On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote: > >On 9/24/2010 11:57 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> On Sep 24 11:31, Heath Kehoe wrote: >>> The path is correct. I have no explanation why changing from a >>> filename to a pathname (and LoadLibrary to LoadLibraryW) would make >>> any difference, unless there's a race condition, say if >>> LoadLibrary[W] is a bit faster when you give it a full path. >> That doesn't make sense. It's the LoadLibraryW call itself which is >> failing with error 998, "Invalid access to memory location". >> >> Hmm. Puzzeling. >> > >Well, another difference is the addition of PATH_MAX*2 bytes on the >stack. Those functions do some stack manipulations that I'm having >trouble grokking. Does 'ret' need to be topmost on the stack? > >As a test, I moved the 'ret' definition after that of 'dll_path' (in >std_dll_init). So far with that change, I have not seen the LoadLibrary >fatal error, though I need to test it more to be sure.
I've moved some other stuff around in that function. Could you try the latest CVS? cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
