Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:50:18PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
J. Johnston wrote:
Wayne Hayes wrote:
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down float scannin
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:50:18PM -0500, J. Johnston wrote:
>J. Johnston wrote:
>>Wayne Hayes wrote:
>>
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down float scanning in sscanf
J. Johnston wrote:
Wayne Hayes wrote:
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20?
Thanks! Just to be pedentic, I realized that it's worse
Wayne Hayes wrote:
Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20?
Thanks! Just to be pedentic, I realized that it's worse than a factor of 20.
>Since scanf and the floating point arithmetic is implemented in newlib,
>I've redirected this message there. Does anybody have an idea, what
>could slow down float scanning in sscanf by a factor of 20?
Thanks! Just to be pedentic, I realized that it's worse than a factor of 20.
My *entire simul
e: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 09:54:31 -0500
> From: Wayne Hayes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Cygwin-1.5.5 sscanf on floats: 20 times slower than 2 years ago
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello. Until recently I was running W2k with an ancient version of
> cygwin; I don't kno
Hello. Until recently I was running W2k with an ancient version of
cygwin; I don't know what version it was, but if anybody cares I've
put a copy of cygwin1.dll (dated 2001-May-20) at
http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~wayne/tmp/cygwin1-old.dll.gz
It worked fine on W2k for the past 2.5 years.
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
