On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:49:09AM +0200, Bas van Gompel wrote: >Op Tue, 5 Oct 2004 16:46:49 +0200 schreef Corinna Vinschen >in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >[Empty path-components resolving to current dir.] > >: Oh, interesting. I never even thought about using an empty path. > >Nor I. Thw described behaviour makes the warning even more useful (when >cygcheck is run from a command/cmd prompt). > >Are you applying the patch? > >(Maybe the message could get a ``-v'' addition like: ``This will >resolve to the current directory when in cygwin''.)
I see that Corinna has checked this in but I really don't see the need for a warning for a perfectly acceptable use of an empty PATH component. Why are we bothering with this? cgf
