I can't imagine any one actually working in the real world even caring about any of this. I joined this mailing list a couple of days ago. I thought it would be interesting ... but this ... it's just painful. On 4 Apr 2013, at 10:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:37:11PM +0900, wynfi...@gmail.com wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:01PM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote: >>>> On 4/4/2013 2:40 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: >>> ....snipped >>> If you have to enter MinGW land to perform what the OP wants then that >>> is a really clear indication that this is off-topic. >> >> That is illogical, just because the very good advice above explains a >> method of how it could be done using another system, does not make it >> irrelavant to cygwin. That's like saying compiling can be done with >> Microsoft C, so gcc is not relevant to cygwin. > > Perhaps you should read the description of what is on-topic for this > list at http://cygwin.com/lists.html . > >>> I think we've seen an adequate amount of advice for how the OP can >>> proceed. There was a suggestion that one could look at the disassembled >>> output from gcc to see how it does things. That's probably the best >>> advice for how to proceed, regardless of the platform. >> >> Does this mean that you'll honor your word and take it off line to >> answer practical questions regarding this issue? > > Now you're sounding delusional. > > Please stop this. First and only warning. > > cgf > > -- > Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
