On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 02:37:11PM +0900, wynfi...@gmail.com wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 02:59:01PM -0400, Eliot Moss wrote: >> >On 4/4/2013 2:40 PM, Eliot Moss wrote: >> ....snipped >> If you have to enter MinGW land to perform what the OP wants then that >> is a really clear indication that this is off-topic. > >That is illogical, just because the very good advice above explains a >method of how it could be done using another system, does not make it >irrelavant to cygwin. That's like saying compiling can be done with >Microsoft C, so gcc is not relevant to cygwin.
Perhaps you should read the description of what is on-topic for this list at http://cygwin.com/lists.html . >> I think we've seen an adequate amount of advice for how the OP can >> proceed. There was a suggestion that one could look at the disassembled >> output from gcc to see how it does things. That's probably the best >> advice for how to proceed, regardless of the platform. > >Does this mean that you'll honor your word and take it off line to >answer practical questions regarding this issue? Now you're sounding delusional. Please stop this. First and only warning. cgf -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
