A message is marked for deletion immediatly but is not removed from the
database until the dbmail-maintenance routine is run.
I've run concurrent session before. Unless a newer release has changed
things, POP and IMAP both are capable of running concurrent user sessions.
(with the same user)
Still getting apparent repeated failed suicides; any suggestions of ways to
track this down would be helpful. Looking at the code, I'd guess that the
child process is not finding itself in the list of processes, so is never
getting to the 'exit(0)' statement, but I'd appreaite a comment from
so
imap is obliged by rfc to allow simulatneous sessions; for pop we thought of
it as a feature :-) A lock for pop to prevent simultaneous sessions could be
implemented; any known list of pro/contra arguments?
- Original Message -
From: "Micah Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday
Think that is the case however this would indicate a more serious bug as
it's pid-entry isn't supposed to be cleared except on child exit. Try
placing a exit(0) (and a trace(_ERROR) message) just after the for loop and
see what happens..
regards roel
- Original Message -
From: "Philip War
Definitely AGAINST provided it doesn't cause problems... Can't see any to
date. Doesn't seem to screw up the second session, so all good!
Pop locks cause so many hassles for our helpdesk when people get cut off mid
session or the like. Yay for not needing to worry about it with dbmail!
/Mark
Squirrelmail is REALLY slow lately on my system. When I first installed it,
it worked fine, which was about a month ago. Now it takes minutes to log
in, and authenticate, get the mailbox list, etc. As of today, it fails
completely. For example:
Sep 25 00:57:45 raincross-tech dbmail/imap4[1875
Hello Jeff
Well it does not work when I send from a users account to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] it does not send it to my otherdomain
Thanks
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/23/02 17:24 PM >>>
Hello Abdulla,
AD> anyway this is what i see in the database after all that
AD> 21 postmaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21 0
My experience with the pop daemon is that it *never* commits suicide unless
the POP3D_CHILD_MAX_CONNECTS variable is set to its default as defined in
pop3.h, i.e. 1500 (which is not the same as the default value as set in the
default dbmail.conf). Before I changed it to 1500 the number of open f
Hi guys
Well I don't have this kind of problem , how many users log onto the
server similtaneously? , What is th e spec of the machine , is there
enough cpu , memory power to drive this.
I have a similar problem using fetchmail , tells me thrown from MDA
Can't help you here bru
>>> [EMAIL PROTE
Hello Abdulla,
D> Well it does not work when I send from a users account to
D> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it does not send it to my otherdomain
Does the mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] arrive at the machine to
begin with? If both [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
exist as aliases in the dbmail.users tabl
Can u compile a e-mail stating exactly what you did to make it work
please man , I had to get this thing working a weak ago please :-(
oh , tell me you use fetchmail to download your messages from the isp?
Last q what anti-virus software are there for Linux
Thanks a million man
>>> [EMAIL PROT
Oh and jeff have you got msn account or a icq account?
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/25/02 15:20 PM >>>
Hello Abdulla,
D> Well it does not work when I send from a users account to
D> [EMAIL PROTECTED] it does not send it to my otherdomain
Does the mail for [EMAIL PROTECTED] arrive at the machine to
b
Hello Abdulla,
D> Oh and jeff have you got msn account or a icq account?
Sorry, won't touch either one.
Try this link; it's the last message I posted summarizing how I got
virtual domains and such working with Postfix+dbmail:
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/pipermail/dbmail/2002-June/000707.html
Thi
Leaving some file descriptors open was a bug in RC3 and has been fixed a
long time ago. Which makes me wonder how many of you use the latest cvs and
how many rc3. There have been some bugfixes for all and major speed
improvements for imap since rc3; in my opinion latest cvs is a better
release cand
Hello Roel,
RR> Which makes me wonder how many of you use the latest cvs and how
RR> many rc3. There have been some bugfixes for all and major speed
RR> improvements for imap since rc3; in my opinion latest cvs is a
RR> better release candidate than rc3 :-)
Personally, we froze dbmail prior to rc
I was just getting ready to type a similar email.
We froze Dbmail on the Feb CVS version of Dbmail. We attempted to
upgrade but ran into a number of problems. Also, the table structure had
changed which caused some problems with existing mail accounts.
IMAP is slow for us but only the administra
Is there a clear overview of the changes in the table structure? Would it be
possible to have a general way to convert all the older formats to the
latest? I really would dislike people using some old CVS when the dbmail 1.0
will be released :-( There have been numerous changes to the pop3d
daemon
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 11:35 am, Roel Rozendaal wrote:
> Leaving some file descriptors open was a bug in RC3 and has been fixed a
> long time ago. Which makes me wonder how many of you use the latest cvs and
> how many rc3. There have been some bugfixes for all and major speed
> improvement
Hello Roel,
When 1.0 is released, we will likely update to it rather quickly.
Rearranging database tables is not a big deal for us - we maintain
enough of them. B-)
We're at a point that is beyond the SEGFAULT issue, although I think
that was a BSD-specific issue. March 28 was the last CVS update
19 matches
Mail list logo
