On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:55 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:
> Well, if there is a filter set up I didn't mean to be insensitive. I
> thought to ask because some work accounts I use get these messages but
> they are properly flagged.
Work accounts generally also deliver the message to a quarantine of
some kind
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 6:59 PM, Norton Allen wrote:
> For what it's worth, I think I have a pretty good spam filter, and these ads
> for mailing lists always seem to get through, so they aren't particularly
> easy to catch.
>
>
Well, if there is a filter set up I didn't mean to be insensitive. I
For what it's worth, I think I have a pretty good spam filter, and these
ads for mailing lists always seem to get through, so they aren't
particularly easy to catch.
On 5/18/2018 5:03 PM, Erik Soderquist wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
There is. It's not perf
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> There is. It's not perfect. Depending on how it's tweaked, either we get
> false positives or some spam makes it through. It goes back and forth and
> right now it seems were on the latter side.
Personally, I much prefer some getting th
On 2018-05-18 14:44, R0b0t1 wrote:
Ideally everyone would have a filter set up that is capable of binning
the spam automatically. Some may not. Is there any chance of running
something listserv side?
There is. It's not perfect. Depending on how it's tweaked, either we
get false positives or
however." is a
bit extreme.
Anyway, thanks for the info.
-Frank
From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com on behalf of Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Sent: Thu 4/29/2010 11:24 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: (nwl) Re: spam score exceeded threshold??
On 4/29/2010 1
On 4/29/2010 11:12 PM, Crow, Frank wrote:
I've been trying to send a question to the Cygwin list and I keep getting:
"Server refused mail at END OF DATA - 552 spam score exceeded threshold
(#5.6.1)"
Can anyone help me figure out why my question results in this? I'm not
spamming! Just asking
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 03:06:46PM -0500, Andrew wrote:
>I did. No response though :-( And again, I doubt the guide is at
>flaw..since every other site has roughly the same instructions.
It's unlikely that every other site tells you to edit cygwin.bat.
If that was really a requirement then we'd d
I did. No response though :-( And again, I doubt the guide is at flaw..since
every other site has roughly the same instructions.
I appreciate your response however.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Hall
(Cygwin)
Sent: Nov
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> I fixed both bugs in CVS. It's rather disappointing that
>
> SetFilePointer (handle, 0, NULL, FILE_END);
>
> fails for files > 4Gigs. It's actually required that the offset_high
> pointer is a valid pointer to a LONG containing 0. Oh well.
Nice catch
On May 29 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> > Somehow, when the file size is huge, cygwin is not properly propogating
> > that
> an
> > O_APPEND bit (0x9 in the flags printed from F_GETFL) means that the initial
> > offset of fd 1 is the end of the file. (And it woul
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes:
> >
> > assert (0 == lseek (open("existing", O_WRONLY | O_APPEND), 0, SEEK_CUR));
>
> Can you give me a pointer?
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/open.html
"The file offset used to mark the current position within the file shall be se
On May 29 15:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
>
> > Somehow, when the file size is huge, cygwin is not properly propogating
> > that
> an
> > O_APPEND bit (0x9 in the flags printed from F_GETFL) means that the initial
> > offset of fd 1 is the end of the file. (And it woul
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> Somehow, when the file size is huge, cygwin is not properly propogating that
an
> O_APPEND bit (0x9 in the flags printed from F_GETFL) means that the initial
> offset of fd 1 is the end of the file. (And it would be nice if strace would
> show the initial lseek
Peter Milne netspeed.com.au> writes:
>
> Hi Eric
>
> Were you able to reproduce the problem I encountered with dd?
Yes - and it looks like there is indeed a cygwin bug, unrelated to my newlib
patch to stdout.
$ cd /tmp
$ dd bs=1 seek=4540030013 if=/dev/zero of=huge count=1
$ ls -l huge blah
Hi Eric
Were you able to reproduce the problem I encountered with dd?
Cheers
Peter
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cyg
Hi Eric
B is 71.8 Mbytes and and according to ls A (actually data.dat) is:
-rw-r--r-- 1 trader None 4540030014 May 26 12:00 data.dat
I'm running the latest version of cygwin. I hope you are able to reproduce
the problem with dd using this information.
Cheers
Peter
-Original Message
-Original Message-
Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 6:34 PM
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Color Schemes
Richard Lynch (Contractor) wrote:
> -Original Message-
> Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 5:13 PM
> Subject: [SPAM] RE: Color Schemes
> [snip]
Eek! Please, PLEASE http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR,
esp
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known as
> > SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem. Perhaps the above
> > link should be amended to clarify this.
>
> No, it'
On Jun 23 18:17, Dave Korn wrote:
> Original Message
> >From: Corinna Vinschen
> >Sent: 23 June 2005 18:10
>
> > On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >> No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known
> >> as SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem
Original Message
>From: Corinna Vinschen
>Sent: 23 June 2005 18:10
> On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known
>> as SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem. Perhaps the above
>> link should be amended t
On Jun 23 12:02, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> No, SYSTEM and LocalSystem are two names for the same user. It's known as
> SYSTEM in Cygwin, but Windows calls it LocalSystem. Perhaps the above
> link should be amended to clarify this.
No, it's know in Windows as SYSTEM. The string "LocalSystem" on
Ugh. Top-posting. Reformatted. BTW, there was no need to Cc: me, I read
the list. Please make sure your mailer respects the Reply-To: header.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Christophe Delarue wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: Thursday,
Thank's for your answer
My server is Ms 2000.
I read the url you gave me (I have allready read). I do not well
understand
the section switching user context
Does the second paragraph "On NT and Windows 2000 the SYSTEM user
has these privileges and can run services such as sshd." says that
I
> Dear Cygwin,
>
> We just sent you an email titled "Please help us with a
> 'make' command error".
> Now we found another problem with cygwin. We just noticed
> that there is no gcc
> compiler in cygwin's directory. We don't know how to move
> forward without gcc.
> Could you please help us
The workaround I'm considering is: to build a list of only the user logon names
we need for /etc/passwd (a fairly small subset of the domain), and then
write a shell script (driven by this list) to repeatedly call
"mkpasswd -l -d -u USERNAMEHERE >> /etc/passwd".
A co-worker speculates that Microso
Hi Tarun,
I havent installed WMaker on CygWin, so wont comment on that. You
should've attached a more descriptive log though.
1. Cygwin install asks you for install for 'All Users'/ only
Administrator. That icon is typically in
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu (or similar
n another function ?
>
> TIA
>
> Neto
> brazil
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Igor Pechtchanski
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
> To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
> Cc: cygwincygwincom
> Subject: RE: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
>
>
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote:
> Ok, but when I try to compile using -mno-cygwin that is not working.
>
> Why?
>
Isn't it obvious? gettimeofday is in Cygwin. You asked for no Cygwin
(ie. mingw). Look at www.mingw.org for details as this is now off topic.
Here come tho
How do I resolve this?
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:30 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues wrote:
> Ok, but when I try to compile using -mno-cygwin that is not working.
^
Hmm, I wonder why...
Igor
> Why?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Ford
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
Neto,
Have you actually tried?
Igor
P.S. Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in
your repli
Ok, but when I try to compile using -mno-cygwin that is not working.
Why?
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:25 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
On W
Neto,
Have you actually tried?
Igor
P.S. Please configure your mailer to not quote raw e-mail addresses in
your replies -- let's not feed the spam harvesters.
P.P.S. He was being sarcastic.
P.P.P.S. Looking at the subject, so were you. :-)
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Hi Brian,
Do you know?
TIA
neto
-Original Message-
From: Brian Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:18 PM
To: Neto, Antonio Jose Rodrigues
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SPAM: Re: gettimeofday() similar function
On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Neto, Antonio Jose Rodr
Dear Rafael,
> There was some memory allocation related funkiness in DBD::Pg that the
> attached patch fixes. You can apply it to both 1.31 and 1.32_1.
>
> Bug posted on CPAN:
> http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=5357
All the tests now pass and everything works perfectly. Thanks very much
for
Your mail has been rejected as spam.
It was NOT received. If your email was not spam,
please send a note to the original destination
letting them know that this happened.
- Thank you.
(Please do not reply to this message, as it will
not arrive at the original destination.)
--
Unsubscribe info
I'd like to thank all who responded to my query. The cygwin1.dll was indeed
used maliciously. I dumped my McAfee and purchased Norton System Works 2003.
It took me a total of 3 days get my infected machine back up and running.
Most of the difficultly came from the fact that the "worm" and its
assoc
Thanks for the response Max.
I tried running regedit. It pops up and then immediately closes itself, the
same thing happens when I attempt to run msconfig.
I found cygwin1.dll in the \windows directory. I also found a new exe -
shiver.exe. A search of the web indicates that this is a trojan.
--
The SPAM filtering tradespace is interesting. A number of weeks ago, Mr.
Faylor indicated he was altering
the filter to reject more SPAM, and that this might lead to some problems
with the list getting some
legitimate mail. At that time, he received some complaints about legitimate
mail being bl
On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 03:04:44PM +0200, Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
>Hi List
>
>Am I the only one who just received a spam mail through this list
>containing Gay video offers ;o)
>
>Can we do anything about the spam mail?
Yes, you can not contribute to the spam by sending messages to mailing
Jacob schrieb:
> Am I the only one who just received a spam mail through this list
> containing Gay video offers ;o)
I'm sure you're not the only one...
> Can we do anything about the spam mail?
http://no.sp.am/
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-
42 matches
Mail list logo
