On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:53:24AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: > We use coverity at work. It is annoying and it does have false positive > but a lot of what look like false positives often turn out to be: "Oh, > wait. (#*(&$ Yeah. That's a problem."
I use Coverity as well, and I find it to be excellent. The latest version finds copy and paste errors. In particular, it recently issued two complaints about such errors. In both cases, Coverity was correct, a developer really had done copy-and-paste twice, introducing an error each time. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
