Has anybody compiled dbmail on freebsd before?
As I said before I was able to finally build dbmail with freebsd. I then
followed all the instructions in the INSTALL file and but despite following
them to the letter I was not able to get postfix deliver mail to
dbmail-smtp until I added my domain to the postfix config file. That seems
odd to
At 12:07 PM 12/15/2002 -0800, you wrote:
So to say, edit main.c and change
char *configFile = "dbmail.conf";
to
char *configFile = "/etc/dbmail.conf";
Ok I'll try that next.
Just to let you guys know what has been happening so far.
I changed the entry in main.c from dbmail.conf to /usr/local/etc/dbmail.com
(which is where it would normally lie in freebsd). Little did I know that
imap C file had the value hardcoded as /etc/dbmail.conf. SO I changed
main.c to /etc/
reate folders. I believe this has been
discussed on the mailing list, but if anyone remembers the answer
offhand, that could save me some searching. Thanks in advance.
--tim
Quoth Matthew T. O'Connor:
> Not true, postgres never suffered that limitation since it always has
> (and still d
How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog?
It just will not peep down. I set TRACE_LEVEL to 5, then 1, then 0...
no good. I guess I can just stop syslog from listening to mail.* ...
--
"It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand.
I j
>
> >
> > How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog?
> >
> > It just will not peep down. I set TRACE_LEVEL to 5, then 1, then 0...
> > no good. I guess I can just stop syslog from listening to mail.* ...
>
> try TRACE_LEVER = 2
Ah yes, that is what it was original
Yes, I reaped and restarted dbmail-imapd.
Quoth Roel Rozendaal - IC&S:
> you do restart the daemons i assume?
>
> Tim heeft op maandag, 31 maa 2003 om 16:31 (Europe/Amsterdam) het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> >
> > How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing
Quoth Roel Rozendaal - IC&S:
> Well i just killed a little bug (cvs has been updated) that caused the
> daemons to ignore the -f option - reverting to the default
> (/etc/dbmail.conf). Could be that your problem is solved now. On our
> systems the trace_level option works just fine; setting it t
Rad! This is awesome.
Thanks! Ya'll just chopped my system load by 19.5 times :-)
Now if I can get that new MX record propagated without Network Solutions
destroying the zone again... we discovered that their creepy
'60-days-since-a-change' policy about transferring domains (to, say,
Joker.com,
Quoth Roel Rozendaal - IC&S:
> Well i just killed a little bug (cvs has been updated) that caused the
> daemons to ignore the -f option - reverting to the default
> (/etc/dbmail.conf). Could be that your problem is solved now. On our
> systems the trace_level option works just fine; setting it t
rom within Squirrelmail -- am I retarded?!?
Once more for emphasis, dbmail is a great product and has a wonderful
community of people around it. Thanks yet again.
--tim
Quoth Jeff Brenton:
> Hello Tim,
>
> T> Do I deal with our ISP's badly-run BIND servers, or do I roll the dice
>
personally I would suggest amavisd + clamav + SpamAssassin -- the
documentation is clear and straightforward, the entire thing can be
integrated into a single startup script (along with your postfix and
dbmail processes), and the performance is amazing when you use a RAMdisk
for the scrubbing.
I c
yeah, sure. here's my transport.cf:
user = [username]
password = [password]
dbname = climb
hosts = rockclimbing.com
table = postfix_transport
select_field = transport
where_field = domain
schema:
CREATE TABLE postfix_transport (
id int(7) NOT NULL auto_increment,
domain varchar(40) NOT NULL
Quoth the one known as lou...
> I dont know if anyone looked at http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html.
> Topic "Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, Razor and DCC"
> I dont think it will be hard to work out how to impl dbmail in this setup.
Yes! This is an awesome howto and describes (much better
Yeah, I started to notice this a while ago with my own mailbox.
Fortunately, I use Mutt :-). Never did solve the problem though.
I have the luxury of being an admin rather than a customer :-/
Quoth James XMS:
> One of my customers has a mailbox with around 10,000 messages in the inbox
> with
Quoth Marten Klencke:
> Today I've finally converted the CVS repository to Subversion, which is
> intended to be used for further development. The repository is accessible
> at (which can also be viewed using a web browser):
>
> https://svn.ic-s.nl/svn/dbmail/
Wow, that rules. I have some patche
Cool -- I took the first few steps (publishing SPF records for
rockclimbing.com, setting up policyd for Postfix 2.1) but this guide
will really help take the final step. Thanks so much!
--tim
Quoth [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> FYI:
> Anyone interested in enabling SPF (plus MS CALLER-ID if d
Quoth Dominic Amann:
> I am currently running dbmail-mysql version 1.2.11-1, with dbmail-imapd
> and postfix on a production server. I am debating whether to upgrade to
> 2.0.3, and I would need a few questions answered to make this decision:
>
> 1. Is 2.0.3 stable (compared to 1.2.11)?
in my e
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
You fail to mention how you are trying to build 1.0, with the old build
system, with the build.sh script for 1.0 or the autoconf in 1.0?
Sorry I was using build.sh
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
m
windows. Since webmin can connect to it as well I figure it's some weird
problem but I probably don't need to worry about it yet. Is this a myodbc
problem or what?
Thanks.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
ectly that's great.
Have you thought of using a non IMAP client for employees which taps into
the database directly? I was thinking that might be good way to go internal
employees and it would bypass whatever IMAP slowness there might be.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Dilig
r postgres. I
have no idea if qmail is able to read from a database.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
AIL PROTECTED]
to show up in the postfix log file. How should I change these aliases?
--
Tim Jackson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The day will come when the who, what, when, where, and why. Will be the
me, this, now, here, and think of something quick. On this day it will
be our wits that are our salvation, not our faith.
Works great here.
https://mail.idge.net/
L/P: bleh
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 22:09:27 -0600 (CST)
"shon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is dbmail-imapd not compatable w/ squirrelmail? will it not work at all or
> are there only certain features that don't work?
>
> thanks,
> shon
>
> --
> "power off
ocal recipient table;
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> proto=SMTP helo=
>
> any ideas? also, where can i view dbmail-smtp trace data?
>
> --
> "power off einstein" - moe syzlak
>
>
>
> ___
> Dbmail mailing l
I don't know if anybody has already done this or not but be sure to change
the postgresql schema file. Currently you are specifying a DATETIME field
when it should be TIMESTAMP. DATETIME is not a valid postgresql field type.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
At 09:29 AM 2/5/2003 +0100, you wrote:
works on my postgresql.. I'm using 7.2.1; i tried the following in the
psql program:
It did not work on 7.3.1. Perhaps they changed it.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
fixed.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
n the rest of
the groupware tools.
The feb issue of Linux Journal had a nice article on reverse engineering of
exchange. IMAP was a part of it but there are other parts as well (as I am
sure you are aware). If you have not read it yet you want to pick up an issue.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investiga
gging the CPU once.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
confused over wether it might work
or wether it might break the postfix/dbmail duo.
There is no reason why you can't run a virus scanner before you hand off
the email to dbmail. Just use procmail or maildrop.
--
Tim Uckun
M
too.
BTW thanks for all the postfix-mysql instructions I have been struggling
with exim-postgres and dbmail and I am tempted to switch to postfix-postgres.
:wq
Tim Uckun
US Investigations Services/Due Diligence
http://www.diligence.com/
. The maildrop filter then can look at the mail and
deliver it to dbmail-smtp with the command line arguments for user and mailbox.
--
Tim Uckun
Mobile Intelligence Unit.
--
"There are
1) maildircmd for doing this on-disk and then injecting with
dbmail-smtpd (Google it!)
2) imapsync for syncing mailboxes via imap
I'm using maildircmd myself.
On Friday, April 25, 2003, at 04:19 PM, Cedric Veilleux wrote:
Hi,
I don't think this will work for qmail / courier maildir style
w bugs are fixed. (SquirrelMail has many issues with DBmail, but
none have proven to be showstoppers so far).
Quoth William Miller:
> hi Tim,
> if you ever do (or did) that write up, I would LOVE a copy...
>
> thanks heaps in advance,,
>
> will :)
>
> - Orig
can just add more aliases for everyone, but i wanted to know why
this was happening, rather than just fudge a fix for it.
thanks
tim
dbmail-imapd seems to die the instant a connection is made. So there is no
way to retreive the emails. Has anyone else had a similiar problem.
Tim
dbmail/imap4d[14612]: CreateSocket(): socket
IP requested [*] OK
syslog:Nov 10 10:22:41 admin dbmail/imap4d[14612]: CreateSocket(): could
not bind address to socket
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 08:59, Tim Gurney wrote:
> > dbmail-imapd se
ok, what i had done was changed the /usr/sbin/imapd to
/usr/sbin/dbmail-imapd, if i have disable=yes, i dont see how the dbmail
imap server can work ?
Tim
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Jeff Brenton wrote:
> Hello Tim,
>
> TG> syslog:Nov 10 10:22:41 admin dbmail/imap4d[14612]: CreateSocket()
thanks to both people :)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Christian G. Warden wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 03:23:54PM +0000, Tim Gurney wrote:
> > ok, what i had done was changed the /usr/sbin/imapd to
> > /usr/sbin/dbmail-imapd, if i have disable=yes, i dont see how the dbmail
> >
Sorry,_no_mailbox_here_by_that_name._(#5.1.1)/
@40003fafa08b1c3438f4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@40003fafa08b1c69104c bounce msg 176951 qp 6530
Thats what i get whenever i try to send an email locally, it isnt
stripping the dbmail- part off as the .qmail file should. any suggestions
?
Tim
Ok,
after a further dig into the setup, i am happy that the mail is handling
the virtualdomains correctly, if i send an email to tim, it goes into the
logs as dbmail-tim, this sahould then go via the .qmail in the dbmail home
dir and pass it to dbmail-smtp, but i am fairly sure that this is not
rry for the all dumb questions :)
and THANKS for all the info guys much apprecaited
Tim
If there a way to strip out attachments and store these in a separate
table or outside of the DB.
I want to be able to use the DB for search purposes and having to search
through all the attachments esp in word or similiar is pointless and adds
extra time to the searching.
Tim
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Simon Gray wrote:
> > If there a way to strip out attachments and store these in a separate
> > table or outside of the DB.
>
> I guess it would be possible, however you'd need to change the code so
> instead of placing any attachments in the messageblks table, place them in
+textbody.
Tim
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, [iso-8859-1] Bj?rn Knudsen wrote:
> Would'nt that require a prasing of the mime content and not just the mail
> header as it does today?..
> This doesnt sound like a simple rewrite.. I think you'r better off by doing
> this mime prasing on
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Simon Gray wrote:
> > Would'nt that require a prasing of the mime content and not just the mail
> > header as it does today?..
> Would need to parse the mime content and seperate them accordingly
>
> > This doesnt sound like a simple rewrite.. I think you'r better off by
> do
>
> But why do it on the server? i've got a quick and dirty php script i wrote a
> while ago which will pull an email in via pop and write it to a local db.
> Although i never did seperate the email contents/attachments, you'd still
> need to do that.
> Would definatly be easier than rewriting dbma
Roel,
thanks for reply that solves a lot of issues, if you skipp the attachments
during the search then i dont need to worry about stripping them :)
Tim
> I'll rephrase my original response.
>
> 'Why do it in dbmail?'
>
> I understand having it server side as in having access the database. But
> adding extra work to the email service/daemon/process/MTA/MDA whatever you
> want to call it. Just creates unnecessary overhead. When you could just talk
>
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Nunno Luca wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> How can i redirect all mail for a domain to one user ?
> I remember that i can use "@domain.com" as alias for a user, but don't
> works.
@domain.com is the catch all for the domain i beleive, so anything that
doesnt go to someone else will go
yes, we use it that way all the time on rockclimbing.com.
out of sheer laziness I have begun to implement a system for routing
dbmail aliases selectively into phpbb forums; I was not thrilled
with the idea of setting up mailman, ezmlm, etc.
but yes the aliases work great for mailing lists and if
Wow, that's really rad. This should speed things up a ton!
Thanks so much for the great work you guys do. I plan for us to add
*something* hopefully significant for this. If you need a server or
just cash please specify. Or a patch, but we'd rather send cash ;-)
Quoth Magnus Sundberg:
> Kasp
d00d, use Postfix, I swear on a stack of bibles you will be glad of
it :-)
Many more people on the list will be able to assist you then.
Quoth Marc Hultquist:
> MessageOk
>
> Well the problem I am having is, I have setup dbmail and I can login to the
> pop3d fine.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet
Quoth Michiels Tom (Uptime):
>
> Does anybody knows about a good management interface to db-mail? I know
> there was a php project but this turned into coldfusion... Which I can't
> run on my webserver.
define 'management'... I wrote a tool to handle aliases, forwards,
etc. in PHP but it's hardly
I'm having a similar problem, only, in my installation it appears
that multi-recipient emails are being queued forever by postfix and
then growing the dbmail-lmtpd process to an obscene size.
It is very bizarre, and actually gets worse (uses more resources) if
I specify dbmail-smtp as the transp
Paul J Stevens wrote:
One bottleneck in delivery is that we treat message insertion as one
single transaction. Also, the total number of queries used, will most
likely leave room for improvement. But 1k/s seems pretty fast.
Posted as much to check posting to list works and to raise a chuckle.
Michael Monnerie wrote:
I just found a nice SELECT which shows the size of the database you are
connected to. For my dbmail, it reads this. dbmail_headervalue is about
1/3 of the whole e-mail size, can this be reduced? Is dbmail2.3 saving
space only for message parts, or for headervalues also?
60 matches
Mail list logo
