Le vendredi 04 septembre 2020 à 04:26 +0200, Jozef Dassen a écrit :
> The question for me is not about processing JPG, but about
> Cataloguing images.
> Darktable by default is set up to have everything online in some huge
> project.
??? I think I do know darktable but the above sentence makes no
, 2020 at 7:39 PM
From: a...@cybercord.com
To: "Šarūnas" , "darktable-dev@lists.darktable.org"
Subject: RE: [darktable-dev] idea to consider
All,
My first comment after following and using DT for 2 years. The question I have about the discussion about JPG, is why. Modifying JPG&
erstand RAW and just want to take pictures, not capture the art their eye sees.Keep up the good work.Regards,Al F
Original Message ----
Subject: Re: [darktable-dev] idea to consider
From: Šarūnas <saru...@mailbox.org>
Date: Sun, August 30, 2020 9:06 pm
To: darktable-dev@lists.dark
I saw suggestion about substituting the jpg for RAW and possibility of Canon
suing dt for RAW support implementation and I don’t think these are worth
commenting.
Jack.
> On Sep 1, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Per Inge Oestmoen wrote:
>
> People who invest tens of thousands of dollars in high-quality ca
People who invest tens of thousands of dollars in high-quality cameras
and lenses are served by a high-quality RAW converter that can convert
to high-bit TIFF files.
Darktable is such a converter.
There is no compelling reason why we would focus our resources on .jpg
conversion even if it wer
Hi,
Am 30.08.20 um 14:22 schrieb Chris Shelton:
Some photographers work in jpg only and sometimes I would not
question their creative ability while maybe questioning the
technical choice although I suppose they do avoid the mistake of
overworking and gilding the lily
jpeg is usually prefer
On 8/30/20 7:08 PM, Aurélien Pierre wrote:
> 1. that still doesn't give you the jpeg cooking recipe, which is more
> complicated than building an ad-hoc LUT or a tonecurve if local filters
> are applied (and there are),
>
> 2. what is it with people editing jpegs ? That's nonsensical ! Not the
> s
1. that still doesn't give you the jpeg cooking recipe, which is more
complicated than building an ad-hoc LUT or a tonecurve if local filters
are applied (and there are),
2. what is it with people editing jpegs ? That's nonsensical ! Not the
same workflow, not the same maths, not the same filters,
Another possibility is shooting Raw+JPEG. With this option you can still
tune the JPEG engine in the camera somewhat with most models, and if you
need to edit you can go to the Raw file. Also, you can make some minor
edits directly on a JPEG file. Also, for people who are already working
in JPEG, w
Hi,
Camera firmwares that convert raw to jpeg internally rely on proprietary
and undisclosed algorithms. Emulating these is not merely a game of
tuning input parameters, we need to reverse-engineer what algorithms
they use, in what color space, and in which order they are applied, and
repeat × pic
10 matches
Mail list logo
