On 9/24/2010 2:54 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 01:23:48PM -0500, Heath Kehoe wrote:
Well, another difference is the addition of PATH_MAX*2 bytes on the
stack. Those functions do some stack manipulations that I'm having
trouble grokking. Does 'ret' need to be topmost on the stack?
As a test, I moved the 'ret' definition after that of 'dll_path' (in
std_dll_init). So far with that change, I have not seen the LoadLibrary
fatal error, though I need to test it more to be sure.
I've moved some other stuff around in that function. Could you try
the latest CVS?
cgf
With your changes, I have not yet encountered any of the error 998
failures, and I've run a couple of rebuilds of my project as a stress-test.
Thanks,
-h
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
