Re: It does involve cygwin

I can't imagine any one actually working in the real world even caring about any of this. I joined this mailing list a couple of days ago. I thought it would be interesting ... but this ... it's just painful. On 4 Apr 2013, at 10:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 0

Re: It does involve cygwin

On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:37:11PM +0900, wynfi...@gmail.com wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:01PM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote: >> >On 4/4/2013 2:40 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: >> snipped >> If you have to enter MinGW land to perform what the OP wants then that >> is a r

It does involve cygwin (last message hopefully)

Comments inlined. Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:01PM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote: > >On 4/4/2013 2:40 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: > snipped > If you have to enter MinGW land to perform what the OP wants then that > is a really clear indication that this is off-topic. That i

It does involve cygwin

Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:01PM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote: > >On 4/4/2013 2:40 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: > snipped > If you have to enter MinGW land to perform what the OP wants then that > is a really clear indication that this is off-topic. That is illogical, just b