Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-20 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >> >If you only want to use the content of your passwd and group files, >> >rather than the db (which is pretty much upside down from what this >> >patch is trying to accomplish, but, anyway), simply change your >> >/etc/nsswitch.conf file accordingly. Just as on Linux. >> >> :-) My /

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-20 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >> However, as you know, the supplementary group to which I referred above do >> NOT show >> up in my /etc/group file on Cygwin (they show up in SAM ... somewhere). >> >> ... and I do not care, as these groups are NOT relevant to me as a >> Cygwin-only user >> of the Windows operatin

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-20 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >> Now that the XP bug is out of the way ... I would like come back to the >> change in >> the output of 'id'. >> >> Obviously, everything after '545(Users),' in the output of 'id' are >> "well-known" >> concepts (Windows) to you (but, not to me) ... > >I explained that in my mail an

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-20 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >> What I meant was: >> >> The output of 'id' in my "regular setup" shows: >> >> @@# id >> uid=1003(Henri) gid=513(None) >> groups=513(None),0(root),544(Administrators),545(Users) >> >> The output of 'id' in the "test setup" shows: >> >> $ id >> uid=1003(Henri) gid=513(None) >> group

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-19 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >Can you please just test the today's snapshot which should show up >soon on the http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ page. Like Andrey I tested the 19/2 snapshot of today (x86). For good measure, I again started afresh ... getpwent (db_enum: local) no longer crashes. Splendid! Henri --

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-19 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Andrey, >>>I'm going to make some tests on XP, but if I can't track this down, >>>would you mind if I send you a test Cygwin DLL with extended debug >>>output to help tracking it down? > >> The best thing to do, I believe, if you want to fix 'XP' (my machine may >> turn out >> to be a "misfit"

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-19 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, (Sorry, have't found time to properly subscribe to the list, yet) >> Both cases show the same output: >> >> $ ./lsa >> pdom name: dnsname: <(null)>, sid: 0x0 >> adom name: sid: 0x246058 I "lied" here :-) The non-admin case showed: ... sid: 0x246060 (So, almost the same) >Huh. Thi

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-18 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >The crash looks weird. It looks like your machine doesn't return >the machine sid when it's requested. Can you please run the following >test application as non-admin and as admin and paster the output for >both cases into your reply? Hmm, maybe that's a windows XP thingy? >I didn'

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-18 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, >> After I had set up /etc/nsswitch.conf as follows >> >> db_enum: files >> >> the output of getpwent and getgrent looked "familiar" to me. (though the >> output of 'id' is not). > >In how far? Did you read my text in terms of how user and group names >are created? The leading separa

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-18 Thread J.H. vd Water
Hi Corinna, To answer some of your questions ... >> How did you build getpwent? Did you stop your Cygwin shell and restart >> it? Can you please send the getpwent.exe.stackdump file? I used my "regular" setup of Cygwin to compile the sourcefile. Perhaps it is there where I went wrong. gcc -o

Re: Testers needed: New passwd/group handling in Cygwin

2014-02-18 Thread J.H. vd Water
>> this week I applied the first incarnation of the new passwd/group >> handling code to the Cygwin repository and after fixing a crash which >> manifested in Denis Excoffier's network, I think we're at a point >> which allows to push this forward. >> [...] > >Ok guys, I just applied a patch implem