Re: Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage

2015-07-24 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 21/07/2015 15:36, Mouse wrote: In FAQ item 1.9, [...] Surely those list addresses shouldn't _all_ be the same...? This piece of text obviously doesn't make much sense after the search-and-replace which happened when the cygwin-xfree list was deprecated. Ah! I wondered how that had happened

Re: Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage

2015-07-21 Thread David Stacey
On 20/07/15 20:14, Mouse wrote: The question does not specify a jurisdiction; that XWin is not a relevant trademark in the USA does not mean it's not elsewhere. (While I'm not aware of any where it is, I haven't gone looking. I did a quick search, and turned up one trademark of Xwin [1] (note

Re: Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage

2015-07-21 Thread Mouse
> This is the correct place to report such issues. Good; always nice to get confirmation I guessed right. :-) >> In FAQ item 1.9, [...] >> Surely those list addresses shouldn't _all_ be the same...? > This piece of text obviously doesn't make much sense after the > search-and-replace which happen

Re: Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage

2015-07-21 Thread Jon TURNEY
On 20/07/2015 20:14, Mouse wrote: I happened to be looking at http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html and I noticed some oddities which might call for fixing. This is the only place I could find for reporting such issues, though of course it's entirely possible This is the correct place

Minor issues with Cygwin/X FAQ webpage

2015-07-20 Thread Mouse
I happened to be looking at http://x.cygwin.com/docs/faq/cygwin-x-faq.html and I noticed some oddities which might call for fixing. This is the only place I could find for reporting such issues, though of course it's entirely possible I missed something; FAQ item 1.9 makes me think there should be