I saw suggestion about substituting the jpg for RAW and possibility of Canon suing dt for RAW support implementation and I don’t think these are worth commenting.
Jack. > On Sep 1, 2020, at 7:03 PM, Per Inge Oestmoen <p...@coldsiberia.org> wrote: > > People who invest tens of thousands of dollars in high-quality cameras and > lenses are served by a high-quality RAW converter that can convert to > high-bit TIFF files. > > Darktable is such a converter. > > There is no compelling reason why we would focus our resources on .jpg > conversion even if it were technically feasible. > > Per Inge Oestmoen, Norway > > > > Chris Shelton wrote: >> Some photographers work in jpg only and sometimes I would not question >> their creative ability while maybe questioning the technical choice >> although I suppose they do avoid the mistake of overworking and gilding the >> lily >> I thought that the appeal of Darktable could be expanded to include people >> like this by having a facility whereby raw images are batch processed to >> create a set of jpg images in a similar way to the way jpg images are >> created by in-camera processing, maybe in the light table module; there >> would still be the option to work on a raw image as normal. >> I'm a bit overworked myself at the moment and struggle with RSI as you may >> deduce from the voice recognition I use . I did do C and C++ in the 90s >> though it would take a while to get up to speed; maybe one day >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to >> darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
