Am 21.09.2014 um 11:47 schrieb Paul J Stevens: > It may well be dbmail/gmime doing this. But then, there is nothing in > the rfcs that specifies such proprietary formatting of headers, afaik. > If there is, please let me know, so I can ask Jeff to fix gmime.
that's not a matter of RFC's
that's a matter of usability and modify data
honestly after re-construct a message should appear
binary identical as it came through the MTA - frankly
some headers can be part of a signature checksum
why are received headers not fucked up the same way?
they use the same "proprietary formatting" and the
"References" field looks also fine - so why mangle
"X-Spam-Report"
Received: from dbmail01.icns.fastxs.net (dbmail01.icns.fastxs.net
[213.214.111.4])
by mail-gw.thelounge.net (THELOUNGE GATEWAY) with ESMTP id 3j13pp4Rwnz1l
for <h.rei...@thelounge.net>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:47:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dbmail01.icns.fastxs.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 56324E22D; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:47:07 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dbmail01.icns.fastxs.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 4AB19E20B; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:47:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx3.nfg.nl (mx3.nfg.nl [194.109.214.22])
by dbmail01.icns.fastxs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B36E1AC
for <dbmail@dbmail.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:47:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.nfg.nl (mail2.nfgs.net [194.109.214.20])
by mx3.nfg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5870860171 for <dbmail@dbmail.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 12:10:43
+0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.16.1.42] (nfg1 [83.160.122.30]) (using TLSv1
with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate
requested)
by mail.nfg.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 526B91437C
for <dbmail@dbmail.org>; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:52:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <541e9e97.2030...@nfg.nl>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:47:03 +0200
From: Paul J Stevens <p...@nfg.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/31.0
To: DBMail mailinglist <dbmail@dbmail.org>
References: <5405ddd1.70...@thelounge.net>
<001901cfc6c9$8d800fe0$a8802fa0$@jorge> <5406a8c1.7090...@lordvan.com>
<77fbe1ac-79ea-42d2-8504-342f458c6...@email.android.com>
In-Reply-To: <77fbe1ac-79ea-42d2-8504-342f458c6...@email.android.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
X-BeenThere: dbmail@dbmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist <dbmail@dbmail.org>
List-Id: DBMail mailinglist <dbmail.dbmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/options/dbmail>,
<mailto:dbmail-requ...@dbmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.fastxs.nl/pipermail/dbmail>
List-Post: <mailto:dbmail@dbmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dbmail-requ...@dbmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail>,
<mailto:dbmail-requ...@dbmail.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org
Errors-To: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org
X-Virus-Scanned: Yes
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5, tag-level=4.5, block-level=8.0
X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 CUST_DNSWL_3 RBL: dnswl-aggregate.thelounge.net (Low
Trust) * [213.214.111.4 listed in dnswl-aggregate.thelounge.net] *
0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail *
domains are different * -2.0 USER_IN_MORE_SPAM_TO User is listed in
'more_spam_to' * -2.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% *
[score: 0.0000]
> On 03-09-14 09:25, Reindl Harald (mobile) wrote:
>> The last recent stable ones as always, dbmail 3.1.x and gmime 2.6.x
>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>> Von: Thomas Raschbacher <lord...@lordvan.com>
>> Gesendet: 03. September 2014 07:36:01 MESZ
>> An: dbmail@dbmail.org
>> Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
>>
>> What gmime and dbmail versions are you getting this with?
>>
>> Am 02.09.2014 18:51, schrieb Reindl Harald (mobile):
>>> The current one - but how do that matter - SHA cli tools generate the
>>> proper formatted on the same machine, SA Upstream says there is only one
>>> place of code to generate this and the first response was "fix your mail
>>> client it must be the one reformat the header" thunderbird is for sure
>>> innocent, any download message has the same unreadable header
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --------
>>> Von: Jorge Bastos <mysql.jo...@decimal.pt>
>>> Gesendet: 02. September 2014 18:18:37 MESZ
>>> An: 'DBMail mailinglist' <dbmail@dbmail.org>
>>> Betreff: Re: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
>>>
>>> Which spamassassin version?
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Reindl Harald
>>>> Sent: terça-feira, 2 de Setembro de 2014 16:10
>>>> To: Mailing-List dbmail
>>>> Subject: [Dbmail] re-formatting of headers
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> who does that bad to spamassassin headers?
>>>> gmime or dbmail?
>>>> can this be avoided?
>>>>
>>>> normally they are expected to look like the second example which is a
>>>> different mail but you know what i mean, that's what SA generates
>>>> orginally
>>>>
>>>> X-Spam-Report: * -2.5 CUST_DNSWL_5 RBL: list.dnswl.org (High Trust)
>>>> *
>>>> [168.100.1.7 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -0.0 CUST_DNSWL_1 RBL:
>>>> dnswl-low.thelounge.net (Low Trust) * [168.100.1.7 listed in
>>>> dnswl-low.thelounge.net] * -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good
>>>> reputation (+3)
>>>> * [168.100.1.7 listed in wl.mailspike.net] * 0.0
>>>> HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
>>>> *
>>>> domains are different * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly
>>>> abused
>>>> enduser mail provider * (fernando.souto.maior[at]gmail.com)
>>>> * 0.0
>>>> NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: URI host has a public dotted-decimal IPv4
>>>> *
>>>> address * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 2.0
>>>> BAYES_50
>>>> BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4981]
>>>> * 0.3
>>>> HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10 BODY: Message is 5% to 10% HTML obfuscation
>>>> * -0.5
>>>> DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
>>>> *
>>>> domain * -0.5 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK
>>>> signature * 0.5 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not
>>>> necessarily * valid * -0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike
>>>> good senders *
>>>> 0.0 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN 2nd level domains in From and *
>>>> EnvelopeFrom freemail headers are different
>>>> Return-Path: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
>>>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>>> boundary=089e01493a0c18807d0502166800
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> _______
>>>>
>>>> X-Spam-Report:
>>>> * -2.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
>>>> * 7.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
>>>> * [score: 0.9973]
>>>> * 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature,
>>>> adsp_override is
>>>> * CUSTOM_MED
>>>> * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser
>>>> mail provider
>>>> * (reindl.harald[at]gmail.com)
>>>> * 2.0 DEAR_SOMETHING BODY: Contains 'Dear (something)'
>>>> * 0.6 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
>>>> * 0.0 LOTS_OF_MONEY Huge... sums of money
>>>> * 0.0 T_MONEY_PERCENT X% of a lot of money for you
>>>> * 0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW Appears to be advance fee fraud
>>>> (Nigerian 419)
>>>> * 0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW Appears to be advance fee fraud
>>>> (Nigerian 419)
>>>> * 0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_5_NEW_MONEY Advance Fee fraud and lots of
>>>> money
>>>> * 0.0 ADVANCE_FEE_4_NEW_MONEY Advance Fee fraud and lots of
>>>> money
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
