On Oct 9 19:18, Christopher Faylor wrote: > When I was at Red Hat, I tended to be slightly more lenient about > assignment obligations for things in the utils directory.
I certainly don't object if we keep it this way. > Corinna, do you think you could ask you-know-who if we could get a > waiver for cygcheck changes? It doesn't seem like cygcheck provides > any core cygwin functionality. > > We might even consider changing the license if Red Hat is amenable. I've written a mail to you-know-who (I guess it's the same you-know-who as the you-know-who you were thinking of), asking if we can change the licensing of the utils directory to something relaxed (BSD, actually). Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Red Hat, Inc.
