ybe it's something else.
But I am out of ideas at this stage.
gratefull for any help,
Peter.
Thanks Roel,
it did compile properly when I repositioned the $xxx_LDFLAGS variables in
all 9 cases.
I could not have done it without your suggestion.
Is it worth giving the makefile generation process a little attention so
this
problem is solved for all users, not just you and me?
Peter
Roel
This is good news for us new to the program.
Thanks you for fixing this.
Peter
Ilja Booij wrote:
> We've finally found the fix to the linking problem!
>
> Some small changes in Makefile.am did the trick :)
>
> The fixes are in CVS, and will be in the next release (of course..)
>
> Bye,
> Ilja
Why don't you use pop before smtp ?
It is inbuilt in dbmail and preffered by the users cause they do not have to
type/remember passwords.
BIVOL
- Original Message -
From: Chris Nolan
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 12:05 PM
Subject: [Dbmail] Postfix 2.0 + DBMail + S
Hi,
I am trying to setup auto replies with dbmail.
I use the table auto_replies. Everything seems to work just fine but how do
I set the From: header
in auto_reply emails. Now it simply omits that header.
Thanks in advance fro your help.
Kind regards,
Peter
Hi,
get
www.squirrelmail.org
it simply rocks and works with dbmail :-)
Peter Zyumbilev
Project Manager
Mansion Productions Inc.
Phone: 1-888-261-9749
Fax: 1 - 310 - 362 - 8605
AIM: peterZmansion
YMS: peterZmansion
MSN: peterZmansion
Skype: peterZmansion
ICQ: 108984925
support
Hi,
I am still looking for an answer of the question how do I set the From:
header of the auto_reply message in dbmail ?
Anyone ?
Ilja any hint ?
Please help...
Best regards,
Peter Zyumbilev
Project Manager
Mansion Productions Inc.
Phone: 1-888-261-9749
Fax: 1 - 310 - 362 - 8605
AIM
Hey,
Thanks for your help. I really appreciate it :-)
I use postfix and will dig in postfix docs(at least postfix has such)
Once again thanks,
Peter
- Original Message -
From: "Feargal Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist&
Hi,
It is not working for me :(((
when I press view all users, user info etc it just reloads the page :(((
any ideas ?
Best regards,
Peter Zyumbilev
Project Manager
Mansion Productions Inc.
AIM: peterZmansion
YMS: peterZmansion
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skype: peterZmansion
ICQ: 108984925
.
But It can be called only by root. But web server is not working as root.
I guess it can be fixed by enabling susexec on the server , but I prefer not do
so.
Best regards,
Peter Zyumbilev
Project Manager
Mansion Productions Inc.
AIM: peterZmansion
YMS: peterZmansion
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Dbmail is working just fine :-)
To see what I am talking about try execute dbmail-adduser under command line as
REGULAR user, not ROOT.
Web server is running as regular user , not root.
Best regards,
Peter Zyumbilev
Project Manager
Mansion Productions Inc.
AIM: peterZmansion
YMS
Thanks Paul :-)
That is the case - I use Debian:-)
I gave web server rights to read dbmail.conf and now it works :-)
Peter
- Original Message -
From: Paul J Stevens
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; DBMail mailinglist
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:12 AM
Subject: Re: [DbMail] XHTML
That tutorial misses entries in /etc/postfix/transport
Type in it:
yourdomain.comdbmail::
Then is shell type:
postmap transport
And should be fine :-)
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kirti S. Bajwa
>
/MYSQL_README.html
This is POSTFIX how-to for that :)
Peter
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Kirti S. Bajwa
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 12:03 AM
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE:d
Hello All,
I'm setting up DBmail with postfix at my company. With the database
functionality (postgres at this site) it seemed a natural fit for multiple
users. Since we have multiple users we would like to the functionality for
each user to set up their own whitelist, the belief is that bla
ould be greatly appreciated.
Thank you
Peter
Peter Vazquez wrote:
Hello All,
I'm setting up DBmail with postfix at my company. With the database
functionality (postgres at this site) it seemed a natural fit for
multiple users. Since we have multiple users we would like to the
functionality
broken, or is there some third option I'm not seeing? :)
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Peter Darley
Ilja,
So, does this mean that my client (outlook) isn't sending the correct
commands when I delete something, or is it operator error (should I be doing
something to trigger the delete)?
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
e() or something similar, is that likely
to screw anything up? It seems to me that it would be pretty benign.
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ilja Booij
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 8:31 AM
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject:
ed to send it to each
child?
Thanks,
Peter Darley
John,
Thanks a bunch for these! Very useful.
I would be interested in getting these scripts with the source. Is
there a
contrib or something for dbmail?
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John M. Brown
Folks,
I'm having a hard time find out how to set up smtp-auth with Postfix and
DBMail. Anyone got any pointers?
Thanks,
Peter Darley
Folks,
I'm using PostgreSQL, rather than MySQL. :(
I know there's a PostgreSQL PAM, I'll look into them. If I figure this
out
with PostgreSQL I'll post some notes.
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Will,
I know that on PostgreSQL it will only waste one bit per row if there's
a
null in a field. I assume that MySQL does something similar. It doesn't
seem like it would that big a deal (unless MySQL is even worse than people
say).
Thanks,
Peter Darley
-Original Message
ived it. This would probably do what you
want. The only question then is: how does it interact with the imap stuff?
Will dbmail pop3 send mail that's not in the inbox? Does moving mail to a
different folder give it a new unique id? I'm sure someone here can answer
that.
Thanks,
Peter
hat has it's deliver_to
set to '|/var/mailman/mail/wrapper post gaming', and it doesn't seem to do
anything whatsoever. I couldn't find any info on what the format for
delivery of mail to external programs, so I'm even sure if this is formatted
correctly.
I appreciate anyone's help. :)
Thanks,
Peter Darley
boxes.
Is that possible to do through the aliases table? If not, how would I
go
about it?
Thanks,
Peter Darley
Will,
Thanks a bunch. For some reason I was thinking there was a unique
index on
alias, but obvously I was mistaken. :)
Thanks,
Peter D.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Will Berry
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 12:09 PM
To: DBMail
left on the
system. This time I just dumped the database, re-installed and restored the
db. No hassle, no pain. :)
Thanks for all the work that y'all have put into DBMail!
Thanks,
Peter Darley
d all go
into the system mailbox. If this will work with certain patterns but not
with others, that's OK, I can make my addresses fit whatever works.
Thanks,
Peter Darley
Paul,
I'm not sure why it's an MTA issue. DBMail makes the decision weather
to
accept mail for a specific address, and decides which mailbox to put the
mail into. It seems like what I'm wanting to do here is exactly what dbmail
is in charge of.
Thanks,
Peter Darley
might not be possible at all due to password storing requirements -
afaik samba requires clear texts stored in LDAP.
So my question is - can this be done at all? Have a password change on
samba be reflected in dbmail and vice versa? If yes - is there any
documentation on the LDAP + dbmail subject?
Peter
Hi. I'm recently started using DBMail, but now I've run into a problem with
server side sorting. I'm using DBMail 2.2.2, mySQL 5.0.26 and Squirrelmail
1.4.9a. When I activate server side sorting and try to sort my mails in
Squirrelmail according to date they don't sort correctly. After a mail date
understood everything. I
am using gmime 2.1.19 though. Can that be a problem?
--
/Peter Welzien
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Server-side-sorting-doesn%27t-sort-dates-correctly-tf3210362.html#a8922953
Sent from the dbmail users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
x27;s one of the mails: http://www.nabble.com/file/6447/99 99
I've upgraded to gmime 2.2.3. But I guess I won't notice any differences
unless I remigrate all the mails?
--
/Peter Welzien
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Server-side-sorting-doesn%27t-sort-dates-correctl
n see, recent_flag is listed twice in the UPDATE statement.
This is dbmail-2.2.4 with postgresql-server-8.2.3 on a 6.2-RELEASE-p2
FreeBSD (i386) machine.
Please feel free to contact me if you need more details.
Thanks in advance, Bye
Ollie
--
Oliver PETER, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ICQ# 1139
-
I still get mail. What is the reason for this? A full trace follows.
Thanks
Peter
Apr 16 07:46:40 Arzamas dbmail/imap4d[18577]: Info:[serverchild]
serverchild.c,select_and_accept(+252): received connection
Apr 16 07:46:40 Arzamas dbmail/imap4d[18577]: Info:[serverchild]
serverchild.c
Hello,
I have some trouble understanding the difference between the alias and
forward mechanisms in dbmail. I am probably confused by the fact that
/etc/aliases handles both in the same manner, making an alias a specific
case of forwarding. How is dbmail different?
Thanks
Peter
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 18:49 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>
>> I have some trouble understanding the difference between the alias and
>> forward mechanisms in dbmail. I am probably confused by the fact that
>> /etc/aliases handles both in the same m
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 18:45 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> Aaron Stone wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2007-04-21 at 18:49 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have some trouble understanding the difference between the alias and
>>&
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 00:00 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>
>> I didn't know Sieve is _that_ powerful. Thanks for pointing this out.
>> But imho a possibility to say with a single forward rule "user bob gets
>> all mail that user alice ge
Hi,
Is DBMail capable of sending mail to a subfolder? What would be the
extension syntax?
Thanks!
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2007, Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is DBMail capable of sending mail to a subfolder? What would be the
>> extension syntax?
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Delivery to username+folder/[EMAIL
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Thats interesting Aaron,
>
> Acording to you, i could send email to my "MySQL" folder on this account
> like:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]@decimal.pt
More like this: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We were actually discussing how to send mail to a _subfolder_ of the
folder MySQL.
_
#x27; should enjoy the
same functionality as alice aliased as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. My 2 cents.
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:12:16 -0400
> DTK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Upgraded to 2.2.5 works fine now
>> Thanks Paul
>
> I think you meant 2.2.4. For a moment, you got me worried that I somehow
> missed the 2.2.5 release notice or something. :)
>
Weird, although the
I provide to help you guys zap this one?
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
applications
> apply to us as well:
> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/guides/optimisation/Massif.html
I see. I will give it a shot, will let you know if I can't get the hang
of it. Thanks for the pointers!
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmai
the migration is a must.
Thanks for any help/pointers.
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Daniel Kasak wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> There is a raging memory leak in dbmail-imapd that manifests itself
>> after about an hour of heavy usage (imapsync on huge mailboxes). Once
>> the leak awakes it grows at about 200k per _second_. I
Ouch, I forgot the list is too helpful by adjusting the reply-to :)
Excuse the noise.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
In case that encoding=utf8, what collation does dbmail expect in the
mysql database? Does it matter if it is any of the case insensitive ones
or should it be the bin? Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> In case that encoding=utf8, what collation does dbmail expect in the
> mysql database? Does it matter if it is any of the case insensitive ones
> or should it be the bin? Thanks
>
To answer my own question: I tried with utf8_bin, and g
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:15 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>>> In case that encoding=utf8, what collation does dbmail expect in the
>>> mysql database? Does it matter if it is any of the case insensitive ones
>>&
Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 12:44 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> Aaron Stone wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2007-05-12 at 11:15 +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>>>> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>>>>> In case that encoding=utf8, what collation does dbmai
Excuse the n00b question, but what is the correct name for the latin-1
encoding (want to set it for default_msg_encoding)?
'latin1'
or
'latin-1'
or are they aliases?
Thanks
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/list
Niki Guldbrand wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was wondering if it possible to define the names of the tables used by
> dbmail, like you can define the table prefix ?
>
The configuration parameter 'table_prefix' in the '[DBMAIL]' section of
the config file (/etc/dbmail/dbmail.conf) does just that.
_
Niki Guldbrand wrote:
> On Sun, 13 May 2007 22:11:56 +0200
> Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I was wondering if it possible to define the names of the tables used by
>>> dbmail, like you can define the table prefix ?
>> The configuration p
Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
>> We issue only a "SET NAMES 'encoding'" without the COLLATION argument,
>> so at the moment we fall onto whatever default the database has, but...
>>
>> Unless Paul changed any queries with the major utf8 cleanup today, the
>> database collation doesn't
a `ps aux` showing the fat process
dbmail.err - a level 5 trace of the entire process
the valgrind/massif output for all dbmail processes
I understand that this is way too much information, but hopefully you
can just glance at it and tell me right away what I should do next.
Thanks for the
Leif Jackson wrote:
> Peter Rabbitson wrote:
>> Aaron Stone wrote:
>>
>>> First let's look at some debug logs and see what's going on. Maybe the
>>> program is caught in a tight loop somewhere? If there's a particular
>>> IMAP comman
Aaron Stone wrote:
> Ah, sorry, forgot to mention that it requires an autoreconf.
How do I do that? I installed the autoconf and automake debian packages
(sid) and I get this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/devel/dbmail$ autoreconf
/usr/share/aclocal/smpeg.m4:13: warning: underquoted definition of
AM_PATH_S
Aaron Stone wrote:
> Looks like we were not correctly freeing the lists returned by
> g_list_slices. I've updated dbmail-imapsession.c, dbmail-mailbox.c, and
> db.c with a fix. Hopefully imapsync users will feel less pain. Please
> test out SVN and let me know!
>
> Aaron
>
It does not seem like
Hi Aaron,
Here are the new test results for revision 2574:
http://rabbit.us/pool/misc/dbmail_bug584_memchek_svn2574.tar.bz2. Let me
know if I can provide anything else.
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl
Hi. I'm writing a webmail application that works directly with the
SQL-server. I'm wondering what the correct way to mark a message as
deleted is. Is it enough to set deleted_flag=1 in dbmail_messages or
should I also set status=2?
--
/Pet
Peter Welzien wrote:
Hi. I'm writing a webmail application that works directly with the
SQL-server.
Actually a question to the authors: Paul, Aaron, are you as religious
about the DBMail internals as Wietse Venema is about the postfix queue? :)
Joking aside - is the internal format consi
Jesse Norell wrote:
And if anyone is into dbmail-util, lets not forget bug id 305 .. I think
it's managed to slip by unaddressed for well over a full year now
(acknowledged, high priority and several sql solutions listed in the
report).
Neither this issue:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Tom Allison wrote:
My point also. Doing sha1 on the whole file seems to make the most sense. People
who want to do bigger files faster can simply add more lmtpd hosts with bigger
cpus and more ram.
Why is the hashing performance penalty considered such an issue? All of
.
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Hello all,
This is not strictly a DBMail question, but it is close. Lately I
noticed that any time the SQL server needs to be restarted for some
reason, DBMail starts having problems with inserting messages. Since
the error message was changed to
Charles Marcus wrote:
This is not strictly a DBMail question, but it is close. Lately I
noticed that any time the SQL server needs to be restarted for some
reason, DBMail starts having problems with inserting messages. Since
the error message was changed to 450 from 503, this is not a big
issu
Daniel Kasak wrote:
Hi all.
I've been using mysqldump ( and the binary logs ) to backup our
databases, including dbmail.
This works, but restores are *incredibly* slow. We've got almost 20GB of
email.
Have you looked at LVM snapshots? The idea is basically to have your
entire Database on a L
Hi,
Sorry for hijacking the thread. Can someone clarify what is the
advantage of using innodb_file_per_table versus one infinitely growing
tablespace?
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo
Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
Summarizing everything:
- If you have a single DB server: use a shared InnoDB tablespace
preallocating the space and disabling the autoextend. Using the optimize
table will give you a better optimization of the tables, and you'll have no
problem with the space as it
-users[26667]: Debug:[auth]
authsql.c,auth_check_user_ext(+222): checking user [(null)] in alias
table
Segmentation fault
so it seams auth_check_user_ext is forgotting user2
--
Peter Hochgemuth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Ok, forget about my intention. The problem is worse:
$ dbmail-users -x [EMAIL PROTECTED] -t [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
$ dbmail-users -l
-- users --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@__:x:1:0:0.00:0.00:
__public__:x:3:0:0.00:0.00:
anyone:x:2:0:0.00:0.00:
-- forwards --
Segmentation fault
Where comes th
4]: Debug:[auth]
authsql.c,auth_check_user_ext(+222): checking user [(null)] in alias
table
Segmentation fault
Am Dienstag, den 07.08.2007, 20:21 + schrieb Aaron Stone:
> Can you run dbmail-user under gdb and get a backtrace? Let me know if you
> need some help doing this.
>
>
FAIL.
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Aaron Stone wrote:
Please post a level 5 trace so that we can see if the lookup code is
running or not.
Here is the entire setup:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dbmail-users -l
-- users --
anyone:x:2:0:0.00:0.00:
tester:x:4:0:0.00:0.00:test@
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@__:x:1:0:0.00:0.00:
__public__:x:3:0:0.00:0
Hi,
I found the bug in the sqlite implementation of db_set_result_set() and
fixed it. Maybe somebody can check this in into SVN.
The patch is
#! /bin/sh /usr/share/dpatch/dpatch-run
## 04_dbsqlite.dpatch by
##
## All lines beginning with `## DP:' are a description of the patch.
## DP:
## DP: [s
all mail coming from dbmail, since it was scanned once
when it got into dbmail already.
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Aaron Stone wrote:
Please post a level 5 trace so that we can see if the lookup code is
running or not.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2007, Peter Rabbitson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Hi,
I was wondering what happened with the issue discussed here:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dbmail/8068
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Mmm, the rfc is less than clear imo. I'll take Arnts word for it.
I'll fix this asap.
Hi Paul,
Just saw the rc3 announcement. Does it include the stuff quoted above,
or it is left for rc4?
Thanks
Peter
___
DBma
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Hi all,
Let's roll another one.
changes since rc3:
- HARD_MAX_CHILDREN was increased from 200 to 300. Not as significant as
I would like, but increasing it much beyond caused new problems I rather
not have to deal with right now.
- build on OSX with gcc should work now as
Hi,
Is there a reason why most of the options in dbmail.conf are in
UPPERCASE whereas some are lower case? Is there some significance like
mainstream/experimental option or it is just a mess that has not been
cleared yet?
Thanks
___
DBmail mailing
Hi,
I would like to know what software was used to draw/generate this:
http://www.dbmail.org/dokuwiki/lib/exe/detail.php?id=er-model&cache=cache&media=dbmail22-er-model-transparent.png.
Thanks in advance.
Peter
___
DBmail mailing lis
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Mon, Nov 5, 2007, Jorge Bastos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I need to setup a mailling list, how can I do that? Is this supported?
I put this on the wiki two years ago:
http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=mailman
However, I remember seeing a much b
Josh Marshall wrote:
Hi,
I tested with imapsync and found that it caused duplicates. The reason
being that DBMail puts the message id in the header - then the emails
don't match and next time you sync it copies across again.
Read the man page - there are clear instructions on how to ignore
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Josh Marshall wrote:
Hi,
I tested with imapsync and found that it caused duplicates. The reason
being that DBMail puts the message id in the header - then the emails
don't match and next time you sync it copies across again.
Dbmail doesn't do that anymore.
Still it is
Jorge Bastos wrote:
I had this, maybe it's my post you're talking about.
There was one situation that is, the message exists in outlook express, but
sinse it has a crazy date, it appears at the first.
Can you do a search by the subject of that message to really confirm it?
This is the Inbox o
I am almost 100% sure there was a report like this about half a year ago, but
I can not find it to see what is the resolution. Thus the likely duplicate
question - what might be causing the behavior described in the subject?
Running 2.2.7.
Thanks
Peter
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Dec 9 18:34:01 lira dbmail/imap4d[4206]: Debug:[db]
dbmodule.c,db_load_driver(+53): no value for library_directory, using
default [/usr/lib/dbmail]
RTFManpage dbmail.conf(5)
library_directory=/usr/lib/dbmail # directory for locating libraries
is where I see "UTF8" on my systems.
Peter
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 01:22 +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I still see UTF8 errors in the postgresql log. DB is created as UTF8,
> everything should run as UTF8. What should I do?
>
> Dec 20 00:26:08 postgres[10885]: [2-1] idle:F
What about setting up some sort of SQL mirror? Or replication? In
other words, sync via the back-end.
Peter
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 01:38 +0100, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 Dave Logan wrote:
> > Michael, I'm not sure how much bandwidth it's
Hrm. Well, ok then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8
...reading...
Peter
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 13:35 +, Jorge Bastos wrote:
> UTF8 is unicode
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Peter Smith
> Sent
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Michael Monnerie wrote:
I make an imapsync to my mailserver, which connects to the PostgreSQL
db, and I get these numbers:
mailsrv -> db 15.482.309
db -> mailsrv 648.119.851
client -> mailsrv 1.771.458
mailsrv -> client 15.956.176
So with ~18MB IMAP traffic I produce ~
James Cloos wrote:
"Jani" == Jani Partanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jani> Every time when you hash something what is bigger than your
Jani> returned hash, there can be collision.
You still talking about one chance in on the order of 1.
Is this what you will tell to th
Simon Lange wrote:
I started getting the same errors that Simon describes right after upgrading
to 2.9. Worst part is that this error actually has some very nasty
consequences. Please look at bug #685.
Thanks
Peter
___
DBmail mailing list
John Fawcett wrote:
I think that it would be a good idea to add a guard to dbmail to remove
existing Return-Path headers so that this problem does not occur.
E probably not add anything if a duplicate is detected. I definitely do
not want my headers tampered with unless necessary.
In th
John Fawcett wrote:
There should only be one Return-Path header and that should be written
by the final delivery agent, so there isn't much alternative here.
Return-Path headers should only be used for final delivery,
so should not be added to forwarded messages. However MTAs should
remove exi
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo