On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:26:36PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:11:05AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> >> >Op Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:13:23 -0400 schreef Christophe
On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:26:36PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:11:05AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>> >Op Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:13:23 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor:
>> >: On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:36:38AM +0200,
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:11:05AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> >Op Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:13:23 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor:
> >: On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:36:38AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> >: > Op Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:18:13 -0400 schreef
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 12:11:05AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>Op Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:13:23 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
>in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>: On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:36:38AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>: > Op Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:18:13 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
>: > So cygch
Op Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:13:23 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 08:36:38AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > Op Sat, 9 Oct 2004 19:18:13 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
: > So cygcheck will have the same problem...
:
: Right, but cygcheck can rely
On Oct 9 19:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> When I was at Red Hat, I tended to be slightly more lenient about
> assignment obligations for things in the utils directory.
I certainly don't object if we keep it this way.
> Corinna, do you think you could ask you-know-who if we could get a
> waiver
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 12:41:20AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>Op Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:17:55 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
>: Of course, if someone can use cygcheck to diagnose their own problems
>: then, that's great. I don't see any reason to alarm someone with a
>: warning about a minor i
Op Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:17:55 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 01:42:05AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > : > : Why are we bothering with this?
: > : >
: > : > If I may attempt to answer this one... Many people may not know of
: > : > this usage, y
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 01:42:05AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>: > : Why are we bothering with this?
>: >
>: > If I may attempt to answer this one... Many people may not know of
>: > this usage, yet may have their windows path ending on a ';'.
>:
>: I'm sure the same thing is true on UNIX and
Op Wed, 6 Oct 2004 22:15:58 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:05:14AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
[...]
: > s/-v/-h/. (I'm waiting for the other (trailing slash) patch to be
: > applied or rejected, before submitting this.)
:
: I missed the
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:05:14AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>Op Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:58:05 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
>in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>
>[Empty path-components resolving to current dir.]
>
>: > (Maybe the message c
Op Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:49:39 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Oct 6 10:49, Bas van Gompel wrote:
: > Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
: > in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: >
: > [Empty path-components resolving to current dir.]
[...]
: > Are you apply
Op Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:58:05 -0400 schreef Christopher Faylor
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
: On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
[Empty path-components resolving to current dir.]
: > (Maybe the message could get a ``-v'' addition like: ``This will
: > resolve to the current
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote:
>Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
>in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>[Empty path-components resolving to current dir.]
>
>: Oh, interesting. I never even thought about using an empty path.
>
>Nor I. Thw described b
On Oct 6 10:49, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
> in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> [Empty path-components resolving to current dir.]
>
> : Oh, interesting. I never even thought about using an empty path.
>
> Nor I. Thw described behaviour makes th
Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen
in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[Empty path-components resolving to current dir.]
: Oh, interesting. I never even thought about using an empty path.
Nor I. Thw described behaviour makes the warning even more useful (when
cygcheck is run from a
On Oct 5 10:34, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:09:31AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
> >The current directory is specified by a null path name, which can appear
> >immediately after the equal sign, between two colon delimiters anywhere in
> >the path list, or at the end of the p
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 09:09:31AM -0500, Brian Ford wrote:
>On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
>> Chris, I might be missing something but that looks like a bug in
>> conv_path_list to me. Why is conv_fn called with "." for empty
>> strings instead of ignoring the empty path?
>>
>> Is a
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Chris, I might be missing something but that looks like a bug in
> conv_path_list to me. Why is conv_fn called with "." for empty
> strings instead of ignoring the empty path?
>
> Is an empty path component a windowzism I don't know about?
I don't kn
On Oct 5 07:15, Bas van Gompel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This little patch makes cygcheck warn about empty path-components
> (leading/trailing/double ':'/';' in $PATH).
>
>
> ChangeLog-entry:
>
> 2004-10-05 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * cygcheck.cc (dump_sysinfo): Warn about empty p
Hi,
This little patch makes cygcheck warn about empty path-components
(leading/trailing/double ':'/';' in $PATH).
ChangeLog-entry:
2004-10-05 Bas van Gompel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* cygcheck.cc (dump_sysinfo): Warn about empty path-components.
--- src/winsup/utils/cygcheck.cc4
21 matches
Mail list logo
