cygwin uninstall

hi, I have one problem with cygwin. I can't uninstall it . there is no uninstall option in the program group also there is no such option in add/remove. I wanted to make another clean install but can't do that without removing first installation. any ideas how to do it? radek -- Unsubscribe in

RE: Permissions get lost when moving files between drives.

At 01:52 AM 1/19/2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: >> There's no need to Cc: me, I read the list, hence the >> Reply-To. Please >> make sure your mailer respects that. > >I'm sorry. Since I received the message as e-mail (from: you, to: David >Korn, >Cc: me and the list), I thought I would have

Re: cygwin uninstall

At 02:15 AM 1/19/2004, radek you wrote: >hi, > >I have one problem with cygwin. I can't uninstall it . there is no uninstall >option in the program group also there is no such option in add/remove. I wanted >to make another clean install but can't do that without removing first >installation. any

SSH key authentification problem

Hello, I'm trying to setup a CVS over SSH connection between a windows 2k PC and a linux server. Since my CVS client is the one embedded in JBuilder9, we need to establish a passwordless authentification, thus using keys. I've installed cygwin and followed the instructions found here : http://mini

Re: SSH key authentification problem

Marc, I had Saturday the same problem in the course I am giving. After a few minutes, it started to dawn : check your access rights : $HOME/.ssh should be rwx-- (700) $HOME/.ssh/* should be rw--- (600) Jurgen "Marc Poppleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19

Re: SSH key authentification problem

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:44:25AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Marc, > > I had Saturday the same problem in the course I am > giving. After a few minutes, it started to dawn : check > your access rights : > $HOME/.ssh should be rwx-- (700) > $HOME/.ssh/* should be rw--- (600) And yo

RE: SSH key authentification problem

Jurgen and Olaf, I have done as you suggested: chmod 700 .ssh chmod 600 .ssh/* Nothing different when I try my ssh -i id_dsa [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've tried giving a wrong filename and I got an answer saying this file didn't exist (which is normal). Here is what I get when I do ssh

RE: SSH key authentification problem

Marc, My suggestion missed the fact that these settings should be done on the Linux side ! Jurgen "Marc Poppleton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/19/2004 11:05 AM To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: (bcc: Jurgen Defurne/BRG/CE/PHILIPS) Subj

Re: MS offers "Services For Unix" free of charge

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:29:53AM +0100, S. L. wrote: > [...] > > > It would be rather interesting to add nfs to cygwin. We could develop > > > filesystem "plug-ins" which could be generalized for stuff like NFS, > > > EXTFS, etc. > > > > > > Didn't someone say they had a free month? Perfect pr

RE: SSH key authentification problem

Whops! chmod 777 to reverse then! :) I omited to say that I have absolutely no control on the Linux side (and, just to make it easier, the admin is out for the day). Looking at the debug log, I guess that this: debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password debug1: Ne

Re: SSH key authentification problem

Marc Poppleton wrote: > debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password > debug1: Next authentication method: publickey > debug1: Trying private key: /cygdrive/c/.ssh/identity > debug1: Trying private key: /cygdrive/c/.ssh/id_rsa > debug1: Offering public key: /cygdrive/c/.ssh/id_dsa

RE: SSH key authentification problem

> The problem's probably on the server end. It must be configured to > accept pubkey auth, as well as having your public key installed > properly. You can see that the client tries pubkey but it's not > accepted. Yes, this is what it looks like to me. > So, none of us are mindreaders here, and w

RE: SSH key authentification problem

On 19 January 2004 12:06 +0100 Marc Poppleton wrote: > The problem's probably on the server end. It must be configured to > accept pubkey auth, as well as having your public key installed > properly. You can see that the client tries pubkey but it's not > accepted. Yes, this is what it looks like

Re: Unimplemented ANSI C library and UNIX function calls??

Hello Alvyn, you wrote: > Wish this mail does not go into a wrong account. I am a new user of this > mailing list. Please forgive me if I make any mistake. Thanks. > I browsed the FAQ and raised a question, "Are the unimplemented ANSI C > library functions important for us?" > After the install

RE: SSH key authentification problem

Marc, To summarise : probably you can log in from Cygwin to the Linux box using your username and password. This is the first step. When you have logged in onto your Linux account, you are most probably in your home directory. There, you should enter the command 'ls -al' and look for the .ssh dir

Re: SSH key authentification problem

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 12:06:54 +0100, Marc Poppleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > The problem's probably on the server end. It must be configured to > > accept pubkey auth, as well as having your public key installed > > properly. You can see that t

Re: SSH key authentification problem

Marc Poppleton wrote: > > So, none of us are mindreaders here, and we have zero information about > > the configuration details of your sshd, which isn't even running > > Cygwin... So, don't don't be surprised if you are underwhelmed with > > help. > > Well, concerning running Cygwin, I get the s

RE: SSH key authentification problem

> There is not a lot else the Cygwin list can help with as it appears from > the verbose output you previously posted that the Cygwin ssh client is > doing exactly what it should and the problem lies with the Linux sshd > server. That all I actually needed to know! :) I was affraid that something

rsh as NONE SYSTEM user = permission denied

Has anyone gotten rsh to work with a none system user? I've followed the guide inetutils-1.3.2.README. telnet works fine but a simple: rsh -l myuser "ls /" fails with: Permission denied. Anyone got any ideas? N.B. anyway of getting a log file out of rshd? Steve ==

Re: Can't delete file

If you have any trouble with the method below (which should work just fine, AFAICT) you should be able to rename the file in explorer to something much more friendly, i.e. delfile.dat, and then simply delete it. Seth Rubin wrote: All DOS files are also stored in 8.3 name format. Your file is p

Re: Memory Management on AMD64 in 32-bit mode

Benson Margulies wrote: Would anyone be willing to elaborate on how the existing code is going about accomplishing the task at hand? If not, at least knowing that this is the goal of the exercise should make it easier to get a clue. I believe that there is some documentation in a file in the CVS f

Re: Can't delete file

Thanks for the suggestion Kleven, but neither did the suggestion below work: C:\TEMP\downloads\nutch-2003-11-17\www.greece101.com>dir /x Volume in drive C is C Drive Volume Serial Number is 9C5F-537E Directory of C:\TEMP\downloads\nutch-2003-11-17\www.greece101.com 01/18/2004 09:50p

RE: Can't delete file

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Aurangzeb M. Agha > Thanks for the suggestion Kleven, but neither did the suggestion below > work: > > C:\TEMP\downloads\nutch-2003-11-17\www.greece101.com>dir /x Here, maybe this will work: try shortening the overlong path by

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

I've made a new version of the Cygwin DLL and associated utilities available for download. As usual, a list of what has changed is below. I'd like to send a special thanks to Thomas Pfaff who is stepping down as the cygwin pthreads maintainer. His efforts in improving pthreads functionality were

RE: SSH key authentification problem

At 07:56 AM 1/19/2004, Marc Poppleton you wrote: >> There is not a lot else the Cygwin list can help with as it appears from >> the verbose output you previously posted that the Cygwin ssh client is >> doing exactly what it should and the problem lies with the Linux sshd >> server. > >That all I ac

Re: rsh as NONE SYSTEM user = permission denied

At 08:02 AM 1/19/2004, Steven Hartland you wrote: >Has anyone gotten rsh to work with a none system >user? I've followed the guide inetutils-1.3.2.README. >telnet works fine but a simple: >rsh -l myuser "ls /" >fails with: >Permission denied. > >Anyone got any ideas? N.B. anyway of getting a log fi

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

Thank you cgf - I've been eagerly awaiting this. And thanks to all who have contributed to bringing this release about. I know it's a big one with a lot of "deep in the bowels of the code" changes. Should be the best Cygwin yet. By the way Chris, when will 1.5.7 be ready? ;-)( Anyone wanting

INT64_MAX incorrectly defined in stdint.h

I noticed that the release notes for today's new release claims the following: - Correctly define *64_MAX. (Corinna Vinschen) I have the latest version, as far as I know, since I ran "update" today. First, I noticed no change to stdint.h. Second, I noticed that INT64_MAX is still incor

RE: INT64_MAX incorrectly defined in stdint.h

Hold up... I changed mirror sites and now I'm getting a big fat download. I guess the mirror I used hadn't caught the new release yet. I'm still downloading, but I figure this will solve the problem. Sorry. -Original Message- From: Mija Gourlay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday,

Re: MS offers "Services For Unix" free of charge

FYI: The 3.0 version went up for the cost of the CD a few months ago so I ordered a copy -- was a disk hog, so eventually removed it. But few things: It always has to have the "interix" subsystem proces running to do anything. In typical MS fashion, it setup and started demons for all

Re: man 1.5k-2 is broken

> "Larry" == Larry Hall writes: Larry> At 11:03 AM 1/18/2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia you wrote: >> The file /usr/share/misc/man.conf specifies less flags as "-is". >> This must be set to "-isrR" to work with groff's default tty output >> using SGR codes. Larry> If you h

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

I followed the installation instructions here, but the cygwin1.dll file does not update. Just the packages are updated. The date on cygwin1.dll is 2003-09-20, obviously not the newest. Is there something else I need to do to make sure the dll gets updated? Thanks. Barry Drake --- Christopher F

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

> -Original Message- > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Barry Drake > > I followed the installation instructions here, but the > cygwin1.dll file does not update. Just the packages are > updated. The date on cygwin1.dll is 2003-09-20, obviously > not the newest. > > Is there somethi

RE: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

Dave, Thank you. I'll try the upgrade later. Barry --- Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: cygwin-owner On Behalf Of Barry Drake > > > > I followed the installation instructions here, but > the > > cygwin1.dll file does not update. Just the > packa

'make check' is having a laugh at my expense...

Something's gone wrong with "make check". I just updated from the CVS, deleted my build tree and rebuilt the .dll, and now the testsuite just gives me all these error messages: ---snip--- Using /usr/build/src/winsup/testsuite/config/default.exp as tool-and-target-specific interface file. Runni

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:57:12AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Thank you cgf - I've been eagerly awaiting this. And thanks to all who >have contributed to bringing this release about. I know it's a big one >with a lot of "deep in the bowels of the code" changes. Should be the >best Cygwin y

Re: cygwin/regex is non-POSIX

> * Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-17 21:04:50 -0800]: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 03:14:57PM -0500, Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> the cygwin regex is not POSIX. >> backrefs are not available by default (apparently you need REG_BACKR for >> that), "(a|)*" cannot

fetchmail problem with latest cygwin-1.5.6-1

Hi fetchmail doesn't work with the latest cygwin-1.5.6-1. See below: fetchmail: starting fetchmail 6.2.5 daemon fetchmail: 213 messages (206 seen) for Dr.Volker.Zell at rgmemeaimap.oraclecorp.com. fetchmail: skipping message [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1 not flushed fetchmail: skipping message [EMAIL PRO

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

Barry, It's also possible you had some Cygwin program (or service) running while you updated, so cygwin1.dll was in use and setup wasn't able to overwrite it. Look in /var/log/setup.log for "Scheduled reboot replacement"... If it's present, reboot, and cygwin1.dll will get updated. HTH,

Re: man 1.5k-2 is broken

On Sunday, January 18, 2004 8:44 PM [GMT-5], Larry Hall wrote: > At 11:03 AM 1/18/2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia you wrote: >> The file /usr/share/misc/man.conf specifies less flags as "-is". >> This must be set to "-isrR" to work with groff's default tty output >> using SGR codes. > > > If you ha

Is cygwin really for me? (Need c++ compiler)

I've been a cygwin user for quite a while, but I still consider myself a newbie. I have access to Visual C++ 6.0, but not permanently. I want to be able to compile c++ code that I can easily distribute without licensing problems (because I write software for a University research lab, at some p

Re: Is cygwin really for me? (Need c++ compiler)

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 02:13:39PM -0500, Andrew Sasak wrote: >I've been a cygwin user for quite a while, but I still consider myself >a newbie. I have access to Visual C++ 6.0, but not permanently. I >want to be able to compile c++ code that I can easily distribute >without licensing problems (b

Re: fetchmail problem with latest cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:00:54PM +0100, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >fetchmail doesn't work with the latest cygwin-1.5.6-1. See below: Yeah. Volker, remember how I was praising you earlier because you always had nicely researched and well-defined error reports? You've been slipping. 1) cygcheck ou

Re: Is cygwin really for me? (Need c++ compiler)

I welcome any input I can get, to the list or to me personally. I figure there are many people here who have been exposed to other tools, etc, that I have never heard of. From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is cygwin really

Re: man 1.5k-2 is broken

At 02:08 PM 1/19/2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia you wrote: >On Sunday, January 18, 2004 8:44 PM [GMT-5], >Larry Hall wrote: > >> At 11:03 AM 1/18/2004, Alejandro Lopez-Valencia you wrote: >>> The file /usr/share/misc/man.conf specifies less flags as "-is". >>> This must be set to "-isrR" to work wi

Re: Is cygwin really for me? (Need c++ compiler)

But you missed Chris's point. This list isn't for discussing, comparing, contrasting, and general sharing on the best way to compile apps for Windows and other platforms. While there may be folks on this list that can provide you with some input on your inquiry, continuing this discussion here o

Re: Is cygwin really for me? (Need c++ compiler)

Ahhh. sorry. _ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1 -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem

Re: cygwin/regex is non-POSIX

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:54:06PM -0500, Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-17 21:04:50 -0800]: That's cute. But what if a real address matches a rot13'd one? > > Also, it says backr

'info' observations and questions

I'd found that info v4.2 was not working for me, % info info "info: dir: No such file or directory" Playing around with it for a while, it seems that info works best when INFOPATH is not defined and /usr/info/dir, rather than /usr/share/info/dir, is the primary index. Even when an up-to-d

Cygwin without Win32

The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new "highly tuned" POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX subsystem are within 10% performance of Windows apps using the Win32 subsystem. The security models also work together so that chmod/chown/su and friends a

Re: 'info' observations and questions

At 03:33 PM 1/19/2004, Doug Wyatt you wrote: >I don't know where the info.exe source is - doing a setup >package search for info or info.exe does not seem to be >helpful in locating it. Any hints? Sure. HTH, -- Larry Hall

Re: cygwin without Win32

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:37:27PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: >The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new >"highly tuned" POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX >subsystem are within 10% performance of Windows apps using the Win32 >subsystem. The securit

Re: Cygwin without Win32

At 03:37 PM 1/19/2004, Dax Kelson you wrote: >The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new >"highly tuned" POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX >subsystem are within 10% performance of Windows apps using the Win32 >subsystem. The security models also w

cygwin source-patch fixing deadlock while writing to serial port

I found a potential deadlock while writing to a serial port (e.g. /dev/com1) that has been opened as O_RDWR. The deadlock occurs from time to time (not sure about exact conditions) when I write to that port, while there is data coming in (e.g. from an external device) and I do not read away tha

Re: cygwin source-patch fixing deadlock while writing to serial port

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:08:39PM +0100, H. Henning Schmidt wrote: >I found a potential deadlock while writing to a serial port (e.g. >/dev/com1) that has been opened as O_RDWR. The deadlock occurs from time >to time (not sure about exact conditions) when I write to that port, >while there is d

Re: package conffiles (was: man 1.5k-2 is broken)

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alejandro >Lopez-Valencia >Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 11:08 AM >To: Cygwin List >Subject: Re: man 1.5k-2 is broken > >On Sunday, January 18, 2004 8:44 PM [GMT-5], >Larry Hall wrote: > >> At 11:03 AM 1/1

regtool freezes on XP (Was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1)

3/11/07 C:\cygwin\bin\cygperl5_8_2.dll - os=4.0 img=1.0 sys=4.0 "cygperl5_8_2.dll" v0.0 ts=2003/11/7 6:08 108k 2001/06/28 C:\cygwin\bin\cygreadline4.dll - os=4.0 img=1.0 sys=4.0 "cygreadline4.dll" v0.0 ts=2001/1/6 23:34 148k 2003/08/10 C:\c

Re: cygwin source-patch fixing deadlock while writing to serial port

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:08:39PM +0100, H. Henning Schmidt wrote: > >I found a potential deadlock while writing to a serial port (e.g. > >/dev/com1) that has been opened as O_RDWR. The deadlock occurs from time > >to time (not sure about exact con

Re: cygwin/regex is non-POSIX

> * U-DHX98431\sthoenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-19 12:13:58 -0800]: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:54:06PM -0500, Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > * Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-17 21:04:50 -0800]: > That's cute. But what if a real address matches a rot13'

Compile dclock fails

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ gzip -dc dclock_2.1.2.orig.tar.gz |tar xvf - dclock/ dclock/Dclock.c dclock/Dclock.h dclock/DclockP.h dclock/Imakefile dclock/README dclock/TODO dclock/dclock.c dclock/Dclock.ad dclock/sounds/ dclock/sounds/bell.wav dclock/sounds/digital.wav dclock/dclock.1 dclock/Makefile.ori

Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?

I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: "The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll" How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by the following changes ? - Make tmpfile 64-bit aware. (Corinna Vinschen) - Ma

RE: regtool freezes on XP (Was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwi n-1.5.6-1)

On Mon, January 19, 2004, Rolf Campbell wrote: > When I run this script *not* from another cygwin program (Windows Run > menu as "bash -c scriptname.sh", or from W32 GNU Emacs) > ---begin script > #!/bin/sh > echo -n Getting location... > regtool get '\' > ---end script > I get the expect

Re: regtool freezes on XP (Was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1)

I think the problem is bash, not regtool. The following script also displays the problem: ---begin script--- #!/bin/sh ls ---end script--- Running the script through /bin/sh makes the problem go away. (I.e., execute "sh -c scriptname.sh" from the Run menu.) Dave Rolf Campbell wrote: When I r

Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:43:51PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: >I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: > >"The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the >dynamic link library cygwin1.dll" > >How many Cygwin applications are supposed to be affected by

Re: man 1.5k-2 is broken

> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Lopez-Valencia writes: Alejandro> IMAO, the maintainer should have fixed the obvious bug (and Alejandro> documented blunder!) of not using "-isrR" in man-1.5m2-1 by Alejandro> modifying the postinstall script to backup the old man.conf file if Alejand

[OT] Re: cygwin/regex is non-POSIX

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Sam Steingold wrote: > > * U-DHX98431\sthoenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-19 12:13:58 -0800]: > > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:54:06PM -0500, Sam Steingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > * Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-17 21:04:50 -0800]: > > That

Re: Re: Re: CPAN Upload: N/NI/NI-S/Tk-804.025_beta14.patch.gz

Dominix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >from my point of view Cygwin expand a lot Win32 capabilities with a very >small footprint, and as a serious Open source project it had a very >responsive support throught his mailling list ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) that you >can browse throught NNTP, thanks to gmane

Re: Compile dclock fails

Yup, it does fail. This is because it's written in improper C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ gzip -dc dclock_2.1.2.orig.tar.gz |tar xvf - dclock/ dclock/Dclock.c dclock/Dclock.h dclock/DclockP.h dclock/Imakefile dclock/README dclock/TODO dclock/dclock.c dclock/Dclock.ad dclock/s

Re: Cygwin/DBD::ODBC issue

On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:34:35PM -0800, Rafael Kitover wrote: > >There is nameclash, postgresql-7.4.1-3 includes the file > >/usr/include/sqltypes.h and libiodbc-3.51.1 includes a file with the > >same name, additional there is a file with the same name included in > >the w32api-2.4-1 package, th

Re: cygwin source-patch fixing deadlock while writing to serial port

> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:08:39PM +0100, H. Henning Schmidt wrote: > >I found a potential deadlock while writing to a serial port (e.g. > >/dev/com1) that has been opened as O_RDWR. The deadlock occurs from time > >to time (not sure about exact conditions) when I write to that port, > >while the

Re: cygwin source-patch fixing deadlock while writing to serial port

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, H. Henning Schmidt wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:08:39PM +0100, H. Henning Schmidt wrote: > > > >I found a potential deadlock while writing to a serial port (e.g. > > > >/dev/com1) that has been opened as O_RDWR. The deadlock occurs from time > > > >to time (not sure

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:56:41AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > I've made a new version of the Cygwin DLL and associated utilities > available for download. As usual, a list of what has changed is below. Nice job. Thanks. > - Implement System V shm, sem, msg handling in cygserver. (Corin

Re: cygwin without Win32

Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:37:27PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new "highly tuned" POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX subsystem are within 10% performance of Windows apps using the W

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > + Making IPC::SysV (dynamic) ... > +LD_RUN_PATH="" ld2 -L/usr/local/lib SysV.o -o ../../../lib/auto/IPC/SysV/SysV.dll > ../../../libperl.dll.a -lcygipc > +gcc -shared -o SysV.dll -Wl,--out-i

Re: cygwin without Win32

At 07:12 PM 1/19/2004, Andrew DeFaria you wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:37:27PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: >> >>>The newly released Microsoft Services For Unix (SFU v3.5) includes a new "highly >>>tuned" POSIX subsystem. MS says that UNIX apps using the POSIX subsy

Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?

Damn, no listing of the 12?.? Christopher Faylor wrote: On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:43:51PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meunier wrote: I compiled Lynx under 1.5.6 and tried to run it under 1.5.5: "The procedure entry point _fcntl64 could not be located in the dynamic link library cygwin1.dll" How many

Re: cygwin without Win32

Larry Hall wrote: > >Has anybody actually measured how many 9x/Me Cygwin users there are compared with > >NT and greater? > > No, not that has been reported to this list anyway. I wonder how close to an approximation of reality a simple poll/form on the cygwin.com front page would generate? B

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

Christopher Faylor wrote: > > I've made a new version of the Cygwin DLL and associated utilities > available for download. As usual, a list of what has changed is below. Again, thanks for all your work. > - Fix problems programs which need a console available when running on a > pty. (Christop

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Brian Dessent wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > I've made a new version of the Cygwin DLL and associated utilities > > available for download. As usual, a list of what has changed is below. > > Again, thanks for all your work. Ditto! > > - Fix problems programs whi

RE: Can't delete file

Dave -- That worked! Thank goodness, I thought I'd have to live with an unwanted folder forever. I'm curious--was what you suggested possible just because I was lucky? What if the names of the files had been even longer; would your suggestion not have worked?! Thanks so much. Sincerely, Zeb

Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?

I think CGF missed one or two, anyway. Plus, there are all those unofficial packages that aren't tracked at all... Igor On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Reid Thompson wrote: > Damn, no listing of the 12?.? > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:43:51PM -0200, Fr?d?ric L. W. Meu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

Thanks Igor. I found the updated .dll on another mirror and it installed fine. Also, thank you for alerting me to the email address quotes. Note that yours doesn't appear below! Barry --- Igor Pechtchanski wrote: > Barry, > > It's also possible you had some Cygwin program (or > service) runnin

cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken

I installed the new 1.5.6-1 and rebooted. I then went to edit a file with vim. I changed one line of code and went to save the file. This is what happened: - vi FA_lib.pm 'Vim: Caught deadly signal SEGV Vim: preserving files... Basically I cannot use Vim to edit files - as it now stands. Used

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:19:25PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:09:41PM -0800, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> wrote: > > + Making IPC::SysV (dynamic) > ... > > +LD_RUN_PATH="" ld2 -L/usr/local/lib SysV.o -o > > ../../.

Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 07:31:14PM -0500, Reid Thompson wrote: >Damn, no listing of the 12?.? Um. I mean, really. It's pretty obvious if you think about it. No, wait. I miscounted. It's only 11. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: ht

Re: cygwin without Win32

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:41:13PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote: >Larry Hall wrote: >>>Has anybody actually measured how many 9x/Me Cygwin users there are >>>compared with NT and greater? >> >>No, not that has been reported to this list anyway. > >I wonder how close to an approximation of reality a s

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:55:53PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote: >So, just out of curiosity, why two ttys for each rxvt? Because you are starting rxvt with CYGWIN=tty. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Docu

Re: Binaries compiled under 1.5.6 don't work with 1.5.5 ?

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:25:35PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: >I think CGF missed one or two, anyway. Plus, there are all those >unofficial packages that aren't tracked at all... Ok. Lets all just agree on 15, then. cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Pr

Re: cygwin without Win32

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:12:25PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>There would certainly be a real detriment in the fact that cygwin >>would stop working for Windows 95/98/Me. If we could focus just on NT >>class systems, there is all sorts of improvements that we could

Re: regtool freezes on XP (Was: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1)

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 01:48:52PM -0800, David Rothenberger wrote: >I think the problem is bash, not regtool. The following script also >displays the problem: > >---begin script--- >#!/bin/sh >ls >---end script--- Does the latest snapshot fix this problem? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http:/

Re: cygwin without Win32

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:12:25PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>There would certainly be a real detriment in the fact that cygwin > >>would stop working for Windows 95/98/Me. If we could focus ju

Re: cygwin without Win32

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 11:21:41PM -0500, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >>On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 04:12:25PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote: >>>Christopher Faylor wrote: There would certainly be a real detriment in the fact that cygwi

Re: cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken

On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 09:39:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I installed the new 1.5.6-1 and rebooted. I then went to edit a file with >vim. I changed one line of code and went to save the file. This is what >happened: > > - vi FA_lib.pm >'Vim: Caught deadly signal SEGV >Vim: preserving file

RE: cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken

>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor >Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 8:37 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken > >And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not a show >stopper.

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: cygwin-1.5.6-1

Christopher Faylor wrote: I've made a new version of the Cygwin DLL and associated utilities available for download. As usual, a list of what has changed is below. - Implement System V shm, sem, msg handling in cygserver. (Corinna Vinschen) - Implement missing POSIX SEM calls sem_open, sem_close

Re: cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: > And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not > a show stopper. Yes, but it's something that will make all screen users not upgrade to 1.5.6 or downgrade to 1.5.5 when they see how broken it's. Broken dettach / reattach is nothing c

Re: cygwin-1.5.6-1 Vim now broken

* Frédéric L. W. Meunier (2004-01-20 06:47 +0100) > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> And, no, screen becoming screwed up in an rxvt session is not >> a show stopper. > > Yes, but it's something that will make all screen users not > upgrade to 1.5.6 or downgrade to 1.5.5 when they