People who invest tens of thousands of dollars in high-quality cameras
and lenses are served by a high-quality RAW converter that can convert
to high-bit TIFF files.
Darktable is such a converter.
There is no compelling reason why we would focus our resources on .jpg
conversion even if it were technically feasible.
Per Inge Oestmoen, Norway
> Chris Shelton wrote:
Some photographers work in jpg only and sometimes I would not question
their creative ability while maybe questioning the technical choice
although I suppose they do avoid the mistake of overworking and gilding
the lily
I thought that the appeal of Darktable could be expanded to include
people like this by having a facility whereby raw images are batch
processed to create a set of jpg images in a similar way to the way
jpg images are created by in-camera processing, maybe in the light
table module; there would still be the option to work on a raw image as
normal.
I'm a bit overworked myself at the moment and struggle with RSI as you
may deduce from the voice recognition I use . I did do C and C++ in
the 90s though it would take a while to get up to speed; maybe one day
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to
darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
