[Dbmail] comprehensive md5 password patch

2003-03-01 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, Attached is a patch to handle md5 passwords in a nice fashion. It supports md5 hashes and digests for mysql and postgres, including dbmail-adduser support for them, and even updates the man page. :) A couple other fixes are in there, but not the patch from yesterday for big endian Linux

Re: [Dbmail] PATCH: dbmail_configure_check_os.patch

2003-03-01 Thread Aaron Stone
Magnus has an important point: don't check for an OS, check for what its behavior is. I believe that in this case, we're talking about activating parts of a system-dependent header with this flag. That the flag is system dependent is not at issue; it's how we test that. If the approach is like thi

Re: [Dbmail] dbmail-smtp Death by signal 11

2003-03-01 Thread
Hi Bobby, Could you sent me the e-mail message (full source, you can do that with the postcat command) that resulted in the sigsegv? Best regards, Eelco On vrijdag, feb 21, 2003, at 22:14 Europe/Amsterdam, Boyan Alexiev wrote: Hello again guys! It seems I am having some problems with 1

Re: [Dbmail] PATCH: dbmail_configure_check_os.patch

2003-03-01 Thread Jesse Norell
Hello, Yes, I agree that's a better thing to do, and I completely missed that point in Magnus's email (my apologies). And defining __LINUX__ seems like the wrong thing to do if what you want to test is if you need to #include , that's just how md5.c handles it now. That can be changed to a smal

Re: [Dbmail] comprehensive md5 password patch

2003-03-01 Thread Aaron Stone
This sounds really great, but I'd like to pick a bone with the arguments... I think we're now way past due on adding a distinct crypt-type argument to complement the password argument. In particular, the current syntax doesn't make it totally obvious that one cannot do this: dbmail-adduser -5 pas

[Dbmail] webmail for dbmail

2003-03-01 Thread armin langhofer
hi i'm currently working on a webmail interface in jawmail style for dbmail (without imap). i know that there still exists one - i write the second. i figured out that every message has 2 record sets in "messages". one is for the header, the other one is the message itself. but how can i teac

Re: [Dbmail] webmail for dbmail

2003-03-01 Thread
Hi Armin, One thing is for sure, the first messageblk of a message is _always_ the header. Large messages can consist of multiple blocks. DBmail does a query for all messageblks that belong to a message ordered by messageblk_idnr. Consequently the first block is always the header. Best regar

[Dbmail] Patch management

2003-03-01 Thread
Hi All, I've seen a lot of patches lately, thanks a lot for this. Please keep in mind though that we can only submit patches that are for both the postgresql and mysql drivers. Since these are the most used we want them to keep in sync. So if you change stuff in dbmysql.c, you should also cha

[Dbmail] Maximun size of a DB

2003-03-01 Thread Nataniel Klug
Hello, I am just new to DBMail and I want to know how bigger can get a DBMail MySQL database. I am about to create more than 200 mail accounts every with 10 Mbytes. It could get my mail server slow? I have a Pentium III 1.13 Ghz with 512 MB RAM and an Maxtor 7.200 RPM harddrive with 40 Gbytes usin

Re: [Dbmail] webmail for dbmail

2003-03-01 Thread Cedric Veilleux
Hi, On a side note, isn't it a little bit asking for troubles to make a mail client accessing the database directly? Why not use the IMAP interface, any existing webmail that supports imap will work. The IMAP specs are unlikely to change, we can't say this for dbmail's sql layout..