Greetings, Steven Penny!
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:18:59, Frank Farance wrote:
>> No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if
>> one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some
>> kinda registration/subscription system is necessary.
> No,
On 06/05/2018 07:18 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
Someone suggested a moderator (or multiple moderators) that would
approve messages from outsiders. That sounds like the easiest approach
because it anyone can write to the list and there would be just a short
delay for those people who aren't subscr
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 20:18:59, Frank Farance wrote:
No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if
one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some
kinda registration/subscription system is necessary.
No, its not? did not you read my post? i
On 2018-06-05 20:04, Steven Penny wrote:
[...]
If OP is suggesting people can only reply if they are subscribed, then I am not
a fan of that.
No, I'm not suggesting that one must be subscribed, I'm pointing out that if
one wants to have a back and forth discussion (in a practical sense), some
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018 13:38:14, Erik Soderquist wrote:
I have seen many people (and have done this myself before I
subscribed) participate in the discussion of their specific topic on
the list without subscribing by watching the public archive of the
list for updates to their topics and crafting the
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 4:13 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
> Third, I believe a registration mechanism (just your E-mail address) is
> necessary for discussion: How would you be getting follow-up messages if
> you're not on the list? And E-mail clients may prefer Reply-To-List rather
> than Reply-All, w
On 6/4/2018 5:54 PM, Duncan Roe wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>>
>> My mail servers regularly categorize cygwin at cygwin.com mail as spam.
>>
>> And then there is all of the mail that simply gets rejected because of
>> DMARC policies applied by the sender
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 04:26:57PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> My mail servers regularly categorize cygwin at cygwin.com mail as spam.
>
> And then there is all of the mail that simply gets rejected because of
> DMARC policies applied by the sender's domain.
>
>
> There are other alternatives.
On 6/4/2018 4:13 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
> Second, as a mailing list admin myself, at some time we're going to have
> to deal with spam as some of the members E-mail systems will start
> tagging normal cygwin stuff as spam, which is the kind of stuff members
> don't have control over in medium-to-
> On Jun 4, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Frank Farance wrote:
>
> I've seen a bunch of spam, and it's continued for a while (beyond my
> expectation that it would have already ended).
Fortunately, no one's here to meet your expectations.
If you have issues with the lists, you should take to the right pla
On 2018-06-04 15:47, James Darnley wrote:
It isn't very nice to put "please email cygwin@cygwin.com" in error and warning messages
then deny people the opportunity to send the email. "Please register first" is annoying
as shit. I have certainly not reported bugs to lists that make me do that.
On 2018-06-04 21:30, Frank Farance wrote:
> Hi, I enjoy reading the cygwin E-mails, one of the few E-mail lists I
> regularly follow. And I've administered multiple E-mail lists over
> two-plus decades.
>
> I've seen a bunch of spam, and it's continued for a while (beyond my
> expectation that it
12 matches
Mail list logo
