[Dbmail] (no subject)

2016-06-27 Thread st_goodwin
___ DBmail mailing list DBmail@dbmail.org http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-10-08 Thread Paul J Stevens
It's not a real bug. Just a small regression during work-in-progress. Sjoerd wrote: > Something strange after svn 2778. > I've tested svn 2792 and Squirrelmail doesn't show any messagelist anymore. > It's completely blank. > Tested with Outlook Express on an XP machine and that seems to work ok.

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-10-06 Thread Sjoerd
Something strange after svn 2778. I've tested svn 2792 and Squirrelmail doesn't show any messagelist anymore. It's completely blank. Tested with Outlook Express on an XP machine and that seems to work ok. Reverting to svn 2778 resolves the squirrelmail issue. I don't know if this is a bug in db

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-04-27 Thread Paul J Stevens
>From d10673a9dcfd66414e20bfc678b45408c926034a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 In-Reply-To: <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> References: <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:20:19 +0200 Subject: bail out after too many uncaught socket errors --- dbmail-imapsessio

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-04-27 Thread Paul J Stevens
>From d10673a9dcfd66414e20bfc678b45408c926034a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 In-Reply-To: <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> References: <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:20:19 +0200 Subject: bail out after too many uncaught socket errors --- dbmail-imapsessio

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-02-19 Thread Paul J Stevens
Jim Douglas wrote: > > I noticed in the alias table I had an entry like "@mydomain.com" in > addition to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". > > That all I need to remove from the aliases table to reject, correct? Adding wildcard addresses means a one-up for spammers. Think defense in-depth here. In my experi

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-02-19 Thread Jim Douglas
From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:17:37 +0100 It will allow postfix to reject mail for invalid addresses. Such mail will not even be queued by postfix and will end up

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-02-19 Thread Paul J Stevens
Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist >> To: DBMail mailinglist >> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) >> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:27:23 +0100 >> >> >> Yes Jim, >> >> setting up a local_recipients_map is a *good* thing. >> >> >> Jim Douglas wr

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-02-18 Thread Jim Douglas
From: Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: DBMail mailinglist To: DBMail mailinglist Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:27:23 +0100 Yes Jim, setting up a local_recipients_map is a *good* thing. Jim Douglas wrote: > I am a victim of massive amounts

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-02-18 Thread Paul J Stevens
Yes Jim, setting up a local_recipients_map is a *good* thing. Jim Douglas wrote: > I am a victim of massive amounts or email being rejected(that did not > originate from my server) and sent to a user that does not exist on my > server, which in turn gets forwarded to the admin email address. I

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2007-02-18 Thread Jim Douglas
I am a victim of massive amounts or email being rejected(that did not originate from my server) and sent to a user that does not exist on my server, which in turn gets forwarded to the admin email address. I want to Reject Unknown Local Recipients with Postfix/DBMAIL. This is what's happening

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-12-12 Thread dbmail
On 12-dec-2006, at 11:54, Leander Koornneef wrote: On 12-dec-2006, at 11:35, dbmail wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to install gmime 2.2.2 on my brand new 4.0 system (as an requirement for DBmail 2.2.1) When I try to compile, I get this; if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHA

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-12-12 Thread Leander Koornneef
On 12-dec-2006, at 11:35, dbmail wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to install gmime 2.2.2 on my brand new 4.0 system (as an requirement for DBmail 2.2.1) When I try to compile, I get this; if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H - I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../util

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-12-12 Thread dbmail
Hi all, I'm trying to install gmime 2.2.2 on my brand new 4.0 system (as an requirement for DBmail 2.2.1) When I try to compile, I get this; if /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H - I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../util -DGMIME_VERSION= \"2.2.2\"

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
Pretty easy to use. I've seen the table many times but didn't thinked of it when i wrote this question. Thanks Paul - Original Message - From: "Paul J Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMail mailinglist" Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 2:28

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-08-18 Thread Paul J Stevens
Jorge, You can: 1) prepend the encrypted password with some string, to be removed when you want to re-enable the account. 2) use dbmail_usermaps following README.usermaps, try: INSERT INTO dbmail_usermap (login,sock_deny) VALUES ('clientA','inet:0.0.0.0:0'); which will block network access for

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-08-18 Thread Jorge Bastos
DecimalPeople and Paul, What do you sugest to have the users's accounts enable/disable? for example, it existed a field in the dbmail_users table like "login_allowed" (boolean) it'll be great. What's your opinion? Jorge

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-06-15 Thread Marc Dirix
If you need a simple mailinglist, with no automatic user insertion and stuff, you could always use a sieve script, with the redirect option. I've placed multiple redirect in the script, and that seems to work ok! (Use latest SVN for this!)

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-06-15 Thread Paul J Stevens
e - From: "Paul J Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "DBMail mailinglist" > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) > > >> Jorge Bastos wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> How can i setup a ma

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-06-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
;Paul J Stevens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMail mailinglist" Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7:32 PM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) Jorge Bastos wrote: Hi, How can i setup a mailling list with dbmail? Don't. But if you *must*, use pipe's in the deliver_to fi

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-06-14 Thread Paul J Stevens
Jorge Bastos wrote: > Hi, > > How can i setup a mailling list with dbmail? Don't. But if you *must*, use pipe's in the deliver_to field of dbmail_aliases. dbmail-users -x [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ -t "|/var/lib/mailman/mail/mailman post mylistname" and repeat that for all the required

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-06-14 Thread Jorge Bastos
DecimalHi, How can i setup a mailling list with dbmail? Jorge Bastos

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-05-09 Thread Kneschke.Lars
Robert Claeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >I need to enable services POP3 and/or IMAP on a per-user basis such >that user A can only log in via POP3 while user B can log in via both >POP3 and IMAP. > >I'm currently running 2.0 and plan to upgrade to 2.2 when it's ready >for production use.

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-05-09 Thread Robert Claeson
I need to enable services POP3 and/or IMAP on a per-user basis such that user A can only log in via POP3 while user B can log in via both POP3 and IMAP. I'm currently running 2.0 and plan to upgrade to 2.2 when it's ready for production use. Will it have such functionality, or would I hav

[Dbmail] (no subject) InnoDB startup options

2006-04-03 Thread M. J. [Mike] OBrien
t;Andy Blackshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMail mailinglist" Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 10:13 AM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) The file specified as autextend will grow to the set limit e.g. ibdata1:4000M;ibdata2:1000M:autoextend:max:4000M when you iniitalise you

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-04-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
Cool, I understood now :P Thanks Jorge - Original Message - From: "Andy Blackshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMail mailinglist" Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) The file specified as autextend will grow to the se

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-04-03 Thread Andy Blackshaw
al Message - > From: "Andy Blackshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "DBMail mailinglist" > Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:01 PM > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) > > > > As it stands the config would create 2 ibdata files at startup of ~ > > 1

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-04-03 Thread Jorge Bastos
rom: "Andy Blackshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMail mailinglist" Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 1:01 PM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) As it stands the config would create 2 ibdata files at startup of ~ 1GB, 3GB, and 1GB, the last of these will grow automatically

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-04-03 Thread Andy Blackshaw
As it stands the config would create 2 ibdata files at startup of ~ 1GB, 3GB, and 1GB, the last of these will grow automatically to 4GB before you finally run out of space in innodb. As I said this config evolved, I did not anticipate needing this much space, and haveing filled the first 2 exte

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-03-31 Thread Jorge Bastos
mailinglist" Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:33 AM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) Jorge Bastos wrote: hum, perhaps Paul could upgrade that in the SQL scripts :P Paul, please upgrade that. You mean downgrade? I wont fix that because TYPE=InnoDB is deprecated. ENGINE= has been supporte

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-03-31 Thread Paul J Stevens
frm' >>(errno: 121) >> >>using engine instead of type but nothing >>the most strange is that i can create the table with myisam and later >>convert it to innodb without any error. >> > > > >> >>----- Original Message - From: &qu

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-03-31 Thread Paul J Stevens
table with myisam and later > convert it to innodb without any error. > > > > - Original Message - From: "Andy Blackshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jorge Bastos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 5:47 PM > Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no sub

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-03-30 Thread Jorge Bastos
error. - Original Message - From: "Andy Blackshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jorge Bastos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 5:47 PM Subject: Re: [Dbmail] (no subject) When you say "doesn't work" do you get any error message (

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-03-30 Thread Jesse Norell
Maybe check your my.cnf for "skip-innodb" (and remove it if it's there). On Thu, 2006-03-30 at 12:40 +0100, Jorge Bastos wrote: > people, sorry my question > > im trying to create the innodb tables to use dbmail 2.1.x but i can't > create them in innodb, mysql only lets mt create them in myisam

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2006-03-30 Thread Jorge Bastos
Decimalpeople, sorry my question im trying to create the innodb tables to use dbmail 2.1.x but i can't create them in innodb, mysql only lets mt create them in myisam, is there any special reason for this? i think this ennabled by default in mysql

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2005-08-11 Thread Tommi Lätti
Greg Muehl wrote: After reading your email I noticed you had 127.0.0.1 in the main.cf like: mailbox_transport = dbmail-lmtp:127.0.0.1:24 I had: mailbox_transport = dbmail-lmtp:localhost:24 I changed mine to look like yours and wallah! Worked without this in the file: disable_dns_lookups=yes

RE: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2005-08-11 Thread Greg Muehl
: [Dbmail] (no subject) Greg Muehl wrote: > Aug 9 16:15:34 redhat postfix/lmtp[12308]: fatal: unexpected > command-line > argument: dbmail-smtp > Aug 9 16:15:35 redhat postfix/master[8569]: warning: > /usr/libexec/postfix/lmtp: bad command startup -- throttling These two lines catch my

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2005-08-11 Thread Tommi Lätti
Greg Muehl wrote: Aug 9 16:15:34 redhat postfix/lmtp[12308]: fatal: unexpected command-line argument: dbmail-smtp Aug 9 16:15:35 redhat postfix/master[8569]: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/lmtp: bad command startup -- throttling These two lines catch my eye... are you possibly trying to talk

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2005-08-09 Thread Greg Muehl
Alright, Well I switched to postfix. Have that running properly. I installed Dbmail vi the INSTALL and INSTALL.postfix docs. I fired up dbmial-pop3d, dbmail-smtpd, and dbmial-lmtpd. I can send mail via the MTA, and I can check POP3 with an outlook client, however when sending mail to the user I a

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2005-06-16 Thread Mikael Syska
https://mailman.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail there you can unsubscribe Lashin wrote: Please,unsubscribe me. Lashin ___ Dbmail mailing list Dbmail@dbmail.org https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2005-06-16 Thread Lashin
Please,unsubscribe me. Lashin

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-11-10 Thread Tim Gurney
@40003fafa08b1bd69834 info msg 176951: bytes 243 from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> qp 6527 uid 0 @40003fafa08b1bf4363c starting delivery 1: msg 176951 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED] @40003fafa08b1bf44dac status: local 1/10 remote 0/20 @40003fafa08b1c342184 delivery 1: failure: Sorry,_no_mailbox_

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-10-24 Thread mikael
Hey > > On Friday, Oct 24, 2003, at 13:40 Europe/Amsterdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > >> hey >> >>> I have made a script for moving from 1.1 to 2.0alpha1. This script can >>> use PostgreSQL or MySQL on input and output. So you can migrate from >>> DBMail 1.1 with MySQL to DBMail 2.0alpha1 with

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-10-24 Thread Ilja Booij
On Friday, Oct 24, 2003, at 13:40 Europe/Amsterdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey I have made a script for moving from 1.1 to 2.0alpha1. This script can use PostgreSQL or MySQL on input and output. So you can migrate from DBMail 1.1 with MySQL to DBMail 2.0alpha1 with PostgreSQL. How stable

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-10-24 Thread mikael
hey > I have made a script for moving from 1.1 to 2.0alpha1. This script can > use PostgreSQL or MySQL on input and output. So you can migrate from > DBMail 1.1 with MySQL to DBMail 2.0alpha1 with PostgreSQL. How stable are 2.0alpla1 and are there many bugs in it?? When will 2.0 stable be release

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-10-24 Thread Ilja Booij
I have made a script for moving from 1.1 to 2.0alpha1. This script can use PostgreSQL or MySQL on input and output. So you can migrate from DBMail 1.1 with MySQL to DBMail 2.0alpha1 with PostgreSQL. This script is included in the source distribution, in the sql/ directory cheers, Ilja On Frid

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-10-24 Thread mikael
Hey, I just wanted to know if there are anyone that have made a script for moving copying a postgresql db to mysql? And if not, are there any one that can make such a script? // ouT // Mikael

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-08-10 Thread Daniel Bryant
heyas :) ok.. the forwarding works cool now, thanks :) the autoresponder im still trying to figure out. i tried using the auto_replies table, but it doesnt seem to work. when i googled, i only found one other guy who had tried auto_replies, and he also couldnt get it to work. any ideas how i

RE: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-08-10 Thread Jesse Norell
7;t really know. Original Message From: Daniel Bryant To: Subject: [Dbmail] (no subject) Sent: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 08:22:17 +1000 > hi again :) > > also wondering if there is an easy to forward to a remote mail address... > > cheers, > Dan. > -- End Original Me

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-08-10 Thread Daniel Bryant
hi again :) also wondering if there is an easy to forward to a remote mail address... cheers, Dan.

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-08-10 Thread Daniel Bryant
heyas... im using dbmail and postfix. im wondering if there is a simple way to allow for autoresponders. and do autoresponders work for each alias or only mailboxes? thanks in advance for any help :) Cheers, Dan.

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-08-07 Thread dbmail
Hi. I like to install Mailman with my dbmail/postfix servers. I have it compile, but I like some examples of the main.cf / master.cf files, transport.cf to help me work it out. Regards, Alejandro Marin

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-06-18 Thread romsun p.
Hello I Install dbmail-1.1 with sendmail. I put option/features MAILER(dbmail)dnl on sendmail.mc (Thanks to Feargal Reilly) and rebulid sendmail. It seems successful but when I restart sendmail from command line, I got an error : Starting Sendmail: 554 5.0.0 /etc/sendmail.cf: line 1451: Mdbmail:

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread OutBack Dingo
We use postfix, dbmail, mysql and squirrelmail and our users have no issues like this at all.. id suspect something else is wrong. On Monday 31 March 2003 14:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hi all. > > In this moment i'm testing my system, qmail + dbmail + squirrelmail and > with my account funct

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread jerco
hi all. In this moment i'm testing my system, qmail + dbmail + squirrelmail and with my account function fine!! BUT*** I have a friend (my beta tester) than report me for him it's imposible delete mail's, i suspect off this and try to conect to your account with your "user:pass" in my compute

RE: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Dave Meador
I am interested in using a friendlier DNS server and/or interface... I use webmin and BIND now ... not too bad for a small site. I don't like that it has to be restarted to take changes. If you have a [partially] working php web front end for djbdns I would like to play with it. :-) Did you have

Re[2]: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello Tim, T> It's not just DJB-religion; Postfix is working better for us than T> Qmail. My problem with DJB *is* that it is a religion for some people, including Dan. I'd have no object to running his DNS server if he'd allow it to be distributed in binary form. Heck, I'd say it should be the S

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
My problem with named is keeping it patched and up-to-date. If you subscribe to bugtraq, you know that 9.2.0, 9.2.1, and 9.2.2 all had critical bugs within a few weeks of each other. That sucked! Even when I was running BIND (9.x.x, chrooted on OpenBSD), that made me nervous. I have administered

Re[2]: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Brenton
Hello Tim, T> Do I deal with our ISP's badly-run BIND servers, or do I roll the dice T> and hope NSI does not obliterate all nameserver entries for our domain T> when I try to promote my djbdns-run primary nameserver to the helm? If you've got djbdns running on a permanent connection, AND you can

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
Quoth Roel Rozendaal - IC&S: > Well i just killed a little bug (cvs has been updated) that caused the > daemons to ignore the -f option - reverting to the default > (/etc/dbmail.conf). Could be that your problem is solved now. On our > systems the trace_level option works just fine; setting it t

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
Rad! This is awesome. Thanks! Ya'll just chopped my system load by 19.5 times :-) Now if I can get that new MX record propagated without Network Solutions destroying the zone again... we discovered that their creepy '60-days-since-a-change' policy about transferring domains (to, say, Joker.com,

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Jesse Norell
dbmail-adduser f [EMAIL PROTECTED] '!cat > /dev/null' > Anyways, if I didn't want to re-map /etc/postfix/transport to only > accept dbmail incoming for certain users, could I somehow alias > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to /dev/null from within dbmail? My > /etc/postfix/transport file is about to have ano

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
Quoth Roel Rozendaal - IC&S: > Well i just killed a little bug (cvs has been updated) that caused the > daemons to ignore the -f option - reverting to the default > (/etc/dbmail.conf). Could be that your problem is solved now. On our > systems the trace_level option works just fine; setting it t

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread
Well i just killed a little bug (cvs has been updated) that caused the daemons to ignore the -f option - reverting to the default (/etc/dbmail.conf). Could be that your problem is solved now. On our systems the trace_level option works just fine; setting it to zero does prevent all logging to m

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
Yes, I reaped and restarted dbmail-imapd. Quoth Roel Rozendaal - IC&S: > you do restart the daemons i assume? > > Tim heeft op maandag, 31 maa 2003 om 16:31 (Europe/Amsterdam) het > volgende geschreven: > > > > > How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog? > > > > It

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
> > > > > How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog? > > > > It just will not peep down. I set TRACE_LEVEL to 5, then 1, then 0... > > no good. I guess I can just stop syslog from listening to mail.* ... > > try TRACE_LEVER = 2 Ah yes, that is what it was original

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread
you do restart the daemons i assume? Tim heeft op maandag, 31 maa 2003 om 16:31 (Europe/Amsterdam) het volgende geschreven: How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog? It just will not peep down. I set TRACE_LEVEL to 5, then 1, then 0... no good. I guess I can j

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread lou
In some email I received from Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 31 Mar 2003 06:31:02 -0800, wrote: > > How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog? > > It just will not peep down. I set TRACE_LEVEL to 5, then 1, then 0... > no good. I guess I can just stop syslog from

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-31 Thread Tim
How can I get dbmail to shut up as far as writing to /var/log/maillog? It just will not peep down. I set TRACE_LEVEL to 5, then 1, then 0... no good. I guess I can just stop syslog from listening to mail.* ... -- "It's just a job. Grass grows, birds fly, waves pound the sand. I j

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-30 Thread Aaron Stone
Based on your idea that we should implement the 'consistency layer' in dbmail, I propose an approach from another angle: consider each machine with mta/dbmail/database to be completely monolithic. The machines do not talk to one another except perhaps by an heartbeat/IP failover. The databases are

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-30 Thread lou k
Aaron Stone writes: An interesting front end is SQL Relay, http://firstworks.com/ My thinking on the database redundancy issue is a compromise with the full-failover and the write-master+read-slaves ideas; There's a main server with read/write (the master) and a slave with read only. Geesh

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-27 Thread Angel Todorov
Lou Kamenov wrote: kinda if(conn1 == fails){ tellus; conn2; if(conn2 == fails) { tellus; return >_err; } } of course with each connect N it`ll try to connect to db1 before >falling back to db2; Imagine the following scenario: the first db just goes down, and stays like that for a long perio

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-09 Thread Jaime Chereau
Hi blake and all. Thanks, very thank you.. I probe your script and in this moment im fine tunning, but function greatm, i only adjust in this a: delete from pbsp where idnr in (select idnr from pbsp where now() - interval \ '10 minutes' >= since) to delete 10 minutes old IP, and done.. thank'

Re: [Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-09 Thread
That means that user blaat isnt logging out the proper way (using quit in the pop session). This happends for example when during a pop session the connection gets closed. regards, Eelco On zondag, maa 9, 2003, at 02:21 Europe/Amsterdam, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi i'm getting this in my

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-03-09 Thread lbelle
hi i'm getting this in my mail.err logs. whats wrong, dbmail/pop3d[19042]: auth_md5_validate(): user [blaat] is validated using APOP dbmail/pop3d[19042]: pop3(): user blaat logged in [messages=3, octets=3242] dbmail/pop3d[19042]: pop3_handle_connection(): error, uncomplete session im using Lo

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2003-01-28 Thread shon
just wondering if anyone knows how to configure dbmail to use pop-before-smtp with postfix? thanks, shon -- "power off einstein" - moe syzlak

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2002-12-04 Thread chris
Hi Roel, On the WU-IMAP-based boxen, we use mbox mailboxes (I know, it's terrible). All users are real users on this box (although that was a requirement of WU-IMAP, not of ours. They don't need to be real users and we'd rather they weren't) and their passwords are all held in /etc/shadow. The [EM

[Dbmail] (no subject)

2002-10-17 Thread
Testmessage _ E.J.A. van Beek ICT Manager IC&S T: +31 30 2322878 F: +31 30 2322305 PGP-key: www.ic-s.nl/keys/eelco.txt