pop3 proxying
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: "Sandino Araico Sánchez"
Gesendet: 11. November 2014 03:18:24 MEZ
An: DBMail mailinglist , 'Paul J Stevens'
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] Re max_db_connections
On 02/11/14 15:40, Rogerio Pereira wrote:
>
>
>
>
On 02/11/14 15:40, Rogerio Pereira wrote:
>
>
>
> >> If you want to kill your postgres server that is a good idea :-)
>
>
> *My PostreSQL server is not an issue for me, until now.*
>
> *It has 2 Sixcore processors, 16 GB RAM, SAS 15k disks in RAID
> config. Processor usage is fine.*
>> If you want to kill your postgres server that is a good idea :-)
My PostreSQL server is not an issue for me, until now.
It has 2 Sixcore processors, 16 GB RAM, SAS 15k disks in RAID config. Processor usage is fine.
>> Seriously: DBMail has a kick-ass database pooling m
On 30-10-14 14:23, Rogerio Pereira wrote:
Every 2 minutes should not be a problem, if you have a login_timeout=60
or lower.
Just changed login_timeout=30
Normally, if you kill an existing connection (RST) this is detected by
the network layer and the connection is cleaned
Hi Paul,
The problem with "too many opened files" is fixed after the change.
The server has almost 100 imapd simultaneous connections. It may have 400 as soon as I move all accounts from an old email server.
command: lsof -p `pidof dbmail-imapd`
Results:
dbmail-im 18804 dbmail
;5405ddd1.70...@thelounge.net>
<001901cfc6c9$8d800fe0$a8802fa0$@jorge> <5406a8c1.7090...@lordvan.com>
<77fbe1ac-79ea-42d2-8504-342f458c6...@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <77fbe1ac-79ea-42d2-8504-342f458c6...@email.android.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Db
gt;
<001901cfc6c9$8d800fe0$a8802fa0$@jorge> <5406a8c1.7090...@lordvan.com>
<77fbe1ac-79ea-42d2-8504-342f458c6...@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <77fbe1ac-79ea-42d2-8504-342f458c6...@email.android.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
ays, dbmail 3.1.x and gmime 2.6.x
>
>
> Ursprüngliche Nachricht
> Von: Thomas Raschbacher
> Gesendet: 03. September 2014 07:36:01 MESZ
> An: dbmail@dbmail.org
> Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
>
> What gmime and dbmail versions are
The last recent stable ones as always, dbmail 3.1.x and gmime 2.6.x
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Thomas Raschbacher
Gesendet: 03. September 2014 07:36:01 MESZ
An: dbmail@dbmail.org
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
What gmime and dbmail versions are you getting
t: 02. September 2014 18:18:37 MESZ
> An: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
>
> Which spamassassin version?
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
>&
e innocent, any download
message has the same unreadable header
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: Jorge Bastos
Gesendet: 02. September 2014 18:18:37 MESZ
An: 'DBMail mailinglist'
Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
Which spamassassin version?
> -Origi
Which spamassassin version?
> -Original Message-
> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
> Behalf Of Reindl Harald
> Sent: terça-feira, 2 de Setembro de 2014 16:10
> To: Mailing-List dbmail
> Subject: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
>
Hi
who does that bad to spamassassin headers?
gmime or dbmail?
can this be avoided?
normally they are expected to look like the second example
which is a different mail but you know what i mean, that's
what SA generates orginally
X-Spam-Report: * -2.5 CUST_DNSWL_5 RBL: list.dnswl.org (High Trust
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I dropped using GMime for finding the mime boundary in aug 2013
because of some suspicions wrt gmime's thread-safety. This has been
causing some problems since. Calling 3.1.10 clean is kind of
dangerous. 3.1.10 did not support multiline boundaries, an
unbelieveable
i am building and stressing serveral releases 3.1.10 is
the last one not suffering from the problem "--" instead
"-- mime-id" and i have clearly no idea why this started
around June to affect more and more users
BUG - 3.1.13: 7d23183993e0ad81b8b0fc1920ba8e651043669e
BUG - 3.1.12
On 2013-11-07 10:01, Paul J Stevens wrote:
On 06-11-13 15:12, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
Hi.
I was wondering when you were planning to commiting the re-open log
files on SIGHUP to 3.1
(http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=3621ad7566949fc565176a040989eace1c18f295
) -- also is there a way t
On 06-11-13 15:12, Thomas Raschbacher wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I was wondering when you were planning to commiting the re-open log
> files on SIGHUP to 3.1
> (http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=3621ad7566949fc565176a040989eace1c18f295
> ) -- also is there a way to re-read e.g. logging config from
Hi.
I was wondering when you were planning to commiting the re-open log
files on SIGHUP to 3.1
(http://git.dbmail.eu/paul/dbmail/commit/?id=3621ad7566949fc565176a040989eace1c18f295 ) -- also is there a way to re-read e.g. logging config from dbmail.conf yet on SIGHUP? (would be very useful to t
any chance on that ?
Original Message
Subject:[Dbmail] Re: fix_foreign_keys
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:42:08 +0200
From: joan.mor...@m4x.org
Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist
To: dbmail@dbmail.org, p...@nfg.nl
As required
JM
diff --git a/sql/mysql
As required
JM
diff --git a/sql/mysql/fix_foreign_keys.mysql b/sql/mysql/fix_foreign_keys.mysql
index bcb506d..efdb133 100644
--- a/sql/mysql/fix_foreign_keys.mysql
+++ b/sql/mysql/fix_foreign_keys.mysql
@@ -42,8 +42,9 @@ SET FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS=0;
alter table dbmail_mailboxes drop foreign key own
2009 9:31
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> On Donnerstag 15 Januar 2009 Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > How this email from 10-2008 apear here???
>
> From the headers:
> Received: from [213.214.98.20] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>
On Donnerstag 15 Januar 2009 Jorge Bastos wrote:
> How this email from 10-2008 apear here???
From the headers:
Received: from [213.214.98.20] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by elnino.fastxs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA001BF82;
Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:45:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp.d
Wow.
How this email from 10-2008 apear here???
> -Original Message-
> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 17:04
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE:
On Dienstag 06 Januar 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote:
> >> LINE 1: ALTER TABLE dbmail_users ALTER COLUMN passwd VARCHAR(130)
The "type" keyword is just missing:
ALTER TABLE dbmail_users ALTER COLUMN passwd TYPE VARCHAR(130);
> Mmm, I guess that wasn't tested by anyone until now: postgresql
> doesnt s
My BSD wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 11:37:17 -0700
> Jesse Norell wrote:
>
> Hello Jesse and thank you!
>
>>> Tried to update the DB as follows:
>>>
>>> "# psql -U pgsql dbmail < 2_3_4-2_3_5.pgsql"
>>>
>>> With the following result:
>>> ---
First off, there are some 'known issues' with 2.3.5:
- problems with squirrelmail/avelsieve talking to dbmail-timsieved I
can't reproduce myself.
- on my machine thunderbird doesn't like imap/starttls. I havent really
investigated yet, other than produce a thunderbird logtrace.
Jesse Norell wrot
> Tried to update the DB as follows:
>
> "# psql -U pgsql dbmail < 2_3_4-2_3_5.pgsql"
>
> With the following result:
>
> ALTER TABLE
Already in the experimental repository.
Jake Anderson wrote:
> any chance of a deb?
>
> Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> DBMail version 2.3.5, the latest in the 'unstable' development series,
> is now upon us.
>
> The focus of this release has been stability, stability and stability.
> Bu
any chance of a deb?
Paul J Stevens wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
DBMail version 2.3.5, the latest in the 'unstable' development series,
is now upon us.
The focus of this release has been stability, stability and stability.
But dbmail now also has native TLS/SS
>
> Just the final part of the logs will do. No need to do this on the
> list.
>
>
> --
Well after i sent the emails i remembered that I could opened a bug report
and insert the files there.
Tell me when you have news about it
___
DBmail mailing lis
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul, finally it died running on Valgrind!
> See the attach logs, I believe this will help you.
Just the final part of the logs will do. No need to do this on the list.
--
Paul Stevens
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: sábado, 1 de Novembro de 2008 19:59
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Paul, finally it died running on Valgrind!
> Se
gt; Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2008 14:56
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Perfect.
> About the logs, tell me is that help's you, for you to finish this
> lmtpd
> issue, to a
-
From: "Jonathan Feally" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMail mailinglist"
Sent: 10/31/2008 5:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Re: which tables
I thought I suggested that??? If you want all the messages in the old
db, then the auto_increment will be much faster and more reliabl
I thought I suggested that??? If you want all the messages in the old
db, then the auto_increment will be much faster and more reliable. If
you are wanting to filter out some messages such as only transfer mail
that is <1 year old, then imapsync would be a better choice for that. If
you already
Curtis Maurand wrote:
Hello,
the migration is complete. I moved the following tables and everything
worked out just fine. If I need to get the messages back in, I'll load
up dbmail on a test server and use IMAPsync to transfer the messages.
don't use imapsync for that! If you setup the ot
Hello,
the migration is complete. I moved the following tables and everything
worked out just fine. If I need to get the messages back in, I'll load
up dbmail on a test server and use IMAPsync to transfer the messages.
I've got a dump of the original database.
To move structure only, move
e 2008 14:57
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > Paul, see if the attached logs help in anything.
> > I have two question, when running on valgrind, something doesn't work
> as
> > before, wha
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul, see if the attached logs help in anything.
> I have two question, when running on valgrind, something doesn't work as
> before, what's the best setup to run the zdb system under valgrind?
> Is there a option for git to use like I did before with svn, I used:
>
> Svn up
Right,
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
> Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2008 11:45
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Jorge Bastos wrote:
>
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul,
> It seems to be working OK.
> I've done the same as before that was, stop lmtpd, and wait to have A LOT of
> messages in the queue, and start lmtpd, and do a postfix flush, now works
> OK.
> But there's the second thing, imapd, it still failing.
>
> Message from [EMAIL
> > Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at Fri Oct 31 11:11:38 2008 ...
> > lira dbmail/imap4d[11612]: [0x9c94278] EMERGENCY:[db]
> db_con_get(+241):
> > can't get a database connection from the pool! [(nil)]
>
> Jorge, you need to restart imapd. The debug output has changed.
>
>
> --
Going to recon
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul,
> It seems to be working OK.
> I've done the same as before that was, stop lmtpd, and wait to have A LOT of
> messages in the queue, and start lmtpd, and do a postfix flush, now works
> OK.
> But there's the second thing, imapd, it still failing.
>
> Message from [EMAIL
Ops too soon, lmtpd crashed again.
Going to valgrind it
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2008 11:12
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail
lse.
Confirm me
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2008 10:53
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> > Jor
> Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > Ok paul, if you need anything else just say.
>
> Jorge,
>
> I think I fixed this now.
>
> --
Going to update from git and let you know how it behaves.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mai
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Ok paul, if you need anything else just say.
Jorge,
I think I fixed this now.
--
Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl
NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/
Ok paul, if you need anything else just say.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
> Sent: sexta-feira, 31 de Outubro de 2008 9:14
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Got it, i'm new to this git.
>
> Did the lmtpd log helped you in something?
>
Yes, I'll try to look into it later today.
--
Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl
NET FACILITI
Got it, i'm new to this git.
Did the lmtpd log helped you in something?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Stevens
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 17:34
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Ok, thats the right version.
Please update from git.dbmail.eu. It should give me better info about
the database connectionpool size and behaviour.
Sorry my dumbness, i installed "git" package from debian, but I have no
"git" command:
That the Gnu Interactive Tools. You n
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 12:38
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > Paul, attached a valgrind from LMTPD when it stoped working.
> &g
Does the list accept an attach with 3MB?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul J Stevens
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 12:38
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
> Ok, thats the right version.
>
> Please update from git.dbmail.eu. It should give me better info about
> the database connectionpool size and behaviour.
>
Sorry my dumbness, i installed "git" package from debian, but I have no
"git" command:
---
Setting up gnuit (4.9.4-1) ...
Setting up git
James Cloos wrote:
>> "Paul" == Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Paul> As part of this move the Changelog file will no longer be maintained.
> Paul> The official Changlog is now strictly available online.
>
> Over at Xorg we use an entry in the Makefiles which writes git log's
>
Ok, thats the right version.
Please update from git.dbmail.eu. It should give me better info about
the database connectionpool size and behaviour.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
>> What version of libzdb are you using?
>>
>
> lira:~# dpkg -l|grep -i zdb
> ii libzdb-2.2.3-4 2.2.3-1
Jorge Bastos wrote:
>>> Going to set max to 30
>>>
>>> Here it is what happened with 20:
>>>
>>> Oct 30 12:05:33 lira dbmail/imap4d[21014]: [0x897eee0] Alert:[db]
>>> db_con_get(+238): Thread is having trouble obtaining a database
>> connection.
>>> Try [25]
>> Cool. Way to go Jon!
>
>
> Tryed wi
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul, attached a valgrind from LMTPD when it stoped working.
>
> Since I have several messages in the postfix queue, the only thing I had to
> do to make LMTPD die was a postfix flush
Mmm. Please provide a log with
SYSLOG_LOGGING_LEVELS=128 in dbmail.conf
(is the same as t
> "Paul" == Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Paul> As part of this move the Changelog file will no longer be maintained.
Paul> The official Changlog is now strictly available online.
Over at Xorg we use an entry in the Makefiles which writes git log's
output to ChangeLog while creat
I'll add some better diagnostics... about 20 connections should be
plenty except for very busy systems.
Jorge Bastos wrote:
>>> Going to set max to 30
>>>
>>> Here it is what happened with 20:
>>>
>>> Oct 30 12:05:33 lira dbmail/imap4d[21014]: [0x897eee0] Alert:[db]
>>> db_con_get(+238): Thread
To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> > > Going to set max to 30
> > >
> > > Here it is what happened with 20:
> > >
> > > Oct 30 12:05:33 lira dbmail/imap4d[21014]: [0x897eee0] Alert:[db]
> > &
> > Going to set max to 30
> >
> > Here it is what happened with 20:
> >
> > Oct 30 12:05:33 lira dbmail/imap4d[21014]: [0x897eee0] Alert:[db]
> > db_con_get(+238): Thread is having trouble obtaining a database
> connection.
> > Try [25]
>
> Cool. Way to go Jon!
Tryed with 30, and then with 40,
Jorge Bastos wrote:
>>> Defined:
>>> max_db_connections = 20
>> That is the default. If you see the same error as before, increase it
>> to
>> 30. Libzdb will keep the pool as small as possible. This value sets
>> only
>> the maximum.
>
> Going to set max to 30
>
> Here it is what happened with
> > Defined:
> > max_db_connections = 20
>
> That is the default. If you see the same error as before, increase it
> to
> 30. Libzdb will keep the pool as small as possible. This value sets
> only
> the maximum.
Going to set max to 30
Here it is what happened with 20:
Oct 30 12:05:33 lira dbm
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Defined:
> max_db_connections = 20
That is the default. If you see the same error as before, increase it to
30. Libzdb will keep the pool as small as possible. This value sets only
the maximum.
>
> for git, im not familiar with it, but as far I remember from someone askin
ns
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 11:34
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
>
> Jorge,
>
> Please update again. And set max_db_connections in your dbmail.conf
>
> Install GIT on your development server becaus
RDEREDSUBJECT UNSELECT IDLE
>
>
> [SIEVE]
> EFFECTIVE_USER=nobody # Root privs are used to open a port, then privs
> EFFECTIVE_GROUP=nogroup # are dropped down to the user/group specified
> here.
>
> #BINDIP=192.168.1.222
> BINDIP=*
> PORT=2000
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 11:06
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Any ideia how to deb
IL PROTECTED]
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 10:58
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Well Paul,
> There's something for you, in about 10m it happened:
> ---
> Oct 30 10:58:35 lira dbmail/imap4d[252
IL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Outubro de 2008 10:46
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> >
> > I meant: the IDLE problem is now fixed. Please test Outlook with IDLE
> > enabled.
>
> I meant: the IDLE problem is now fixed. Please test Outlook with IDLE
> enabled.
Ops sorry, read it wrong. Ok going to test and let you know.
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Outlook with IDLE disabled seems to work OK too.
> I haven't tested it fully but will do more in the weekend and let you know.
I meant: the IDLE problem is now fixed. Please test Outlook with IDLE
enabled.
--
___
e 2008 10:14
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Jorge Bastos wrote:
> > Paul,
> > Yap, disabled IDLE and wow, it's about 3 times faster with this new
> ZDB
> > system!
> > Fantastic.
> > So it's the
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul,
> Yap, disabled IDLE and wow, it's about 3 times faster with this new ZDB
> system!
> Fantastic.
> So it's the same thing that is bugging thunderbird, happens in outlook 2007
> at least, and probably in other outlook family's.
> Are you working in this IDLE thing?
It wo
essage-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jorge Bastos
> Sent: quarta-feira, 29 de Outubro de 2008 9:12
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> capability = IMAP4 IMAP4rev1 AUTH=L
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Stevens
> Sent: quarta-feira, 29 de Outubro de 2008 7:58
> To: DBMail mailinglist
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> One idea. Try disabling IDLE in dbmail.conf. Thunderbird chokes on it
> at
&g
One idea. Try disabling IDLE in dbmail.conf. Thunderbird chokes on it at
the moment. Perhaps Outlook has the same problem.
Paul Stevens wrote:
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul,
Something's not right.
It takes a lot to do simple things like retrieve a 4kb message, delete
it.
I don't see on the logs
Jorge Bastos wrote:
Paul,
Something's not right.
It takes a lot to do simple things like retrieve a 4kb message, delete it.
I don't see on the logs errors.
Any ideia?
Not without logs.
--
Paul Stevens
eira, 28 de Outubro de 2008 15:11
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> Ok working but,
> The first thing i did was to delete a message from my imap account, and
> it
> hanged.
> Going to try to debug this later tonigh
o de 2008 14:58
> To: 'DBMail mailinglist'
> Subject: RE: [Dbmail] RE: Help on new ZDB system
>
> > >> Failed to start connection pool -- no host specified in URL
> > >
> > >
> > > Just a guess, but have you tried setting host=localhost l
> >> Failed to start connection pool -- no host specified in URL
> >
> >
> > Just a guess, but have you tried setting host=localhost like the
> > comments say to do?
>
> Indeed.
>
> We'll switch to DSN uris in time, but for now plz specify the host.
>
You're the boss!!
__
> Just a guess, but have you tried setting host=localhost like the
> comments say to do?
>
No :P
___
DBmail mailing list
DBmail@dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
Jesse Norell wrote:
>> # Database settings
>> host= # host for database, set to localhost if database is
>> om
>> # the same host as dbmail and you want to use a
>> local socket
>> # for connecting.
>> sqlport=# if yo
> # Database settings
> host= # host for database, set to localhost if database is
> om
> # the same host as dbmail and you want to use a
> local socket
> # for connecting.
> sqlport=# if you want to use TCP/IP for c
Forgot this:
---
# Database settings
host= # host for database, set to localhost if database is
om
# the same host as dbmail and you want to use a
local socket
# for connecting.
sqlport=# if you want to use TCP/IP f
It's a dbmail bug.
If you issue a simple 'x LIST "" *' mailboxes the current user has 'l'
permissions on below #Users will show up nicely. This is what SM does.
However, TB uses 'x LIST "" #Users*' which is currently not allowed by
dbmail. It should be however. TB also tries to fall back to ad
Hi Bert
I also had a similar problem with my users Shared Folders (#User instead
of #Public) and found that it also would not show up in Thunderbird,
Expect this problem seemed to solve itself, after a short period, it
just appeared.
I'm not sure what it was that did it, perhaps I recreated
Hi Simon
I have the same setup here with the same versions of dbmail and
thunderbird and it works for me... It might be something specific to how
you have configured dbmail? Can you provide us with more details of your
setup?
Cheers,
Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Send DBmail mailing list
On Sunday 20 July 2008 20:36:46 Michael Monnerie wrote:
> I received this e-mail to my imapsync-howto page, and forward it to the
> dbmail mailinglist so all can see the communication.
>
> -- Forwarded message from Stef Bon: --
>
> Betreff: Question about imapsync.
> Datum: Donner
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 10:42 -0400, Curtis Maurand wrote:
> I'm
> trying to figure out how to marry all of these databases into
> something
> coherent where I can set up a webgui to manage it all.
You can find a few web-based sieve script editors you can run over the
managesieve protocol, thoug
On Thu, 22 May 2008 at 10:42 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
D Hill wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2008 at 09:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
more like:
if header :contains ["[SPAM]"] {
/* that might have to be ["\[SPAM\]"] */
fileinto "INBOX/Spam",
stop;
}
So '/' and '.' can be us
D Hill wrote:
On Thu, 22 May 2008 at 09:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
more like:
if header :contains ["[SPAM]"] {
/* that might have to be ["\[SPAM\]"] */
fileinto "INBOX/Spam",
stop;
}
So '/' and '.' can be used interchangeably as a folder separator? This
rule, is it assumed so
On Thu, 22 May 2008 at 09:41 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
more like:
if header :contains ["[SPAM]"] {
/* that might have to be ["\[SPAM\]"] */
fileinto "INBOX/Spam",
stop;
}
So '/' and '.' can be used interchangeably as a folder separator? This
rule, is it assumed something is bein
more like:
if header :contains ["[SPAM]"] {
/* that might have to be ["\[SPAM\]"] */
fileinto "INBOX/Spam",
stop;
}
wrote:
On Wed, 21 May 2008 at 17:56 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] confabulated:
OK, it sounds like something I'll be able to make happen once, I've
completed my upgrade to version 2.
On Montag, 19. Mai 2008 Paul J Stevens wrote:
> that sounds a lot like a mysql-101 question.
I think the OP uses phpmyadmin and doesn't understand mysql, and seeks a
way to create the dbmail db using phpmyadmin.
mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc- http://it-management.at
// Te
Percy Thaba wrote:
> Can someone please help me with the setup of DBMail? I tried to follow
> the mysql creation instructions, but i'm having trouble getting past the
> first step.
>
> I currently have 2 databases that i manage using phpMyAdmin. I thought i
> should just add the DBMail MySQL DB wi
Can someone please help me with the setup of DBMail? I
tried to follow the mysql creation instructions, but i'm
having trouble getting past the first step.
I currently have 2 databases that i manage using
phpMyAdmin. I thought i should just add the DBMail MySQL
DB with phpMyAdmin, but I'm hav
Michael Mayer wrote:
> Paul J Stevens wrote:
>>formail -ds dbmail-smtp -u testuser$i -m mailbox$j
>
> Do I have to add those 100 testusers and mailboxes first or will that
> happen automatically for some reason?
users are not created automatically, mailboxes are if you use the pipe
interface
Paul J Stevens wrote:
formail -ds dbmail-smtp -u testuser$i -m mailbox$j
Do I have to add those 100 testusers and mailboxes first or will that
happen automatically for some reason?
As far as I understood the script, it will add each mail to 100
mailboxes shared by 100 users, so it will c
Michael Mayer wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> But if you can empirically demonstrate that over-indexing
>> signifficantly slows down the typical (mostly read) workload of
>> DBMail, I'd be most interested to see it.
>
> I just decided to test it... maybe on the weekend :)
>
> The only questi
1 - 100 of 595 matches
Mail list logo
