On Dec 12 11:15, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>
> On Dec 10, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Hi Heath,
> >
> [snip]
>
> > The latest snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots.html contains
> > another patch which should avoid this problem. Can you please test?
> >
>
> Unfortunately, I'
On Dec 10, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Heath,
>
[snip]
> The latest snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots.html contains
> another patch which should avoid this problem. Can you please test?
>
Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to be able to repro the problem. Sorry..
Hi Heath,
On Oct 4 17:27, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>
>
> On 10/1/2010 5:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:52:12AM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
> >>Ugh! spoke too soon. It happened again:
> >>
> >> 1 [main] bash 5112! C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error -
> >>could
On 10/1/2010 5:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:52:12AM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
Ugh! spoke too soon. It happened again:
1 [main] bash 5112! C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error -
could not load C:\Windows\system32\ws2_32.dll, Win32 error 998
Stack trace:
Christopher Faylor sent the following at Friday, October 01, 2010 6:03 PM
>So: How about how?
>
>http://cygwin.com/snapshots.html
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygw
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:52:12AM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>
>
>On 9/27/2010 10:31 AM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>> On 9/24/2010 2:54 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
Well, another difference is the addition of PATH_MAX*2 bytes on the
>>
On 9/27/2010 10:31 AM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
On 9/24/2010 2:54 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
Well, another difference is the addition of PATH_MAX*2 bytes on the
stack. Those functions do some stack manipulations that I'm having
trouble
On 9/24/2010 2:54 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
Well, another difference is the addition of PATH_MAX*2 bytes on the
stack. Those functions do some stack manipulations that I'm having
trouble grokking. Does 'ret' need to be topmost on
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>
>On 9/24/2010 11:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Sep 24 11:31, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>>> The path is correct. I have no explanation why changing from a
>>> filename to a pathname (and LoadLibrary to LoadLibraryW) would make
>>> any di
On 9/24/2010 11:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Sep 24 11:31, Heath Kehoe wrote:
The path is correct. I have no explanation why changing from a
filename to a pathname (and LoadLibrary to LoadLibraryW) would make
any difference, unless there's a race condition, say if
LoadLibrary[W] is a bit f
On Sep 24 11:31, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>
> On 9/24/2010 4:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >
> >Can you revert to the latest from CVS and try again with this patch applied:
> >
> >Index: autoload.cc
> >===
> >RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsu
On 9/24/2010 4:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Can you revert to the latest from CVS and try again with this patch applied:
Index: autoload.cc
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/winsup/cygwin/autoload.cc,v
retrieving revision 1.174
diff -u
On Sep 23 18:22, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>
> On 9/23/2010 3:07 PM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
> >On 9/23/2010 12:13 PM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
> >>I have a build system that uses rake under cygwin, and every so often
> >>a build tool will crash on invocation:
> >>
> >> 1 [main] bclanc 1576! C:\budcat\t
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:11:09PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:13:42PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
>> I have a build system that uses rake under cygwin, and every so often
>>a build tool will crash on invocation:
>>
>> 1 [main] bclanc 1576! C:\budcat\tools\bin
On 9/23/2010 3:07 PM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
On 9/23/2010 12:13 PM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
I have a build system that uses rake under cygwin, and every so often
a build tool will crash on invocation:
1 [main] bclanc 1576! C:\budcat\tools\bin\bclanc.exe: *** fatal
error - could not load w,
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:13:42PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
> I have a build system that uses rake under cygwin, and every so often
>a build tool will crash on invocation:
>
> 1 [main] bclanc 1576! C:\budcat\tools\bin\bclanc.exe: *** fatal
>error - could not load w, Win32 error 998
>Stack
On 9/23/2010 12:13 PM, Heath Kehoe wrote:
I have a build system that uses rake under cygwin, and every so often
a build tool will crash on invocation:
1 [main] bclanc 1576! C:\budcat\tools\bin\bclanc.exe: *** fatal
error - could not load w, Win32 error 998
Stack trace:
Frame Func
17 matches
Mail list logo