Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2005 13:47 schrieb Jason Tishler: > Hermann, > > On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 11:06:29PM +0200, Hermann Klocker wrote: > > Sorry if I email directly to you - I am new to cygwin. Please tell me > > if I should have posted this report to another location. > > I would have preferred if you posted to the Cygwin mailing list instead > of sending private email. > > > I think I have a problem similar to a posting I found regarding rebase > > failing with message "not rebaseable". > > > > I try to run Dakota 3.3 (from > > http://endo.sandia.gov/DAKOTA/licensing/release/Dakota_3_3.cygwin.tar.gz) > > > > with cygwin 1.5.16. > > > > When trying to start Dakota I get the error message > > > > $ dakota > > 1723 [main] ? 5132 cygheap_fixup_in_child: Couldn't reserve 9891792 bytes > > of space for cygwin's heap (0x61810000 <0x15C0000>) in child, Win32 error > > 487 C:\cygwin\usr\local\bin\dakota.exe (5132): *** m.AllocationBase 0x0, > > m.BaseAddre ss 0x61810000, m.RegionSize 0x5B0000, m.State 0x10000
I recognized this type of problems with kde on cygwin too, when dll's are rebased into the address area immediatly above the cygwin1.dll. I fixed this problems using the rebase base address option -b e.g. rebase -b 0x61000000 ... Ralf > > After all I have read about this message I thougt rebase should solve > > my problem, alas trying to rebase all dlls from Dakota (these are the > > only ones residing in /usr/local/bin) gave: > > > > $ cat list1 > > /usr/local/bin/mpich.dll > > /usr/local/bin/mpichd.dll > > /usr/local/bin/mpicherr.dll > > /usr/local/bin/PHXCppApi.dll > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/bin > > $ rebaseall -T list1 -v > rb.out > > /usr/bin/tclpip84.dll: skipped because not rebaseable > > /usr/local/bin/mpich.dll: skipped because not rebaseable > > /usr/local/bin/mpichd.dll: skipped because not rebaseable > > /usr/local/bin/mpicherr.dll: skipped because not rebaseable > > /usr/local/bin/PHXCppApi.dll: skipped because not rebaseable > > > > Do you have any hints regarding this problem? > > At the moment no. However, I was able to reproduce the above. I will > enhance rebase to indicated why it thinks a DLL is not rebaseable when > the verbose option is specified. > > Although this change may produce better diagnostics, it may not solve > your problem. Note that some DLLs are just not rebaseable -- for > example, tclpip84.dll. > > Jason -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
