ly to macs'
resource management structure.
Of course I will advise the list on any dbmail related code that I come up with.
We're working hard to bring macs to beta this month, and this integration will
come soon after.
Cheers,
Blake
Aaron Stone wrote:
Here's another idea th
Please do post diffs/patches!
Boyan Alexiev wrote:
...
Just let me know and I will post the code right away.
Best regards,
Bobby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The simplest method is to do this as root:
echo '|preline -f /path/to/dbmail-smtp -d $RECIPIENT' > ~alias/.qmail-default
Now all mail is set to dbmail by default.
Jaime Chereau wrote:
...
But my question is, what are you doing to tell a qmail to hand off messages
to dbmail-smtp, what command
ld do it, but again I would like to stress that this code has NEVER
BEEN TESTED, and if you use it in a production system it, is likely to error out
at an inopportune time and cause you to LOSE EMAIL.
Hope this helps,
Blake
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!!
I need install smtp-auth or p
t seems
like a good idea to me, please tell me why it is a bad idea.
Blake
Jesse Norell wrote:
Hello,
Ok, here's that autoconf update + md5 password patch + pbsp
and unique_id fixes for using multiple dbmail servers. I've
...
I looked at the fact sheet for powermail, it looks interesting, but it
is missing what I think is the heart of dbmail; the IMAP server. I bet
it would only take a few tweaks to get dbmail-imapd to read messages
from files. I've got this sneaking suspicion it will be faster that way.
Of course,
Yeah, I dislike current IMAP servers exactly for the reasons you list
here. I think one file per message is the only reasonable mode of
operation. It would be best to tune the message store file system for
small inode size, and avoid the problem of large directories by storing
the messages in a
Oh man, I think I'm going to be sick!
Curtis Maurand wrote:
Sounds like an Exchange Server. :-)
Curtis
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Blake wrote:
...
Yes you're right, it was a completely personal flight of fancy, that
wouldn't apply to the general community. It would tear out some of the
great practicality of dbmail. You guys have convinced me that it's not
something I want to do right now anyway.
I'm going to start with creating a headers
ND: [1 authenticate login]
Mar 20 00:15:09 fork dbmail/imap4d[10485]: IMAPD [PID 10485]: user (id
1, name blake) login accepted @ 2003-03-20 00:15:09^M
Mar 20 00:15:10 fork dbmail/imap4d[10485]: COMMAND: [2 select "dbmail"]
Mar 20 00:15:10 fork dbmail/imap4d[10485]: COMMAND: [3 UID
lou wrote:
Where can i find the patch? Thanks
It was posted to the list on the seventh of this month under the subject:
Re: [Dbmail] autoconf update [PATCH]
It has already been merged into cvs IIRC.
Does it acts differently without stunnel?
stunnel is to provide an SSL/TLS wrapper for T
If you only use heap tables, you are just putting your messages into
RAM, the are never written to the hard drive! Are you keeping a copy of
the messages elsewhere just in case the machine or database
dies/restarts? In addition, heap tables prior to MySQL 4.1 have indexing
deficiencies, which c
It should be -lmysqlclient not -libmysqlclient.
Looks like it wants libz as well, try adding a -lz to the link line.
You need to locate mysql/mysql.h on your system, perhaps in
/usr/local/mysql/include? Then add a "-I/path/to/mysql/include/dir" to your
compile line.
James Cook wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/dbmail# make
cc -Wall -O2 -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_SVID_SOURCE main.c -o dbmail-smtp
list.o debug.o pipe
I'm no SQL expert, but isn't that what database sequences are for?
Philip Warner wrote:
At 18:05 6/08/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
Looking at the code in pipe.c, it uses the current time to build the ID;
several messages were received within a second of each other - hence the
non-unique I
After reading the kind of internal changes required to make this work,
one thing does come to mind. It sounds like public folders would solve
this problem. And I bet it would take a lot less core changes to dbmail.
It wouldn't be as transparent for the users, but perhaps that's a good
thing, le
until exit from function free,
which has no line number information.
It's been hanging here ever since, not sure what that means, but now
it's gdb that's chewing CPU.
Blake
I've noticed that in several places, there are redundant indexes created
on the same column. For example, in sql/mysql/create_tables_innoDB.mysql
you have this:
CREATE TABLE tmpmessage (
PRIMARY KEY (message_idnr),
KEY message_idnr (message_idnr),
UNIQUE message_idnr_2 (mess
at http://www.stunnel.org all about stunnel. I used
http://www.junkcert.com to generate the certs I used.
Cheers,
Blake
Richard Houston wrote:
...
Can I add imaps and pop2s to the wish list and I strongly support the
documentation line item as well.
Thanks
Rich
Well then, problem solved!
For my situation, I do not want to allow unsecure connections, so the
separate port is the ideal solution. But for your situation stunnel
3.22, which is what I'm using, has native support for pop3 STLS
negotiations.
-n proto
Negotiate SSL with specif
In case anyone's worried about what's in the zip file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ unzip zftank.zip
Archive: zftank.zip
inflating: zftank/setmap.exe
creating: zftank/maps/
inflating: zftank/maps/1.zmp
inflating: zftank/maps/2.zmp
inflating: zftank/maps/3.zmp
inflating:
Problem 1: I think this is normal behavior, but I could be wrong.
Problem 2: Try some of these: http://www.google.com/search?q=dbmail+sieve
An option could be added to dbmail-maintenance to fix any uppercase aliases.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ilja Booij
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 6:58 AM
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] CAP domain results in "no such user"
There is already a dbmail-dev@dbmail.org list, it is a bit more active
than the general list.
Will Berry wrote:
The subject sort of says it all, but has there been any desire to fork
the mailing list into separate lists for announcements (new releases,
betas, patches), user issues, and deve
I would very much like to set up weDBmail for dbmail 2. I'm sure I'm not
the one.
Chingson Chen wrote:
weDBmail is the fastest web mail system, because it uses
apache+php+mysql directly, without pop3 or imap overhead.
Contact me if you need the weDBmail for dbmail 2.0
[dbmail 2.0 is faster bu
I've been running dbmail 2.x rc/cvs (Postfix 2 MTA) as my sole mail
repository for some months now. I have a few gigs of mail stored, but
only a handful of users. I had a few delivery chain issues about a month
ago that required me to go into the database and fix some mail, but I
haven't lost a
This is frustrating.. On SuSE 9.1, I had to do much recompiling and write a
new RPM to get dbmail installed. Actually, Postfix with MySQL support was
the trick, it doesn't seem to be available as a package for SuSE 9.x.
But all is installed; MySQL is up, dbmail-adduser works. Postfix is
runn
This is completely a Postfix issue, dbmail doesn't run an SMTP server.
Check you mail log for postfix/smtpd errors.
Rick Blake wrote:
This is frustrating…. On SuSE 9.1, I had to do much recompiling and
write a new RPM to get dbmail installed. Actually, Postfix with MySQL
support wa
I did. My note included that info:
Postfix claims Daemon started. Start again says Postfix is already running
No errors in /var/log/mail - shows message 'postfix/master[3033]: daemon
started -- version 2.0.19-20040312'
No errors in /var/log/messages. In fact, nothing is logging except for our
D
No errors. Of course, no response either. Nothing happening... I'm looking
into xinetd for a moment.
Alas... Let me go find a Postfix forum and read up.
Rick
Yeah.. NAV 2004 installed. It has no more e-mail settings, but trying it
disabled yields no difference...
Just so we don't go too far down this road, this Windows machine accesses
several other mail servers just fine, including a Sendmail machine. It
probably isn't Outlook. Oh, it's Outlook 200
I ran pine locally and sent mail as root to a dbmail user.
Postfix blew up beautifully, with exit signals and transport errors galore.
Off to Postfix i go...
rick
I recently got a gmail account, and I wanted to copy a bunch of my old
mail to it from dbmail to try it out. So I wrote this script to copy it
over for me. I figured someone else may be able to use it for one thing
or another, so have at.
Blake
#!/usr/bin/perl
#
# Send mail from a dbmail
Sumbry][ wrote:
We don't bother encrypting the passwords at all.. Granted our db is on a
non routable subnet, but we are talking pop and imap after all which
transmit the passwords in cleartext over the net anyways, so what's the
point? That said, anyone wrapping ssl over imap/pop or anything l
I believe that problem in dbmail-users has been fixed in CVS 2.0 branch,
perhaps a new release candidate is in order?
Kirti S. Bajwa wrote:
Jason:
If you do:
dbmail-adduser a username password 0 20M [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should create an entry in your 'users' table as well as one entry in
In order to upgrade from 2.0 rc to 2.0.0, all I had to do was rename my
tables to add the 'dbmail_' prefix and add the 'is_header' column to the
messageblks table.
David Young wrote:
Hi, I had asked this before but received no reply. Is it possible
to to migrate the earlier 2.0 release candi
on my redhat 7.3 system I have:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dbmail-2.0.0]$ cat /usr/lib/sasl/smtpd.conf
pwcheck_method:PAM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dbmail-2.0.0]$
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dbmail-2.0.0]$ cat /etc/pam.d/smtp
#%PAM-1.0
auth required /lib/security/pam_mysql.so user=root db=dbmail
table=dbmail_us
RT (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/) is a great perl based ticketing
system that has full mail integration.
Simon Buchanan wrote:
Hi there, We are starting to look into building a support ticketing
system. Currently using postfix/dbmail for our mail servers, and
PHP/MySQL for the web servers
ocl wrote:
...
-- Single copy. Again, our people simply thrive on sending CC/BCC stuff
to 10 dozen people for every single mail. Again, without Cyrus,
we'd all be working for disk manufacturers.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this the purpose of the physmessage
table, so the sa
One good dbmail related fix may be to have dbmail-smtp/lmtp respect the
Errors-to header set by mailman, and send the bounce messages there.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Ah, sorry Ilja, you're quite correct.
But it's a dbmail bug nonetheless: dbmail@dbmail.org sends a message to
a user, who bounces
If you never run dbmail-util -p, messages will never be deleted from the
database no matter what the user does.
dbmail does not currently support IMAP server side search (although it
is definitely in the works), but you can of course use a database query
to search your messages.
Dirk H. Schu
I've used Config::IniFiles on several occasions, and never had a
problem. Not that it's a very complicated task.
Jesse Norell wrote:
Hello,
I'm wanting to parse dbmail's config file in perl and wondered
if anyone had any positive/negative experience using any of the
many perl Ini config pars
IMAP can/does insert messages into the database as well, which may cause
problems with a multi-master setup like you describe.
The IMAP APPEND command will insert new messages. For example, my mail
client will put messages into my "Sent" folder on the IMAP server once
I've sent them.
---
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 08:31:30 -0800
From: Angus Jordan <[EMAIL PRO
Likely you need the pgsql development package.
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi there..
Trying to get my first DbMail with Postgres working... have it running
on several MySQL's no problem... I'm not a PG expert by any means so
thought the challenge of learning more about PG would be perfect match
to
If it's not too much trouble, could you please not reply to an existing
message when asking a new question. This keeps the message threading
clear, with one topic per thread.
As to disabling accounts, do you wish to block user access, or disable
mail delivery, or both? For the former I use the
bmail-util stuff), what does this entail?
Thanks,
Blake
This may be of use: http://mailsync.sourceforge.net/
Simon Buchanan wrote:
Hi There,
Does someone have a good emaple/way to move IMAP users between hosts? I
would like to move a couple of users onto my test box as they recieve a
LOT of spam and have consented to be 'testies'... They both have
Jools Enticknap wrote:
Hi All,
I've just completed an installation of dbmail on Suse linux 9.2.
I have now got everything working and I'm very impressed.
All the clients are using Mozilla thunderbird on both Linux and M$, and
the setup has been very easy.
Many thanks to all the the developer
/usr/sbin/stunnel -p /usr/share/ssl/certs/imapd.pem -d imaps -r imap
That's about all there is to it.
RYAN vAN GINNEKEN wrote:
Server Specifics
FreeBSD version 4.10 stable
dbmail-mysql-2.0.0_2
postfix-2.1.5_1,1
procmail-3.22_5 with TLS
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.2_1
clamav-0.82_1
clamsmtp-1.2
I
In a word, no.
Md Mooktakim Ahmed wrote:
I need to know if the support for sieve complete or not, either in cvs or
development. I
just need to know before i make my decision if i really want to use dbmail full
time.
Sieve filtering is one of the main reason why i'm considering dbmail.
Thank y
It's a simple matter of having enough information to figure out who a
person is. If you have identical user names for different domains, and
they are different people, then you need some other piece of identifying
information to figure out the domain. Be it a separate port or IP, or a
domain in
Or you could create a "master" alias. This is the approach I have taken.
Now all my aliases for my various email addresses all point to another
alias, which I can then send to as many different things as I want.
Matt Salerno wrote:
If I want all mail for a specific user to be forwarded to a di
Sounds like your dbmail.conf may be out of date. Try using the one
provided with the new version of dbmail, changed to match your settings
of course.
Jim Douglas wrote:
I tried upgrading as follows,
Stopped Postfix(which was running with dbmail),
cd /root/download/dbmail-2.2.1
autoreconf -i
This has been discussed at length several times in the past. MTAs are
deceptively complicated systems, and there are many good ones already
available. It may be worthwhile however, to package up an existing MTA
such as Sendmail or Postfix so that it installs pre-configured to work
with dbmail.
It is completely a syslog question, edit your /etc/syslog.conf to direct
log messages to the appropriate files.
Simon wrote:
Hi There,
DBMail 2.0.7 on debian sarge. DBMail logs to both the /var/log/mail.log
and the /var/log/syslog. Is there a way to stop it logging to
var/log/syslog? Im gues
I switched to postfix from qmail when I moved to dbmail because of how
well postfix can integrate with a database. There are other MTAs that
work with databases as well of course, but personally I haven't found a
reason to leave postfix yet.
Jamie Doherty wrote:
...
On a side note, I am using
There are patches for stunnel to support STARTTLS, for example:
http://www.stunnel.org/patches/desc/many_sgifford.html
Robert Claeson wrote:
On 9 maj 2006, at 18.06, Kneschke.Lars wrote:
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I don't see any reference to secure imap/pop on the wiki featur
Ron Peterson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 03:58:16PM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 06:06:09PM +0200, Kneschke.Lars wrote:
Ron Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
I don't see any reference to secure imap/pop on the wiki features
request page. As far as I can tell, ther
problem simply by forwarding the original message as an attachment,
instead of inline. This way the end recipient can just reply to the
attached message, all headers intact.
Nataraj S Narayan wrote:
Hi Blake
Pardon me for this personal mail. I use Dbmail 2.0.8. I dont know the
innards of
I have been using the 2.1 subversion trunk branch for about a week now,
and find it just as stable as 2.0.* and faster. Not to mention the added
features. Also, you can go back. The database schema is backwards
compatible with the 2.0.* versions.
DK wrote:
I am running dbmail stable version a
I had this same problem with dump/restore, the solution is, this:
$ mysql -u dbmail -p dbmail
mysql> set FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0;
mysql> \. /path/to/dbmail_dump.sql
this way mysql ignores the foreign key constraints when creating the tables.
DK wrote:
Hi guys;
I am trying to import my dbmail mys
I've been using Horde/IMP and company, nothing fancy, but it works well.
I don not, but some other users on my server use the Ingo rules editor,
and it seems to work well with dbmail-timsieved.
Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
Just curious to do an informal survey on the list.
What open source Web
try
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
begin:vcard
fn:Blake Mitchell
n:Mitchell;Blake
org:Market Metrix
adr;dom:Suite 301;;
run: autoreconf -fi
Jim Douglas wrote:
From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist
To: DBMail mailinglist ,DBMAIL Developers
Mailinglist
Subject: [Dbmail] dbmail branched for 2.2 release
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:50:24 +0200
Hi all,
I've branched the SVN tree and
To help diagnose this problem, it would be helpful to see the relevant
rows from dbmail_aliases, a level 5 trace of dbmail-smtp/lmtp delivery
to the offending recipient, and the SVN revision number of your build.
VladK wrote:
Hi ALL.
Is there anyone who has working multiple forwards ?
Even so
That would be the incorrect behavior if you ask me. I wouldn't want to
send vacation responses to message I was BCCed on. BCC is usually used
for large distribution emails, or to include people who are not the
primary recipients. Either way, a vacation reply is not appropriate.
Aleksander wrot
Paul J Stevens wrote:
...
is to make it more UTF-8 oriented.
There are more candidates for conversion to BYTEA:
dbmail_headervalues.headervalue
dbmail_subjectfield.subjectfield
dbmail_users.userid
dbmail_users.passwd
dbmail_mailboxes.name
come to mind. Did I miss any?
Would aliases be a can
Wow, actual FUD about dbmail. I guess people are starting to take more
interest.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
It may be worth looking at something like APR (http://apr.apache.org/)
for dealing with things like threads and shared memory on disparate
platforms. No doubt this would bloat dbmail somewhat, but it's always
nice to not have to do it all yourself, as we've seen with gmime.
Paul J Stevens wrot
A brief scan of RFC822 (A.3.1.) suggests that Date, From, and To or Bcc
headers are required. Perhaps since you are injecting a message with no
headers at all (or a single header of "s" depending on how you interpret
it) that is what is causing the confusion?
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi,
Paul/Aaro
It always seemed to me that the dbmail_aliases table should have a
user_idnr column along with the deliver_to column. This way if
deliver_to was null, go to the user's inbox. This would allow
constraints to prevent dangling aliases on user delete, and aliases to
user_idnrs that don't exist.
I
I've seen this behavior off and on for as long as I've been on the
dbmail lists (some years now). Occasionally I'll even get replies to my
messages before I get my posts. Never really been a big deal, but I can
certainly confirm.
Michael Monnerie wrote:
I don't know if you know it, but there a
It appears the delivery issue you mentioned is addressed in 3.8.0...
$Id: CHANGELOG,v 1.462 2007/03/18 17:08:49 jonz Exp $
Version 3.8.0
-
[20061210.1435] jonz: fixed message corruption problems with direct delivery
when using direct delivery (e.g. DeliveryHost), certain servers r
If you're not willing to set an alias to each recipient, then you're not
going to get what you want from DBmail. That is how it handles delivey
lists.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
It seems there is a lot of differing opinion about logging, what should
be included, storage format, etc. So perhaps the way to go is abstract
out the logging, like the database layer has been. This way custom
loadable logging modules could be created by folks with custom logging
requirements.
77 matches
Mail list logo
