Re: YA GPL Violation (was Re: Rebase dlls not from cygwin)

2005-06-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 7 08:02, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:47:13AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:29PM +0200, Hermann Klocker wrote: > > > I try to run Dakota 3.3 (from > > > http://endo.sandia.gov/DAKOTA/licensing/release/Dakota_3_3.cygwin.tar.gz) > > AFAIC

YA GPL Violation (was Re: Rebase dlls not from cygwin)

2005-06-07 Thread Jason Tishler
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:47:13AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:29PM +0200, Hermann Klocker wrote: > > I try to run Dakota 3.3 (from > > http://endo.sandia.gov/DAKOTA/licensing/release/Dakota_3_3.cygwin.tar.gz) AFAICT, the above is distributing cygwin1.dll without t

Re: Rebase dlls not from cygwin

2005-06-07 Thread Jason Tishler
Hermann, On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:47:13AM -0400, Jason Tishler wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:29PM +0200, Hermann Klocker wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin > > $ rebaseall -T list1 -v > rb.out > > /usr/bin/tclpip84.dll: skipped because not rebaseable > > /usr/local/bin/mpich.d

Re: Rebase dlls not from cygwin

2005-05-24 Thread ralf . habacker
Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2005 13:47 schrieb Jason Tishler: > Hermann, > > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:29PM +0200, Hermann Klocker wrote: > > Sorry if I email directly to you - I am new to cygwin. Please tell me > > if I should have posted this report to another location. > > I would have preferred

Re: Rebase dlls not from cygwin

2005-05-24 Thread Jason Tishler
Hermann, On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:29PM +0200, Hermann Klocker wrote: > Sorry if I email directly to you - I am new to cygwin. Please tell me > if I should have posted this report to another location. I would have preferred if you posted to the Cygwin mailing list instead of sending private e

Re: Rebase dlls not from cygwin

2005-05-07 Thread Jason Tishler
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 01:00:59AM -0700, Selin 428 wrote: > i have a problem with rebasing dlls not from cygwin. I like the switch > for setting offset so i don't want to use M$ rebase which works for me > but cygwins rebase always writes: > .dll: skipped because not rebaseable > i call it out

Rebase dlls not from cygwin

2005-04-25 Thread Selin 428
Hi, i have a problem with rebasing dlls not from cygwin. I like the switch for setting offset so i don't want to use M$ rebase which works for me but cygwins rebase always writes: .dll: skipped because not rebaseable i call it outside of cygwin, but it writes the message for every dll. Am i doi