On Apr 25 06:33, David Stacey wrote:
> Coverity Scan [1] is a commercial (paid for) static analysis tool, but
> they offer it to Open Source programmes for free. I was having a browse
> through the list of Open Source programmes using Coverity Scan, and
> noticed that Cygwin wasn't listed. Would th
THANK YOU FOR YOUR MAIL.
NGUYEN THI THU HUONG
Director
Mobile: 0939..38
---
PRODINCOM PHARMA CO.,LTD
I-7 Bis Chau Thoi Street, 15 Ward , District 10, Ho Chi Minh city
Tel: 08.3977.8301
Fax: 08. 3977.8302
Email: thuhu...@prodincompharma.vn
--
Problem
2014-04-25 10:35 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen:
> Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
> with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since
> everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt.
> Teeth-gnashingly.
There are other alter
--- On Fri, 2014/4/25, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
> On 2014-04-23 22:15, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > I tried to build wxWidgets-3.0.0 on Cygwin.
> > For Cygwin x86, the build was successful.
> >
> > However, on Cygwin x86_64, the build failed at compling a cpp source file
> > (src/common/appbase.cpp
On Apr 24 18:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 24 11:34, Douglas Coup wrote:
> > If I do "which rm" and "which chmod", it shows that both commands
> > resolve to the Cygwin binaries.
> >
> > The attached rm.notworking.trace file is from an "rm -f dac.txt"
> > command that gets the permission de
On Apr 25 11:10, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
> 2014-04-25 10:35 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen:
> > Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
> > with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since
> > everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adap
On 25/04/14 09:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
There are some conditions associated with using Coverity Scan [2]. The
one thing that jumps out is that our relationship with RedHat might be
a stumbling block. We can but ask - the worst that can happen is that
they politely decline.
They will.
On Apr 25 13:19, David Stacey wrote:
> On 25/04/14 09:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> There are some conditions associated with using Coverity Scan [2]. The
> >> one thing that jumps out is that our relationship with RedHat might be
> >> a stumbling block. We can but ask - the worst that can ha
Objective Systems, Inc.
REAL WORLD ASN.1 AND XML SOLUTIONS
Tel: +1 (484) 875-9841
Fax: +1 (484) 875-9830
Toll-free: (877) 307-6855 (USA only)
http://www.obj-sys.com
On 4/25/2014 8:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 24 18:36, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 24 11:34, Douglas Coup wrote:
If I
On Apr 25 10:23, Douglas Coup wrote:
>
> Objective Systems, Inc.
> REAL WORLD ASN.1 AND XML SOLUTIONS
> Tel: +1 (484) 875-9841
> Fax: +1 (484) 875-9830
> Toll-free: (877) 307-6855 (USA only)
> http://www.obj-sys.com
>
> On 4/25/2014 8:16 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 24 18:36, Corinna Vin
> -Original Message-
> Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 6:33 AM
> > >> There have been a few hints on this list about a possible move
> > >> from CVS to git. If such a move were on the cards then that should
> > >> probably happen first - I wouldn't want the nugatory effor
I downloaded the x86/cygwin-inst-20140425.tar.xz file. I assume all I
need to do is run tar xvf against this file? From the output it
certainly looked like it installed the files.
But I'm not seeing any difference. I'm still seeing the permission
denied error on rm -f in the scen
Please don't top-post. Thanks.
On Apr 25 11:30, Douglas Coup wrote:
> I downloaded the x86/cygwin-inst-20140425.tar.xz file. I assume all
> I need to do is run tar xvf against this file? From the output it
> certainly looked like it installed the files.
No. Just download th
On Apr 25 17:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 25 11:30, Douglas Coup wrote:
> > Incidentally, the sequence below should have nothing to do with Perforce.
> >
> > $ touch dac.txt
> > $ chmod 444 dac.txt
> > $ rm -f dac.txt
> >
> > This is being done completely outside of any Perforce workspace
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:35:00AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 25 06:33, David Stacey wrote:
>> Coverity Scan [1] is a commercial (paid for) static analysis tool, but
>> they offer it to Open Source programmes for free. I was having a browse
>> through the list of Open Source programmes
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:17:19PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Apr 25 11:10, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
>> 2014-04-25 10:35 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen:
>> > Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
>> > with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since
>
On Apr 25 15:24, Jim Garrison wrote:
> > Corinna Vinschen
> > > >Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
> > > >with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since
> > > >everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt.
> > > >Teeth-g
Hi,
I'm still having issues with applications which use alternative screen for
output (LESS, MAN). When I exit that application, its output stays on
screen, prompt is displayed over it.
My system is as follows:
OS: Windows 7 Home 64 bit
Cygwin: 1.7.29 64 bit
Console emulator: ConEmu 140416 64
I have a 64-bit Windows laptop, and installed Cygwin several years ago.
I wish to verify that I did install the 64-bit installation.
I get the following results:
cygcheck -V
cygcheck (cygwin) 1.7.15
uname
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64
If I did install the 64-bit version, when I rebuild my Linux app on
Cyg
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 05:20:21PM +, Dawid Ferenczy wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm still having issues with applications which use alternative screen for
>output (LESS, MAN). When I exit that application, its output stays on
>screen, prompt is displayed over it.
>
>My system is as follows:
>
>OS: Window
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 01:26:22PM -0400, Tom Szczesny wrote:
>I have a 64-bit Windows laptop, and installed Cygwin several years ago.
>I wish to verify that I did install the 64-bit installation.
>I get the following results:
>
>cygcheck -V
>cygcheck (cygwin) 1.7.15
>
>uname
>CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64
>
On 4/25/2014 1:38 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 01:26:22PM -0400, Tom Szczesny wrote:
I have a 64-bit Windows laptop, and installed Cygwin several years ago.
I wish to verify that I did install the 64-bit installation.
I get the following results:
cygcheck -V
cygcheck (
e:
I downloaded the x86/cygwin-inst-20140425.tar.xz file. I assume all
I need to do is run tar xvf against this file? From the output it
certainly looked like it installed the files.
No. Just download the DLL and only install the DLL in place of the old
DLL. Installing the tar inst file under C
result from uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 Toshiba 1.7.17(0.262/5/3) 2012-10-19 14:39 i686 Cygwin
Sorry that I was not clear.
I have an open source app (hosted on github.com) that was developed
for Linux. It compiles and works on Windows-64 using my current
version of Cygwin, but I suspect that I a
Op 25-4-2014 20:13 Tom Szczesny schreef:
result from uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 Toshiba 1.7.17(0.262/5/3) 2012-10-19 14:39 i686 Cygwin
uname -a on 64 bit cygwin should say something like:
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 PC2 1.7.28(0.271/5/3) 2014-02-09 21:06 x86_64 Cygwin
Note there is no "WOW64", and there
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:53:24AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> We use coverity at work. It is annoying and it does have false positive
> but a lot of what look like false positives often turn out to be: "Oh,
> wait. (#*(&$ Yeah. That's a problem."
I use Coverity as well, and I find it
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 08:21:57PM +0200, Erwin Waterlander wrote:
>Op 25-4-2014 20:13 Tom Szczesny schreef:
>> result from uname -a
>> CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 Toshiba 1.7.17(0.262/5/3) 2012-10-19 14:39 i686 Cygwin
>
>uname -a on 64 bit cygwin should say something like:
>
>CYGWIN_NT-6.1 PC2 1.7.28(0.27
On Apr 25 14:11, Douglas Coup wrote:
> On 4/25/2014 11:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Apr 25 11:30, Douglas Coup wrote:
> >>I downloaded the x86/cygwin-inst-20140425.tar.xz file. I assume all
> >>I need to do is run tar xvf against this file? From the output it
&
:
On Apr 25 11:30, Douglas Coup wrote:
I downloaded the x86/cygwin-inst-20140425.tar.xz file. I assume all
I need to do is run tar xvf against this file? From the output it
certainly looked like it installed the files.
No. Just download the DLL and only install the DLL in place of the old
DLL
> On 24/04/2014 03:45, Bill Border wrote:
> > When I first installed Cygwin about 2 years ago, in the setup program I was
> > able to search for and install the ploticus package.
> >
> > I just re-downloaded the Cygwin setup program and when I search for
> > ploticus it is not found.
> >
> > Was
On Apr 25 15:51, Douglas Coup wrote:
> On 4/25/2014 3:16 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > Can you please try something else? I'm wondering if
> >that's not a problem analogue of the one described in
> >http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948252.
> >
> >The "fix" from that KB applied to your case:
> >
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 25 15:24, Jim Garrison wrote:
>> > Corinna Vinschen
>> > > >Yeah, I'm n ot exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
>> > > >with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since
>> > > >everybody else is so
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> > > >Yeah, I'm not exactly looking forward to it since I'm very familiar
>> > > >with CVS or SVN, but have nothing but trouble with git. But since
>> > > >everybody else is so very happy with git, I guess I'll have to adapt.
>> > > >Teeth-gnashingly.
>
> Yeah, I'm tryin
On 4/25/2014 11:26, Tom Szczesny wrote:
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64
"WOW64" means 32-bit Windows emulated on top of 64-bit Windows.[1] This
tells you that Cygwin is running inside that 32-bit environment.
If I did install the 64-bit version, when I rebuild my Linux app on
Cygwin, do I automatical
Version 1.06-1 of perl-Text-CSV_XS has been uploaded.
CHANGE LOG
==
1.06- 2014-04-20, H.Merijn Brand
- Fix possible fail in tests on Windows (Thanks Mithaldu for
explaing)
- Only close file handles in csv () for files
- new callbacks for csv ()
DESCRIPTION
=
Warren Young wrote:
On 4/25/2014 11:26, Tom Szczesny wrote:
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64
"WOW64" means 32-bit Windows emulated on top of 64-bit Windows.[1] This
tells you that Cygwin is running inside that 32-bit environment.
[snip]
You don't have to guess and hope, though. From 32-bit Cygwin:
$ f
Greetings, Dawid Ferenczy!
>it's not a big deal, I just wonder what to execute, if I would like to
> execute user's default shell (defined in /etc/passwd). For example in
> cmd.exe,
> ConEmu or Console2. I don't want to hardcode a shell anywhere (in console
> emulator configuration, some ba
Greetings, Larry Hall (Cygwin)!
>> It looks like /etc/profile sets LC_ALL=C before running the scripts
>> in /etc/profile.d, then restores it to its original setting. This
>> prevents LANG getting set by lang.sh.
>>
> Good catch. Yes, the latest version of base_files makes this change to
> the p
Greetings, Jim Garrison!
>> -Original Message-
>> Corinna Vinschen
>> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2014 6:33 AM
>> > >> There have been a few hints on this list about a possible move
>> > >> from CVS to git. If such a move were on the cards then that should
>> > >> probably happen first - I
The following package has been updated for the Cygwin distribution:
* check-0.9.12-1
Check is a unit test framework for C.
This is an update to the latest upstream version.
Yaakov
CYGWIN-ANNOUNCE UNSUBSCRIBE INFO
If you want to unsubscribe from the cygwin-a
The following packages have been updated for both arches:
* curl-7.36.0-1
* libcurl4-7.36.0-1
* libcurl-devel-7.36.0-1
* libcurl-doc-7.36.0-1
cURL is a library and command line tool for transferring data with URL
syntax, supporting numerous protocols, SSL certificates, HTTP POST, HTTP
PUT, FTP
The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution:
*** vim-7.4.264-1
*** vim-common-7.4.264-1
*** vim-minimal-7.4.264-1
*** xxd-7.4.264-1
*** gvim-7.4.264-1
Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the
de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete fe
On 4/26/2014 07:27, Andrey Repin wrote:
> This is exactly what makes me dislike it strongly. This, and idiotic model of
> copying whole repository to my machine, when I only want to glance at the
> source code, and find the culprit of my current issues.
> I've spent 3 hours downloading a 200Mb repo
On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 08:42:34AM +0800, JonY wrote:
> On 4/26/2014 07:27, Andrey Repin wrote:
> > This is exactly what makes me dislike it strongly. This, and idiotic model
> > of
> > copying whole repository to my machine, when I only want to glance at the
> > source code, and find the culprit
Andrey Repin writes:
> This is exactly what makes me dislike it strongly. This, and idiotic model of
> copying whole repository to my machine, when I only want to glance at the
> source code, and find the culprit of my current issues.
[…]
You might want to learn about shallow clones, but unless yo
Everyone:
Maybe it isn't clear but, with the exception of newlib, the rest of the
repository in which Cygwin used to reside has moved to git. Cygwin is
moving too, soon. I actually had planned on doing this last year before
Corinna asked me to stop (it was apparently going to impact the x86_64
po
46 matches
Mail list logo
