On Monday 05 August 2002 04:32 pm, Dave Logan wrote:
> I think that what Bret is saying (from a technical aspect)
> is that the quotacheck shouldn't count messages with a status
> of "002" because this means they're deleted.
> I agree, but I thought this had been fixed already
> davel
I am run
We have about 600 users and for some reason, some of them (less than 10)
have certain messages that are continuously sent to them via POP (never
deleted). Looking at the database for one such offending message:
message_idnr | 3634
mailbox_idnr | 1157
messagesize | 6010
seen_flag | 0
ans
PW> As far as I can tell from the logs, they are only using POP.
PW> I'd be interested to know if anyone else has these problems, or has any
PW> insight into likely causes.
Certain clients (Outlook is a good example) do not delete messages
until ALL messages are received, so an error with a late
Further investigations of my undead-pop-message problem has revealed
somthing that confuses me: the unique_id field in the messages table is not
unique.
Should they be?
Philip Warner| __---_
Albatross
At 18:05 6/08/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
Further investigations of my undead-pop-message problem has revealed
somthing that confuses me: the unique_id field in the messages table is
not unique.
Should they be?
Looking at the code in pipe.c, it uses the current time to build the ID;
I'm no SQL expert, but isn't that what database sequences are for?
Philip Warner wrote:
At 18:05 6/08/2002 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:
Looking at the code in pipe.c, it uses the current time to build the ID;
several messages were received within a second of each other - hence the
non-unique I
yes they should, what version are you running?
In RC3 it can (however, in very seldom cases) happen that the unique_id
is not unique.
Best regards,
Eelco
Philip Warner heeft op dinsdag, 6 aug 2002 om 10:05 (Europe/Amsterdam)
het volgende geschreven:
Further investigations of my undead-po
At 01:36 6/08/2002 -0700, Blake wrote:
I'm no SQL expert, but isn't that what database sequences are for?
Yes, but the code in pipe.c is at a lower level - I think. One solution
would be to use the DB to allocate a number (eg. db_get_unique_id).
Or, depending on how pipe.c is used (eg. as lo
No, it is not possible to use a sequence. The unique id field should
have a fixed size.
But i'm sure Roel fixed this about 2 months ago.. it's weird that the
pipe.c in CVS seems not being fixed.
I'll look into it.
Best regards,
Eelco
Philip Warner heeft op dinsdag, 6 aug 2002 om 10:56 (Eur
At 11:02 6/08/2002 +0200, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
No, it is not possible to use a sequence. The unique id field should have
a fixed size.
But i'm sure Roel fixed this about 2 months ago.. it's weird that the
pipe.c in CVS seems not being fixed.
I'll look into it.
Thanks!
Do you think
I am also seeing this behavour. I am running the CVS from August 15th, 2002.
The only solution that I have found is to remove the user then add them back
right away.
I think the non-unique ids are coming from the uni-one-convertor. All the
users that I have seen it on, thier mail was from
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 04:02 am, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
> No, it is not possible to use a sequence. The unique id field should
> have a fixed size.
>
> But i'm sure Roel fixed this about 2 months ago.. it's weird that the
> pipe.c in CVS seems not being fixed.
>
> I'll look into it.
>
> Be
At 08:16 6/08/2002 -0500, Bret Baptist wrote:
I am also seeing this behavour. I am running the CVS from August 15th,
2002.
The only solution that I have found is to remove the user then add them back
right away.
You are correct; the conversion was done using the uni-one-converter, and
as far
At 08:19 6/08/2002 -0500, Bret Baptist wrote:
On Tuesday 06 August 2002 04:02 am, Eelco van Beek - IC&S wrote:
> No, it is not possible to use a sequence. The unique id field should
> have a fixed size.
>
> But i'm sure Roel fixed this about 2 months ago.. it's weird that the
> pipe.c in CVS seem
I am using IMP as my web-mail MUA and see that the From address is always
bad when displaying the list of mail. When the mail message is opened
everything seems to be fine.
I've included a small pic of the problem. I've set the debug level to 5 and
included the section of syslog for the display
15 matches
Mail list logo
