; To: cygwin
>> Subject: Re: Missing Dependency
>>
>> On Aug 11 13:56, Karl M wrote:
>>> Hi All...
>>>
>>>
>>> I just did two 32 bit Cygwin + OpenSSH installs on brand new machines
>>> (Win 64), and received an error message that cyggmp3.dll
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:08:48 +0200
> From: corinna-cygwin
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: Missing Dependency
>
> On Aug 11 13:56, Karl M wrote:
>> Hi All...
>>
>>
>> I just did two 32 bit Cygwin + OpenSSH insta
Hi All...
I just did two 32 bit Cygwin + OpenSSH installs on brand new machines (Win 64),
and received an error message that cyggmp3.dll could not be found. I installed
libgmp3 and that resolved the issue.
Thanks,
...Karl
--
Problem reports:
> Subject: RE: OpenSSH port forwarding bug
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:11:03 -0800
>
>> Subject: RE: OpenSSH port forwarding bug
>> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:48:53 -0800
>>
>> Hi Andrew...
>>
>> This is what I usually use in a proxycommand. So the example localized
>> it to just one layer. You can
> Subject: RE: OpenSSH port forwarding bug
> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 12:48:53 -0800
>
> Hi Andrew...
>
> This is what I usually use in a proxycommand. So the example localized
> it to just one layer. You can see that it connects to an ssh server and
> then drops when I fail to complete the ha
Hi All...
The following example shows the port forwarding problem.
~
$ ssh raven -W coyote:22
getsockname failed: Bad file descriptor
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.5
Protocol mismatch.
~
$ ssh raven nc coyote 22
SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.5
Protocol mismatch.
This is the latest version of everything on a win7-6
Hi All...
With the latest update to VI (and the latest Cygwin (1.7.20), I get the
following error starting VI.
$ vi config
Error detected while processing /usr/share/vim/vim73/colors/elflord.vim:
line 12:
E319: Sorry, the command is not available in this version: let g:colors_name =
"elflord"
> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 04:07:57 +0400
> From: anrdaemon
> To: ross; cygwin
> Subject: Re: cygwin port forwarding
>
> Greetings, Ross Boylan!
>
> > Can non-cygwin applications "see" the ports ssh in cygwin sets up for
> > forwarding? I did some tests on Windows 7 and found that, although the
> >
Hi All...
With all of the recent bug fixes, could we have a new release once all the dust
settles.
Thanks,
...Karl
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://c
> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 20:15:50 +0200
> Subject: Re: ACLs restore mismatch, especially with Rsync
> From: az9901
> To: cygwin
>
> Regarding a native backup / restore tool for ACLs, would you have any advice ?
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ben
>
Take a look at SetACL.
> Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 10:55:56 +0200
> From: corinna
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: OpenSSH using root for the .ssh directory?
>
> If you run mkpasswd with the -c option to generate an entry for the
> current user, and if $HOME is set at the time, then mkpasswd misses to
> print the value of $HOM
On Apr 5 14:25, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 5 05:19, Karl M wrote:
> > > > + ls -al /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > > -rw-rw 1 Administrators root 1675 Apr 4 11:30 /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
> > > >
> > > > This test was on a fresh (1.7.12) f
> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 11:46:07 +0200
> From: corinna
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: chmod problem
>
> On Apr 4 13:16, Karl M wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi All...
> >
> >
> > On a recent Cygwin install on a new win7-64 machine, I ran into a pro
Hi All...
On a recent Cygwin install on a new win7-64 machine, I ran into a problem. The
ssh service would not start because the protection on the /etc/ssh_host_rsa_key
was too weak. (I use only the rsa host key.)
If I chmod the file to 600, all is well. But...if I do it within a shell
scr
On Mar 27 09:35, Karl M wrote:
>
>
>
> > Can it at least complain about in-use files?
>
> It does in the setup.log output. Other than that, it can't since it
> has no window to do output to.
>
>
> But setup will still alert the user about running cy
> Can it at least complain about in-use files?
It does in the setup.log output. Other than that, it can't since it
has no window to do output to.
But setup will still alert the user about running cygwin processes, true?
Thanks,
...Karl
--
On Mar 27 11:18, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> The problem
> right now -- at least in my naive invocations -- is that rebaseall
> attempts to rebase things which are in-use. Perhaps the initial
> in-sync-ness check opens the file in exclusive mode and fails? I
> know the in-use files were still in sync
>P.S. What to do next? cgf has already received so many gold stars...
I don't need a gold star. Just doing my job Ma'am...He tips his hat and walkes
off into the sunset and the music starts to play.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/
>P.S. What to do next? cgf has already received so many gold stars...
I don't need a gold star. Just doing my job...
^ Ma'am
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygw
On Mar 4 21:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Mar 4 10:00, Karl M wrote:
> > Here is an strace in case that helps. I used setup to reinstall
> > everything (selected reinstall for each item) and I still have the
> > problem.
>
> Does the agent run? From the strace it
Hi All...
On a system I have, which has not been updated to 1.7.11 (or a snapshot)
I get the following when I type
$ ssh-add -l
Could not open a connection to your authentication agent.
$ uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1-WOW64 Coyote 1.7.9(0.237/5/3) 2011-03-29 10:10 i686 Cygwin
in the case
> Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 21:59:23 -0400
> From: moss
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: admin privileges when logging in by ssh?
>
> On 9/11/2011 9:07 PM, Andrew Schulman wrote:
> >>> When a user with administrative privileges logs in to sshd, it seems that
> >>> the user is only granted
> >>> standard
> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:10:28 +0200
> From: corinna
> Subject: Who's using "CYGWIN=tty" and why?
>
> Hi,
>
> Chris and I are wondering how many people are using the Windows console
> as local console window in CYGWIN=tty mode and why.
>
> Here's why we ask:
>
> We are both not sure why anybody
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:58:10 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: NT4?
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:47:43PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
> >
> >At some point, would there be any (significant) performance advantage to
> >moving (some of the) platform differences to com
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:34:16 +0200
> From: corinna-cygwin
> Subject: NT4?
>
> Is anybody here still using Cygwin on Windows NT4 on a daily basis? I'm
> asking because we're planning to drop NT4 support entirely and I would
> like to know if there are lots of people who would be very sad if th
> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:49:42 +
> From: dave.korn
> Subject: Re: cyggfortran-3.dll broken ?
>
> On 23/03/2011 17:31, Charles Wilson wrote:
>
> > Err...no, I don't think so. Symbol forwarding is actually implemented
> > as part of the PE-I386 spec, so it resides in the forwardING dll its
> Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 10:25:12 -0500
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: snapshots revisited
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 09:20:12AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 10 18:25, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 06:24:24PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >On Thu, Mar 10,
> From: BBuchbinder
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 18:49:29 -0500
> Subject: RE: New Cygwin release
>
> Karl M sent the following at Tuesday, March 08, 2011 4:57 PM
> >Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug
> >fixes settles down and before signifi
Hi All...
Is another Cygwin release planned for after the current round of bug fixes
settles down and before significant new development starts again?
Thanks,
...Karl
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:16:11 +0100
> From: corinna
> Subject: Re: Please test latest developer snapshot
>
> On Feb 24 09:56, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
> > On 17 February 2011 07:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > Apart from your testing and our fixing of
> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:19:20 -0700
> From: eblake
> Subject: Re: Coreutils' Build Fails After Linking rm.exe
>
> Hmm. Does your $PATH include '.' somewhere near the beginning? That
> may be the culprit; I _never_ run with '.' at the beginning (too much
> risk of a trojan horse executable taki
> Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:20:08 +0100
> From: Thomas
> Subject: Re: Please upload: mined-2000.16-0
>
> Am 13.02.2011 23:25, schrieb Karl M:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:18:18 +0100
> >> From: Thomas
> >> Subject: Re:
> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:18:18 +0100
> From: Thomas
> Subject: Re: Please upload: mined-2000.16-0
> > The reason is that, at least on Windows 7, there is no key called
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Classes\SystemFileAssociations.
> >
> > The result is that a user of Windows 7 gets a postin
> Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:56:37 -0400
> From: daniel
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: Windows-style pathname does not work as command - why?
>
>
> Not yet. Cygpath certainly supports Windows-style paths. Are you
> claiming that places like that are the only place that it is "accepted"
> to use Windows
> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:39:09 -0400
> From: cgf
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: Windows-style pathname does not work as command - why?
>
> Isn't the whole reason for Cygwin actually to enable doing Unixy things
> in Windows (that is, providing Windows/Unix interoperablity?
> >>>
> >>> No,
> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 07:08:58 +0100
> Subject: Re: How/Where do I get an older version of Cygwin?
> From: andy
> To: cygwin
>
> I'd recommend against using the "Prev" button. It gives you a rather
> random collection of old packages, where some are years older than the
> current one and others
> From: dan.colascione
> Subject: Pipe creation failure (win32 error 1) again -- not BLODA
> Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2010 11:46:16 -0700
>
> I'm running into sporadic failures with pipe creation; the exact errors
> (from a service logfile) are:
>
> 0 [sig] grep
> Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:00:50 -0400
> From: reply-to-list-only-lh
> Subject: Re: PCYMTNQREAIYR Re: Setup.exe update confusion
>
> On 8/5/2010 1:26 PM, Steven Collins wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:13, DePriest, Jason R.<> wrote:
>
>
>
> >> In Gm
> Subject: Re: cygport cross-compiling beta1
> From: yselkowitz
> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 03:21:44 -0500
>
>> But...somebody out there might have (cygwin) code that doesn't compile
>> with gcc4. They ought to fix their code, but...this is not an ideal world.
>
> Distros maintain patches for still
> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 12:29:11 +0100
> From: dave
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: How to uninstall Cygwin/X (only)
>
> On 11/04/2010 07:26, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> But the thing is, I'm not sure that just adding a drop-down is a useful
>> thing to do.
>
> Well, I am. The problem describe
> Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 20:01:47 -0400
> From: cgf
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Re: cygintl-8.dll was not found
>
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:43:06PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>If you wish to propose design changes to setup, then please identify
>>particular behaviors tha
> Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 00:38:04 +0300
> Subject: Re: cygintl-8.dll was not found
> From: fromblewit
> To: cygwin
>
> What you can't get your head round is that I'm talking about design,
> and you're talking about bugs. The setup program may work as designed
> (and I'm not sure it does), but the d
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 21:23:22 -0500
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: ssh + patch + $TMP
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 12:04:19AM +0100, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>
> I would really bet that there aren't many programs out there which rely
> on those environment variables. Just asserting that this is neede
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:15:33 -0500
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: "mbox note: Can't open file://L:\ods\rtoy\Cygnus/ for reading:
> Unrecognisable file format" errors whilst executing setup.exe
>
> Is there an echo in here?
>
>>>There is a new version of setup.exe and setup-legacy.exe on cygwin.c
> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:03:57 -0500
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: "mbox note: Can't open file://L:\ods\rtoy\Cygnus/ for reading:
> Unrecognisable file format" errors whilst executing setup.exe
>
> There is a new version of setup.exe and setup-legacy.exe on cygwin.com
> now. Please let me know i
> From: don
> To: cygwin
> Subject: Why require ps -W and kill -f
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:09:03 -0800
>
> ps -e on Unix displays “every process running on the system”. This command
> doesn't do that under cygwin. Why should it be necessary to supply -W to
> see all processes running on the s
> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:48:34 +0100
> From: corinna
> Subject: Re: Tried out cygwin-inst-20100111.tar.bz2
>
> On Jan 11 22:39, Karl M wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All...
>>
>> I just tried out the latest snapshot and had two problems on a Vista
>> Bus
Hi All...
I just tried out the latest snapshot and had two problems on a Vista Business
SP2 machine.
The first problem was that in bash shell launched from the cygwin.bat file in a
console
window, the backspace did nothing.
I also received the following error from find:
$ find / -name '
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:45:28 +
> From: gchicares
> Subject: Re: "mount -a" has no effect on the cygdrive prefix
>
> On 2010-01-11 16:16Z, Karl M wrote:
>>
>> I just reviewed chapter 3 of the user guide and found no mention of posix=0
>
> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:15:29 +0100
> From: corinna
> Subject: Re: "mount -a" has no effect on the cygdrive prefix
>
> On Dec 30 12:46, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Dec 29 16:27, Karl M wrote:
>>>> From: corinna-cygwin
>>>> The cygdr
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:10:47 +0100
> From: corinna-cygwin
> Subject: Re: "mount -a" has no effect on the cygdrive prefix
>
> On Dec 23 08:32, Karl M wrote:
>> Hi All...
>>
>> With the last 1.7.0 version and with a clean 1.7.1 install on an XP Pr
Hi All...
With the last 1.7.0 version and with a clean 1.7.1 install on an XP Pro SP3
machine,
if I edit my fstab to change my cygdrive prefix and then do a "mount -a", my
mounts
as shown by the mount command or catting mtab are not updated. I only tried it
with
the cygdrive prefix, not with
> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:46:12 -0800
> Subject: Suggestion: Have setup.exe warn before upgrading 'cgywin' package
> itself
>
>
> Currently when upgrading the base 'cygwin' package, the installer only warns
> you midway through the installation after some files have been
> removed/replaced.
>
<20091102203348.gc6...@calimero.vinschen.de>
<4aef5b7c.90...@cygwin.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Mon=2C 2 Nov 2009 17:21:48 -0500
> From: Larry Hall
> Subject: Re: Shall dlopen("foo") succeeed if
<2bf229d30910081120q384b329fs7e24b560bf721...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
> Date: Thu=2C 8 Oct 2009 14:20:33 -0400
> Subject: Re: Many Cygwin (mintty) windows - How to close all?
> From: Chris
> T
> From: news
> Subject: Many Cygwin (mintty) windows - How to close all?
> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 11:05:16 -0500
>
> Is there some sort of Cygwin command that -
> 1. Closes all Mintty windows
> 2. Unloads services - such as cron
> 3. Exits X server
>
> in short, gets rid of all Cygwin processes so
> Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 16:40:15 -0400
> From: lh
> Subject: Re: completely uninstall cygwin
>
>> has anyone created an automated procedure that will
>> completely remove cygwin?
>
> Not that I'm aware of.
>
I believe Microsoft has. :-)
But a complete reinstall of your flavor of Windows may be
butes that differ from the default.
=20
Thanks=2C
=20
...Karl
=20
> Date: Fri=2C 25 Sep 2009 19:19:09 +0200
> From: corinna
> Subject: Re: minor mount issue in 1.7
>
> On Sep 25 08:27=2C Karl M wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi All...
>>
>> Typing "mount -m
Hi All...
Typing "mount -m" displays
$ mount -m
none / cygdrive text,exec,noacl,posix=0 0 0
even though posix=0 is the default, derived from fstab
$ cat /etc/fstab
none / cygdrive text,exec,noacl 0 0
Thanks,
...Karl
> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 19:40:41 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
>
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 01:18:16PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>
>>> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:14:01 -0400
>>> From: cgf
>>> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7 ssh an
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:14:01 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:05:58PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>My first email had a cygcheck and the following steps to reproduce the
>>symptoms.
>>
>>I just not
> Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 10:14:01 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:05:58PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>My first email had a cygcheck and the following steps to reproduce the
>>symptoms.
>>
>>I just not
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:08:57 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: FW: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:07:29PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi All...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just verified,
> From: thorsten
> Subject: RE: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:40:12 +0200
>
> * Karl M (Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:14:59 -0700)
>>> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:07:29PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>>>> I just verified, this does no happen wi
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:08:57 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: FW: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
>
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 09:07:29PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi All...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I just verified, this d
>
> Hi All...
>
>
>
> I just verified, this does no happen with Cygwin 1.5.
>
>
>
> I'll bet B20 was even better.
>
>
>
> It also still happens with the 8/24 snapshot dll.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> ...Karl
>
>
>
>> From: karl
>> Subject: Cygwin 1.7 ssh and window size
>> Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:34
Hi All...
I just noticed the following with Cygwin 1.7, and ssh (and vi in this example),
on Vista Business SP2.
If I (1) open a bash cygwin window from the normal installed shortcut (cmd.exe).
(2) drag the bottom edge of the window down to enlarge it.
(3) ssh localhost (or to another hos
> Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:13:34 +0800
> Subject: Re: flex package requires m4
> From: bambo
>
> There's a package named m4. You should install it.
>
I have done so, and everything worked fine after that. I thank you for the
response. My point was that
Hi All...
I just tried to use mlcscope on cygwin 1.7 but it hung at 100% cpu building the
data base. So I decided to download and build cscope 15.7a. It builds OOTB, but
along the way, I noticed that flex depends on m4, but cygwin-setup does not
know that.
Thanks,
...Karl
Hi All...
When I run setup to the point that it goes to full screen and then use the back
button to go back and select another repository, it stays in full screen mode
and never goes back to a smaller size. I can reduce the size manually, but it
does not happen automatically.
Thanks,
...K
> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:02:48 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: MVFS results
>
>
> I always just use the toggle switches on the front panel of my computer.
>
> Much easier.
>
> cgf
>
Do you prefer a pin or a bent paperclip to poke new holes in the paper tape?
...Karl
_
Hi All...
I just noticed while looking around after updating dash that "ls /bin/*sh" does
not find bash and dash, but it does on my Fedora core 6 machine at work. I see
the issue in both 1.5 and 1.7, attached is an example in cygwin 1.7.
Thanks,
...Karl
_
Hi All...
I'm just wondering what remains on peoples' checklists that has to happen
before Cygwun 1.7 leaves Betaville.
Thanks,
...Karl
_
Windows Live™ Photos: it's easy to store and manage your photos online. See how.
http://w
> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 14:50:49 -0600
> From: warren
> Subject: Re: Installed Cygwin 1.7 - no X?
>
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> (who wonders if he should make good on this threat to merge the
>> cygwin-xfree and cygwin mailing lists)
>
> I thought that was a done deal, just waiting on someon
> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 06:19:55 -0600
> From: Eric Blake
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: readline-6.0.3-2,
> libreadline7-6.0.3-2
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> According to Eric Blake on 7/6/2009 6:14 AM:
>> A new release 6.0.3-2 for readline and libreadlin
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 22:50:28 +0300
> Subject: To boost maintainer
> From: Eray Ozkural
>
> No, you have not done adequate testing obviously.
>
> I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with
> cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work.
>
> Stop g
> From: matthias meyer
> Subject: RE: Cygwin OpenSSH and Windows 7 RC
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 21:53:34 +0200
>
>
> No, thats not what I am doing.
> I install cygwin in XP and build a new setup.exe (with Inno Setup) bundled
> with own programs.
> This setup.exe is installable and run well within X
> From: gds
> Subject: Re: Slow/sluggish response ("system" task at 50%)
> Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:55:25 -0400
>
> Current version 1.5 is slow while beta-1.7 is
> fast, for still unknown reasons.
>
Perhaps 1.7 will challenge the performance of B.20.
:-)
...Karl
___
> Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:40:16 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated setup-1.7.exe (2.629)
>
>
> I wrote a program in SNOBOL to do this! It is awesome!
>
Is SNOBOL still around? Are you really that old too? It was a fun language.
:-)
...Karl
_
> Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:09:34 -0500
> From: yselkowitz
> Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] [1.7] Updated: curl-7.19.4-1 (SECURITY)
>
> I have updated curl to 7.19.4 for Cygwin 1.7. In addition to taking
> advantage of the new capabilities of 1.7 (including IPv6), this update
> includes a fix for CVE-200
> Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:29:14 -0400
> From: l1ee057
> Subject: 1.7: Version info about Cygwin
>
> Can someone explain the difference in version info between?:
>
> * cygcheck -c cygwin
> * uname -a
>
> To wit:
>
> Cygwin Package Information
> Package Version Status
> cygwin 1.7.0-49 OK
> ---
http://www.neophob.com/serendipity/
Hi All...
I just ran across this site and didn't find any source code offered.
Is this a known site?
Thanks,
...Karl
_
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.
Hi All...
The other day, someone posted about an occasional "first time of the day" hang
when sshing into a Cygwin box. I commented that I had not seen the problem with
Cygwin 1.7 on the server host.
I just had a hang from a fast Vista machine to a slow XP laptop, both running
Cygwin 1.7 (w
> Subject: ssh from linux randomly hangs
> From: ekingen
> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:28:42 -0400
>
> Excuse me if this is a repeat question, I can't find it on internet .
> Sometimes ssh from suse linux to cygwin hangs, usually first time in the
> morning, I need to kill client ssh then all day it
> Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:56:03 -0400
> From: kbrown
> Subject: Re: Upgrade to cygwin 1.7 seemed to trash bash profile, path
>
> On 5/28/2009 7:03 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> I'm not really following this discussion closely but there should not,
>> by default, be any entries for /usr/lib or
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 21:26:36 -0600
> Subject: Re: Upgrade to cygwin 1.7 seemed to trash bash profile, path
> From: alfvaen
>
>>> You seem to be missing '/usr/bin' and '/usr/lib'. There was talk about
>>> some of this changing though in my up-to-date installation, I still have
>>> them so I'm
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:29:15 -0400
> From: lh
> Subject: Re: Upgrade to cygwin 1.7 seemed to trash bash profile, path
>
> Aaron Humphrey wrote:
>> I've been having some intermittent problems lately with screen
>> hanging, when it hasn't before. This is on my home computer, which
>> was still
h Cygwin-1.7.0 20090518
>> snapshot
>>
>> Karl M wrote:
>
> If I type
>
> ls -al /c/Cygwin/bin
>
> the exe files are all listed with rw--- instead of rwx-- as I would
> expect
> from the documentation.
>
So is this description current, or does it
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:17:41 -0400
> From: lh
> Subject: Re: file execute access with noacl mount with Cygwin-1.7.0 20090518
> snapshot
>
> Karl M wrote:
>> Attatched is a cygcheck and my fstab.
>>
>> I prefer using windows permissions on my windows (outs
> Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:27:50 -0400
> From: lh
> Subject: Re: file execute access with noacl mount with Cygwin-1.7.0 20090518
> snapshot
>
> Karl M wrote:
>> Karl M wrote:
>>> Hi All...
>>>
>>> I just tried executing a file on my desktop as
> From:
> Subject: file execute access with noacl mount with Cygwin-1.7.0 20090518
> snapshot
> Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:59:20 -0700
>
>
> Hi All...
>
> I just tried executing a file on my desktop as /c/Users/me/Desktop/file.exe
> in Vista Business SP1.
>
> The file would not tab complete in
Hi All...
I just tried executing a file on my desktop as /c/Users/me/Desktop/file.exe in
Vista Business SP1.
The file would not tab complete in bash and an ls -al showed no execute access.
Do I need to add the exec or cygexec explicitly, or should that be the default
with noacl?
Thanks,
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:44:47 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.0 2009-05-18 snapshot text mounts
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 08:33:09PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 05:23:31PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>>
>>>
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:04:10 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.0 2009-05-18 snapshot text mounts
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:21:49PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>
>>Hi All...
>>
>>I am using the Cygwin-1.7.0 2009-05-18 snapshot on a Vista Bus
Hi All...
I am using the Cygwin-1.7.0 2009-05-18 snapshot on a Vista Business SP1 box.
The following is my fstab contents
none / cygdrive text,noacl,posix=0 0 0
If I create a file with
cat some-file> /c/Users/me/Desktop/file.txt
I get Unix line endings. If I use Cywgin vim to create
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:12:37 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.0-48, Vista Business SP1 and Openssh
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:53:15PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>The first line of the fstab is used for the failing case, adding the
>>second and third l
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:45:54 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.0-48, Vista Business SP1 and Openssh
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:39:58PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>> From: Karl
>>> Subject: Cygwin 1.7.0-48, Vista Business SP1 and Openssh
>>>
> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:34:44 -0400
> From: cgf
> Subject: Re: Cygwin 1.7.0-48, Vista Business SP1 and Openssh
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 09:16:36PM -0700, Karl M wrote:
>>If I ssh into the box as myself (administrator account), all is well.
>>
>>If I ssh int
> From: Karl
> Subject: Cygwin 1.7.0-48, Vista Business SP1 and Openssh
> Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:16:36 -0700
>
>
> Hi All...
>
> I just did a clean install of 1.7.0-48 on a Vista box today with the latest
> setup-1.7.
>
> The process went smoothly :-)
>
> But I noticed one strange thing.
>
>
Hi All...
I just did a clean install of 1.7.0-48 on a Vista box today with the latest
setup-1.7.
The process went smoothly :-)
But I noticed one strange thing.
If I ssh into the box as myself (administrator account), all is well.
If I ssh into the box as another account (non-administrat
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
