> This is the correct place to report such issues.
Good; always nice to get confirmation I guessed right. :-)
>> In FAQ item 1.9, [...]
>> Surely those list addresses shouldn't _all_ be the same...?
> This piece of text obviously doesn't make much sense after the
> search-and-replace which happened when the cygwin-xfree list was
> deprecated.
Ah! I wondered how that had happened. Makes perfect sense now.
Though, I do note, the new wording makes it sound as though cygwin@ is
specifically for Cygwin/X, rather than all of Cygwin. As a strawman
for a fix, how about
Not for Cygwin/X specifically, but Cygwin/X traffic is
appropriate for the main Cygwin list at cygwin@....
>> 12.8. Isn't "XWin" trademarked by StarNet Communications?
>> No. A quick search at the United States Patent and Trademark
>> Office for "XWin" [...]
>> The question does not specify a jurisdiction; [...]
> I don't know why this is in the FAQ. It seems to record the
> discussion at [1].
It does, it does indeed. I did a few searches against the archives,
but must have missed the search terms which would have turned up that
one. (Not surprising; my search-fu is quite weak.)
> How would you suggest rewriting this?
It could be as simple as changing the answer to something like
Not in the USA, at least; a quick search at...
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mo...@rodents-montreal.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
