Re: UTF-8 versus utf8

2010-04-03 Thread Tim McDaniel
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010, Andy Koppe wrote: Tim McDaniel: Why does talk all about a charset of UTF-8, then "For a list of locales supported by your Windows machine, use the new locale -a command", which shows "utf8" (which matches my XP machine)? .

Re: UTF-8 versus utf8

2010-04-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Apr 2 16:29, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/02/2010 04:27 PM, Tim McDaniel wrote: > > Why does talk all > > about a charset of UTF-8, then "For a list of locales supported by > > your Windows machine, use the new locale -a command", which shows > >

Re: UTF-8 versus utf8

2010-04-02 Thread Andy Koppe
Tim McDaniel: > Eric Blake: >>> Why does talk >>> all about a charset of UTF-8, then "For a list of locales supported >>> by your Windows machine, use the new locale -a command", which >>> shows "utf8" (which matches my XP machine)? >> >> UTF-8 is

Re: UTF-8 versus utf8

2010-04-02 Thread Tim McDaniel
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010, Eric Blake wrote: On 04/02/2010 04:27 PM, Tim McDaniel wrote: Why does talk all about a charset of UTF-8, then "For a list of locales supported by your Windows machine, use the new locale -a command", which shows "utf8" (wh

Re: UTF-8 versus utf8

2010-04-02 Thread Eric Blake
On 04/02/2010 04:27 PM, Tim McDaniel wrote: > Why does talk all > about a charset of UTF-8, then "For a list of locales supported by > your Windows machine, use the new locale -a command", which shows > "utf8" (which matches my XP machine)? UTF-8

UTF-8 versus utf8

2010-04-02 Thread Tim McDaniel
Why does talk all about a charset of UTF-8, then "For a list of locales supported by your Windows machine, use the new locale -a command", which shows "utf8" (which matches my XP machine)? I know little about charsets, so I find it confusing nad