Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor
> wrote:
>
> Hi Luca!
>
> I have tried and I do not know what I am missing. I have a makefile like this
>
> all: build
>
> b
Hi Luca!
I have tried and I do not know what I am missing. I have a makefile like
this
all: build
build:
docker build -t new-dealii .
and the Dockerfile as follows
$ more Dockerfile
#Dockerfile
FROM dealii/dealii:v8.4.2-gcc-mpi-fulldepsmanual-debugrelease
RUN apt-get update
RUN apt-g
Yes.
You should write a Dockefile with your instructions. See, for example, the
Dockefile for deal2lkit (github).
Luca
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:58, Sebastian.Gonzalez-Pintor
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello!
>
> I am trying with the docker containers of dealii, so I downloaded one of them
> and then
Hello!
I am trying with the docker containers of dealii, so I downloaded one of
them and then I ran it
$ docker pull dealii/dealii:v8.4.2-gcc-mpi-fulldepsmanual-debugrelease
$ docker run -i -t dealii/dealii:v8.4.2-gcc-mpi-fulldepsmanual-debugrelease
Now I want to install few things in the cont
18 matches
Mail list logo
